Hi and a Happy New Year,
As promised last time, I am coming back with more details on this meter and the issues it's having:
1. Ever since receiving it, the meter has behaved the same way: no reading updates, with either a static value or 0 being displayed for pretty much all readings.
2. As seen in the pictures included, the meter is comprised of two boards: what I call "the main board" and "the display board".
Each board has a microcontroller and associated EEPROM, all in PLCC package.
The main board has an additional PLCC component - the ADC, which is a Gossen custom (or re-branded) IC - marking GMACD30.
Initially, all these PLCC ICs were soldered directly to their corresponding boards.
3. Beside the main issue above, the meter would also sometimes fail to start properly (CPU seemed to be working, but display was garbled).
This led me to think there might be a problem with the meter FW or access to it.
So, I decided I would desolder the EEPROMs and check their contents.
And, since I was at it and just in case one of the other PLCC ICs needed replacing, I decided to desolder also the microcontroller and the ADC on the main board.
I did not desolder the microcontroller on the display board since, once started, the meter seemed to respond to controls just fine (e.g. changing measurement functions, going into setup, etc.).
This is how the meter ended up looking like it is in the pictures - i.e. using PLCC sockets, except for the largest IC on the display board.
4. Going back to checking the EEPROMs and their contents, I was able to confirm they are working fine.
Also, the meter intermittent startup issue seems to have gone away since then.
5. My next thought was to check the ADC IC and, for that, I took apart a working Metrahit 25S who has the same type of IC.
So, I desoldered the ADC from the working 25S and installed a corresponding PLCC socket on that meter as well.
Next, I installed the ADC from the 25S in our meter here, but that didn't make any difference.
I then installed the ADC from the Metratop in the 25S and confirmed it was working (I only checked for correct multimeter functionality and rough measurement values).
6. At some point in time, I just happened to find some NOS for the microcontroller on the main board, so I replaced that, athough I didn't have any particular suspicions it was bad or something (i.e. I replaced it just because I could).
As expected, this didn't make any difference in terms of meter behaviour.
7. Sometime during all the above, I also checked the power supply voltages.
The unfortunate thing here is there is no silkscreen anywhere on the main board, so I didn't have any reference to check against.
So, to the degree I was able to guesstimate the expected voltages, they looked ok, but take that with a not-so-small pinch of salt.
8. At this stage, with FW, main board microcontroller and ADC all confirmed OK, I turned my attention to the analog part, particularly the input.
Here, as I mentioned in my previous post, I meassured the input impedance and here are the results:
- DCV impedance:
+ Ever increasing (reached over 100 MOhms) for the 300 mV, 3 V, 30 V and 1,000 V.
This was the case when measuring both with normal polarity (i.e. positive lead of measuring meter connected to V/Ohms input terminal of our meter here & negative lead of the measuring meter connected to COM terminal of our meter), as well as reverse polarity.
+ For the 300 V range, the impedance readings started at about 8.x MOhms, then gradually increased and settled to 9.95 MOhms.
As with the other ranges, this was observed in both directions.
However, unlike the other cases, when measuring the impedance with normal polarity, the display on the Metratop would actually change value and display -48.577 V (the value is, of course, wrong, but it was interesting that it displayed something different from 0 V).
- ACV impedance:
+ Ever increasing (reached over 50 MOhms) for all ranges.
9. This particular meter model has 2 input channels, at least for voltage measurements.
The observations at point 8 above apply only to CH1 of the meter.
Input impedance for CH2 is within expected ranges.
Yet, when activating CH2 readings, the readings would be wrong for it as well (see one of the pictures attached).
There are few more observations that come to mind, but I think this post is quite long already and I don't believe those additional points are that important (at this stage, at least).
Any suggestions on what to try next, please?
Thanks!