Generally speaking a beginners scope would be a far less complicated affair with either 1 or 2 channels only and limited bandwidth and options. By your own admissions you find that certain aspects of this particular scope difficult to get to grips with and that for a very good reasons as this was back in the day considered to be a advanced scope more for the professional user.
Perhaps this short video may highlight more to you what is a beginners model, I myself started off with this model which is considerably more basic than the SS5710 scope you have.
https://www.rapidonline.com/rapid-7020a-20mhz-dual-channel-oscilloscope-85-2200 although mine was 2nd hand and cost me £120.
Which as you can see is a dual channel, 20MHz unit with no delay timebase or others functions as you have on the SS5710.
There is no reason why it is not possible to start with a SS5710 or even a very expensive unit such as
https://www.rohde-schwarz.com/uk/product/rto-productstartpage_63493-10790.html but the learning curve on such a unit is far far steeper and the likelyhood of it being totally wrecked because of a rooky error is huge, but thats fine if you can afford to throw away £12,800 everytime you make a mistake in connecting it up etc.
Generally I believe that it is far more preferable to start of with a real real cheap and cheerful scope and move onto something a bit more sophisticated and higher bandwidth etc, maybe even a digital scope and thats another level again with its cursors and built in measurements and maths functions etc. once you actually what it is that you are looking for from an oscilloscope, it might just for for simple audio work and you find that the basic scope covers all the bases nicely, who knows?
EDIT. I attach a better photograph of my first oscilloscope and as you can very clearly see it is a far simpler one to learn on and make your mistakes on rather than blowing the front end out on a expensive and more capable scope
