Author Topic: Induction cooktop repair - IGBT selection  (Read 2568 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline radar_macgyverTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 698
  • Country: us
Induction cooktop repair - IGBT selection
« on: May 12, 2021, 05:52:54 am »
My induction cooktop quit working, blew a breaker and an internal board-mount fuse. It has two Toshiba GT40QR21 IGBTs in parallel driving the coil. I desoldered both, one shows a short across all three terminals, I can measure the body diode on the other one. The Toshiba IGBT seems to be an obsolete part, so I looked on DK for a potential replacement. There aren't many TO3-P IGBTs available, so I filtered by Vce(max) > 1200V and went through the data sheets. I'm not familiar with IGBTs, so should I reject parts that have too high an input capacitance compared to the GT40QR21? The GT40QR21 has a Cies = 1500 pF, most of the ones on DK have Cies 2-3 times that. The gate driver on the board appears to be a discrete design with a 2SC8050 and 2SC8550.

Current candidates: RJH1CV7DPK, IXDH20N120D1

Any help is appreciated, thanks!
 

Offline shakalnokturn

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2123
  • Country: fr
Re: Induction cooktop repair - IGBT selection
« Reply #1 on: May 12, 2021, 07:10:18 am »
Usually higher gate capacitance means that they'll be rated for higher collector current.
Of course it also means higher gate drive current or longer switching times which mean more heat.

At double the capacitance it may be worth reverse engineering the gate drive circuit to evaluate it or if you have an isolation transformer or differential probe comparing the gate switching times with dummy capacitors.
 

Offline T3sl4co1l

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 21658
  • Country: us
  • Expert, Analog Electronics, PCB Layout, EMC
    • Seven Transistor Labs
Re: Induction cooktop repair - IGBT selection
« Reply #2 on: May 12, 2021, 06:53:13 pm »
Is it? They have some in stock at Mouser... give or take the parenthesis-junk they have tacked onto there.

Sort by gate charge, it's really what matters.  Uh, hmm, bizarre, Toshiba didn't even record that parameter...

Cies tends to be a poor representative of overall performance.  The missing part is Cres, the cause of the gate voltage Miller plateau when switching (which I'd point to a figure for, but again, they don't rate charge on this thing..).  The combination of Cies swinging ~10V, and Cres swinging ~100s V, defines total gate charge, and therefore speed at a given R_G.

It doesn't look too bad, as they rate switching time at R_G = 39Ω and it's still doing on the order of 200ns, about as fast as the device can switch anyway.  (IGBTs are a hybrid MOS-BJT structure, with most of the current carried by the BJT; as a result, they have switching performance similar to BJTs, most importantly storage time and fall time are limited by semiconductor properties (doping and carrier lifetime) -- whereas for a MOSFET alone, it's defined by terminal capacitances and how hard you can drive the gate.)

RJH1CV7DPK shows EOL on Mouser, are you sure...you didn't mix up the two??

Another important property you will need to shop for, is using two in parallel.  IGBTs in general, parallel about as well as BJTs, for the same reason -- which is to say, typically not well.  You're looking for a positive tempco in Vce(sat), so that as one device heats up, it carries less current in saturation, putting more load on the other which then heats up as well, and they track.  Most have a negative to flat tempco, so are difficult to parallel.

The RJH1CV7DPK definitely shows higher capacitance (ugh, why can't they use log-log capacitance plots), but shows similar switching speeds at modest R_G so it might not be a bad sub.  Beware that current ratings are slightly lower; maybe it will be more prone to failure as a result.

IXDH20N120D1: pulsed current seems to be smaller, not sure how significant that might be in this application.  Oh, it's probably just that it's measured at TC=90°C for some reason.
Nice that it has a short-circuit rating, but it doesn't have a FBSOA to fill out that picture, go figure.
Also no capacitance curves?  Weird...
Doesn't show Vce(sat) vs. T, and the "Typ. output characteristics" for 25, 125°C look very similar, but notice the one has an expanded axis, so it's probably the case the tempco is positive.
Has a different package, but TO-247 is usually compatible with TO-3P -- good eye expanding your search this way.


Beware that the gate drive is usually toast, as the transistor fails as a three-way short, putting some hundreds of volts momentarily into that part of the circuit.  The gate resistor, drive transistors, and perhaps neighboring logic, or aux supply, may need to be replaced as well.  (Which, if that includes the micro itself, good luck with that.)  If it's totally toast, good thing these aren't expensive or anything... well, give or take if this is a single hob or one of several on a stove, YMMV.

Tim
Seven Transistor Labs, LLC
Electronic design, from concept to prototype.
Bringing a project to life?  Send me a message!
 

Offline radar_macgyverTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 698
  • Country: us
Re: Induction cooktop repair - IGBT selection
« Reply #3 on: May 13, 2021, 06:05:09 am »
Usually higher gate capacitance means that they'll be rated for higher collector current.
The parts I looked it had higher gate capacitance, with only moderately increased Ic.

Tim:
Thanks for the detailed reply, indeed they are available at Mouser. I swear I checked last night...

I was stumped by the lack of a gate charge specification, based on my limited experience with power MOSFETs. The gate driver is a discrete pair of BJTs, both of which seem to be healthy (~0.6V across all junctions, but measured in-circuit), so maybe the driver survived the failure. It's also interesting that only one of the two paralleled IGBTs failed, likely due to current hogging - there's nothing on the emitters.

I wanted to try to fix this mostly to see if I could; I suppose I should just give in and get a new one (the original is a cheap countertop unit, nothing fancy).
 

Online Kleinstein

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 14176
  • Country: de
Re: Induction cooktop repair - IGBT selection
« Reply #4 on: May 13, 2021, 06:46:21 am »
With 2 in parallel I would replace both to get a slightly better chance for matching.
 
The following users thanked this post: T3sl4co1l

Offline radar_macgyverTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 698
  • Country: us
Re: Induction cooktop repair - IGBT selection
« Reply #5 on: May 14, 2021, 04:21:58 am »
With 2 in parallel I would replace both to get a slightly better chance for matching.
Yes, I've got a few IGBTs on order and will replace both. Then I have a few left over to play with, and learn a bit about how they work.  :-/O
 

Offline radar_macgyverTopic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 698
  • Country: us
Re: Induction cooktop repair - IGBT selection
« Reply #6 on: May 20, 2021, 04:51:06 am »
Replacement IGBTs came in this evening from Mouser, swapped them in, replaced the fuse and it works! Thanks all for the pointers. Now to come up with a project for the extra IGBTs that isn't likely to kill me...
 

Offline shakalnokturn

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2123
  • Country: fr
Re: Induction cooktop repair - IGBT selection
« Reply #7 on: May 21, 2021, 01:26:03 pm »
A couple of ideas that both involve induction heating I'd like to try if I had time:
-Small iron furnace.
-Plastic injection moulding.

Less practical, more fun:
-Drink can crusher.
-Bearing ball launcher.
 

Offline PBh

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 14
  • Country: fr
Re: Induction cooktop repair - IGBT selection
« Reply #8 on: July 21, 2021, 07:52:58 pm »
I have repaired (or not !) some induction cooktops. I have seen in them the following IGBTs:
irg4pc50ud
HGTG40N60A4
G20N60B3D
SGH80N60UFD
gw39nc60VD
IXGR48N60C3D1
FGA25N120ANTD
H30R1202

Réf   Prix   Package   Broch   Vces   Ic@100°C   Pd@100°C   RthJC   Vge(th)max   VceSat@25A   Td(on)   Td(off)   Ets (total sw loss)   Trr   Irr
            V   A   W   °C/W   V   V   ns   nd   mJ   ns@125°C   A@125°C
irg4pc50ud   0,63   TO-247AC   GCE-C   600   27   78   0,64   6   2   46   230   2   160   15
HGTG40N60A4   0,97   TO-247   GCE-C   600   63   250   0,2   7   2,7   25   145   2,2   -   -
G20N60B3D   0,82   TO-247   GCE-C   600   24   66   0,76   6   2   25   275   1,525   55   
SGH80N60UFD      TO-3PN   GCE-?   600   40   78   0,64   6,5   2,6   23   200   2   105   10
gw39nc60VD       TO-247   GCE-?   600   40   86   0,58   5,75   2,5   33   178   2,57   45   5,8
IXGR48N60C3D1      I+247   GCE-I   600   26      1,5      2,7   19   92   0,65   100   
(copy/paste in excel ?)
Enjoy !
 
The following users thanked this post: fzabkar

Offline lastguy

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 28
  • Country: us
Re: Induction cooktop repair - IGBT selection
« Reply #9 on: November 03, 2021, 01:51:12 am »
I have repaired (or not !) some induction cooktops. I have seen in them the following IGBTs:
I repair my Electrolux cooktop which uses IGBT IXGR40N60C2D1. I bought same part# different brand on ebay, the middle pin and back metal are connected which I think it is normal.
The board has one rectifier and two pairs of above IGBT. the rectifier and one pair of IGBT burnt. The remained two IGBT with center pins and heatsink all isolated. No heat isolation film found, around chips do have dried white heat absorb material that often found in many products, like a layer of paint. Can manufacturing just spray and use it as insolation layer? current area is clean aluminum and I forgot whether there is white layer under the chips but looks like none of them, white material is surrounded.
My questions is: is there same part# with similar white metal at the back can be isolated with center pin? I tend to add thermal film rather than rubber pad for isolation, as rubber heat sink pad is thick. thanks for help,
« Last Edit: November 03, 2021, 02:03:09 am by lastguy »
 

Online fzabkar

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2258
  • Country: au
Re: Induction cooktop repair - IGBT selection
« Reply #10 on: November 03, 2021, 06:13:22 pm »
Just making it a little more readable ...

Code: [Select]
Réf Prix Package Broch Vces Ic@100°C Pd@100°C RthJC Vge(th)max VceSat@25A Td(on) Td(off) Ets (total sw loss) Trr Irr
V A W °C/W V V ns nd mJ ns@125°C A@125°C
irg4pc50ud 0,63   TO-247AC GCE-C 600 27 78 0,64 6 2 46 230 2 160 15
HGTG40N60A4 0,97 TO-247 GCE-C 600 63 250 0,2 7 2,7 25 145 2,2 - -
G20N60B3D 0,82 TO-247 GCE-C 600 24 66 0,76 6 2 25 275 1,525 55
SGH80N60UFD TO-3PN GCE-? 600 40 78 0,64 6,5 2,6 23 200 2 105 10
gw39nc60VD TO-247 GCE-? 600 40 86 0,58 5,75 2,5 33 178 2,57 45 5,8
IXGR48N60C3D1 I+247 GCE-I 600 26 1,5 2,7 19 92 0,65 100
« Last Edit: November 03, 2021, 06:19:12 pm by fzabkar »
 
The following users thanked this post: shakalnokturn

Offline lastguy

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 28
  • Country: us
Re: Induction cooktop repair - IGBT selection
« Reply #11 on: November 06, 2021, 04:12:51 pm »
Just making it a little more readable ...

Code: [Select]
Réf----- Prix Package  Broch Vces Ic@100°C Pd@100°C RthJC Vge(th)max VceSat@25A Td(on) Td(off) Ets (total sw loss) Trr Irr
V A W °C/W V V ns nd mJ ns@125°C A@125°C
irg4pc50ud 0,63   TO-247AC GCE-C 600 27 78 0,64 6 2 46 230 2 160 15
HGTG40N60A4 0,97 TO-247 GCE-C 600 63 250 0,2 7 2,7 25 145 2,2 - -
G20N60B3D 0,82 TO-247 GCE-C 600 24 66 0,76 6 2 25 275 1,525 55
SGH80N60UFD TO-3PN GCE-? 600 40 78 0,64 6,5 2,6 23 200 2 105 10
gw39nc60VD TO-247 GCE-? 600 40 86 0,58 5,75 2,5 33 178 2,57 45 5,8
IXGR48N60C3D1 I+247 GCE-I 600 26 1,5 2,7 19 92 0,65 100
thanks
« Last Edit: November 07, 2021, 04:01:16 pm by lastguy »
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf