So essentially the light bulb is fast enough that any series impedance is not necessary at all. I thought raising the line impedance might help but I realize now maybe the light bulb goes into a thermal runaway of sorts so it works better as a limiter when there is a surge and goes into a protective region even faster?
The idea was that the impedance element is 'ever present' and thus 'instantaneous' compared to the light bulb which still is defined by thermal time constants of some sort.
But I suppose if you choose the right light bulb, you can get the 'correct' cold resistance. I don't know how much variance there is in resistance (i.e. how many different light bulbs are too much).
Careful, you're overthinking this. This isn't a laser-focussed piece of precision test equipment. It's one step above a crowbar and duct tape! There is no 'correct' value. There's just a 'this might be okay' value.
I see someone on youtube built a box with 4 light bulbs that can be switched in and out in parallel/series configurations... which is starting to get slightly crazy, hence the desire for a single light bulb and a adjustable impedance element of some sort. That machine he has there is a little big for my taste.
I was quite intrigued to note that his 4 bulbs allow him to hit every 20 W increment from 40 W to 200 W except for 180 W. Very nice, but I don't see the value in that level of precision. One good thing about his permanently mounted bulbs is that you're not juggling glass bulbs. Depending on how fumble-fingered you are, you might find yourself cleaning up shattered bulbs.
Given that the machine in the video does exist and someone made it, are you sure there is no room for a rheostat to try to reduce it?
What value of rheostat would you use? 5 ohms? No, that would 'limit' the current to 24 Amps! 100 ohms? That would limit the current to 1.2 A, but the cost would be an unacceptably high voltage drop under normal conditions. For example, if the DUT is supposed to draw 100 ma, the voltage drop across the 100 ohm resistor would be 10V. That might be acceptable, but you're approaching the limit. A higher current DUT will make things worse. And let's not forget about the power dissipation. Your 100 ohm resistor will have to be rated for 144 W. 150W rheostats are certainly available, but they're a bit large - about 4 inches in diameter. They can also be a bit expensive, although I see some cheap ones coming out of China.
I guess part of the problem is that the light bulb controlled proportion of the impedance would be too small in comparison to the whole thing.. but I was hoping maybe to change 4 light bulb design to a equivalent two light bulb design.
Well, if you did something similar to the video, but with just 40W and 60W bulbs, you'd have the equivalent of a 40, 60, and 100 W limiter. That would be suitable for larger devices but not for smaller ones. I'm not sure if that's a deficiency or not. Smaller devices might actually be
more difficult to protect due to their generally lower power devices that will overload and blow at low current or power.
And by PTC I mean a inrush limiter PTC not a cutoff, I guess the problem is I am thinking of a NTC not a PTC (switchmode power supply inrush limiter), not sure if PTC come in a 'mild' form? I never really thought about how fast a NTC in a power supply is.
An NTC thermistor starts at a high resistance and, as current flows through it, it heats up and the resistance drops. This allows the input capacitors to charge while limiting the current spike that would otherwise be present. That's the opposite to what we want. I don't know if a 'mild' PTC is available but, again, the question of power dissipation comes to mind. Also, both types of device would be relatively slow to 'reset' to their initial states so you'd have to wait a bit between tests. I really have no idea if that would be a practical issue or not.
Ed