He actually used a specific HAMEG setup (as I understand..)
with proper carefully intervals to spot some tricky "design"
limitations of today "modern" stuff.
Reading the whole thing with care one thing actually
spots my eyes even much more than just the BAD PFC design..
Regarding GPUs (which are not like CPUs) the typical 431 FB network
(which mostly also uses a Type3 compensator) is just as limited
to answer these fast in rush currents and compensate the regulation
fast enough..
very interesting thoughts on how regulation can put a bad delay
which will certainly impact other devices which are - as of today -
attached to the same POWER RAIL... CPUS disks...
IMHO GPUs require a separate PSU.. wo PFCs and even the TL431 seems
totally obsolete to answer that fast in rush..
Very interesting readings..
https://www.igorslab.de/en/power-recording-graphics-card-power-supply-interaction-measurement/Paul
PS.. please note carefully his comments on these..
"Over the last few months, I have been able to measure different manufacturer solutions in the supply of graphics cards. Initially, it was smaller cards such as different models of the GeForce GTX 750 Ti, whose power consumption did not really exceed the 60 watts on average, but depending on the model and the clock can generate very high power peaks. Then the 75-watt limit for fractions of a second falls quite clearly, as the graphic clearly shows us:"