Author Topic: Fluke 8010A without NiCad Batteries  (Read 4627 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline gmilliornTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 41
Fluke 8010A without NiCad Batteries
« on: September 13, 2014, 09:52:24 pm »
While working on my HP counter, my Fluke 8010A died.  I had to dust off the Simpson
260.  Anyway, unlike most Fluke failures it is not the display, but the battery.  I've
already replaced it once, and it is a waste of money since it never leaves the bench.
But, the manual specifically says not to operate it without a battery.

I did anyway, briefly, to check that the batteries were the problem.  Seems to work OK.
However, the circuitry seems to be a standard constant current using an LM317.

Instead of replacing the battery again, it seems like I could just reconfigure the
LM317 to provide ~2.4V, since that is the fully-charged battery voltage, by adding
the appropriate values from pins 1-3 and 3-gnd.  Anyone ever tried that?


 

Offline Skimask

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1433
  • Country: us
Re: Fluke 8010A without NiCad Batteries
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2014, 10:02:47 pm »
2 fully charged NiCad's would be more around ~2.8v.

Google has been, and always shall be, your friend.

I've got 2 8012A's.  Basically the same thing.  Batteries shot, never leave the bench.  Put a 1/2 watt 100 ohm resistor in place of the batteries.  Didn't mess with the R's across the '317.  Still working after X number of years.  Didn't even solder in the resistor, just got it hanging there...
I didn't take it apart.
I turned it on.

The only stupid question is, well, most of them...

Save a fuse...Blow an electrician.
 

Online tautech

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 29614
  • Country: nz
  • Taupaki Technologies Ltd. Siglent Distributor NZ.
    • Taupaki Technologies Ltd.
Re: Fluke 8010A without NiCad Batteries
« Reply #2 on: September 13, 2014, 10:23:45 pm »
2 fully charged NiCad's would be more around ~2.8v.

Google has been, and always shall be, your friend.
+1
But if there is a tidy/elegant  :-/O for ~2.8 V that surely would be the preferred option?
Plus a sticker on the outside to remind you when the memory of the mod fades.
Avid Rabid Hobbyist.
Some stuff seen @ Siglent HQ cannot be shared.
 

Offline gmilliornTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 41
Re: Fluke 8010A without NiCad Batteries
« Reply #3 on: September 13, 2014, 10:54:45 pm »
Hmm, 100 ohms is certainly simpler, I'll try that, thanks!

Incidentally, I did Google and all I found was tons of complaints
about the display dying.  I must not have used the right
words...
 

Offline ModemHead

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 731
  • Country: us
  • No user-serviceable parts inside.
    • Mr. ModemHead
Re: Fluke 8010A without NiCad Batteries
« Reply #4 on: September 13, 2014, 10:54:59 pm »
Instead of replacing the battery again, it seems like I could just reconfigure the
LM317 to provide ~2.4V, since that is the fully-charged battery voltage, by adding
the appropriate values from pins 1-3 and 3-gnd.  Anyone ever tried that?
I did that on an 8050A.  It uses a 4-cell battery, so I reconfigured the LM317 for voltage regulation at about 5.6V.  Works fine and keeps the voltage regulation within original design intent.
 

Offline SeanB

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 16384
  • Country: za
Re: Fluke 8010A without NiCad Batteries
« Reply #5 on: September 14, 2014, 05:36:47 pm »
Mod the regulator or add 5 1N5403 in series instead of the 2 cells to drop around 3V to keep the supply happy.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf