Author Topic: Keithley 193 schematics  (Read 976 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Sigma9876Topic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 8
  • Country: de
Keithley 193 schematics
« on: January 13, 2024, 07:18:36 am »
Hi everyone,

scored a Keithley 193 DMM lately - great instrument and in good shape.
However, for some minor things (check caps etc) I would need the schematics. The problem is that all the manual versions out there (including the original one at the Tek website) have diagram pages which are barely readable due to a very poor scan quality.

So: Does anyone own a printed (or better scanned) version and would be so kind to provide it? As said, it's just about the 3-4 pages with the schematics. Any format appreciated - I would happily puzzle together some phone camera fotos.

Many thanks in advance
Sigma9876
 

Offline coromonadalix

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6860
  • Country: ca
Re: Keithley 193 schematics
« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2024, 03:30:33 pm »
some roms here  etc ... teardown

https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/brief-teardown-keithley-193-system-dmm/

on Ebay you have some sellers,  ask them if they can confirm  the schematic readable and clean ...  not made with "all you can find on the web"


not sure if the 194 is a brother ?? some schematics are less crappy  :palm:
« Last Edit: January 13, 2024, 03:42:10 pm by coromonadalix »
 

Online Kleinstein

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 14973
  • Country: de
Re: Keithley 193 schematics
« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2024, 04:32:01 pm »
The schematics I got (likely from DevX) is not that bad. Every 2nd page is a bit thin, but still readable. The resistor values are litsted in an extra table if needed. I would consider the scan good enough, though not perfect.
 

Offline coromonadalix

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 6860
  • Country: ca
Re: Keithley 193 schematics
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2024, 10:06:55 pm »
yeah  seen them,  but i dont know why they are so crappy,   have they been  fuzzed out / garbled this way ??   when  the other manual parts / pages are fine ?
 

Offline Sigma9876Topic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 8
  • Country: de
Re: Keithley 193 schematics
« Reply #4 on: January 14, 2024, 04:50:59 am »
yeah thanks: seen that and read in detail. Very helpful at least for comparison with my unit; however no info/links regarding better readable schematics.

sigma9876
 

Offline Sigma9876Topic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 8
  • Country: de
Re: Keithley 193 schematics
« Reply #5 on: January 14, 2024, 04:52:02 am »
...ah sorry: I will check the 194 info. tx,
 

Offline Sigma9876Topic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 8
  • Country: de
Re: Keithley 193 schematics
« Reply #6 on: January 14, 2024, 04:56:52 am »
@Kleinstein:
Well yeah, on mine even the rectangles showing the ICs are pixelated. Neither part# nor values readable (sometimes you can guess...)
Maybe yours is better - could you show it?
 

Offline Sigma9876Topic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 8
  • Country: de
Re: Keithley 193 schematics
« Reply #7 on: January 14, 2024, 05:01:03 am »
@coromonadalix:

My guess is that the rest of the manual has been PDFed from a text file, whereas the schematics are on larger fold-in pages in the original printed version. Thus they have been treated (=scanned) separately and much worse.
 

Offline Sigma9876Topic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 8
  • Country: de
Re: Keithley 193 schematics
« Reply #8 on: January 14, 2024, 05:36:28 am »
@coromonadalix:

Had a quick overview on the TEK website:

191   5.5   classic rhomb
192   6.5   shoebox
193   6.5   system
194   4.5   system
195   5.5   shoebox
196   5.5   shoebox
197   5.5   classic rhomb
198   -
199   5.75 shoebox

The closest brother of the 193 is thus the 192. The schematics are similar, but different still. In the manual they are much better readable, so they might be helpful. Tx for the hint.
 
The following users thanked this post: coromonadalix

Offline Chris56000

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 913
  • Country: gb
Re: Keithley 193 schematics
« Reply #9 on: January 14, 2024, 05:07:08 pm »
Hi!

The '192 and '193 aren't close enough for the 192 book to be a reliable guide, as the 193 uses 14–segment display devices – I am studying the 193 circuits from what is freely available online to see shat I can decipher, but new drawings won't be a quick or easy job I'm afraid!

Chris Williams

It's an enigma that's what it is!! This thing's not fixed because it doesn't want to be fixed!!
 

Online Kleinstein

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 14973
  • Country: de
Re: Keithley 193 schematics
« Reply #10 on: January 14, 2024, 05:59:35 pm »
I don't don't see such a major issue with the quality of the manual. Essentially all is still readable.

I woul consider the K196 the closest relative (at least for the ADC part), but no real need to use it to help with the schematics.

Attached is a portion of the schematics that looks about worst, and there is one more area (~ 1/4 page) similar bad. One can still get a good guess there.


P.S:  I found one more bad page with the power supply - there things are really hard to read. The version I have a copy is from 1/23/2001 and 8.7 MB large.
« Last Edit: January 14, 2024, 06:04:21 pm by Kleinstein »
 

Offline Sigma9876Topic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 8
  • Country: de
Re: Keithley 193 schematics
« Reply #11 on: January 14, 2024, 06:47:41 pm »
@Kleinstein:

You are right - the 196 is pretty similar (as for the ADC).
Concerning the readability: most (exception below) you can put together using the parts list - you're right with this.
However the Fig 7.5 (Digital board) in unreadable at the bottom (at least in my version) - see attached PDF. If you have anything better than that, I would appreciate getting a copy.

Sigma9876
 

Offline Sigma9876Topic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 8
  • Country: de
Re: Keithley 193 schematics
« Reply #12 on: January 14, 2024, 07:06:45 pm »
@Chris5600:

100% ack. What is on the web are bad scans - I just thought maybe someone has the paper book and is not asking 40$ for 3 pages.
The 192 / 193 are different (like you say) as for the display, so you cannot take over the digital circuits as such.

Sigma9876
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf