When you look at the two schematic diagrams, they look very similar. Then you notice that someone with little experience made the changes for the D model. In the newer model the long tail pair runs at a gain of about 2x (220R versus 470R), which i would consider a severe mistake. In the original version gain was 10x (100R versus 1K). Then you notice he introduced gain limiting also for the second pair (R121, R122). Probably that amplifier has significant THD at low levels (above 0.1 %). Don't know what R126 and R127 shall be good for. The diodes around C102 are an improvement though.
Please note that these amplifiers have a SOA-protection for their output stage (Q108, Q109 and their circuitry). They are meant to limit output current depending on output voltage to guarantee safe operation. That means the amplifier will drive ohmic loads well up to it's clipping limit (with LED indicator). But the amplifier will also limit with resonant loads like huge bass drivers or compound speakers with built-in passive crossover networks. There won't be any indication of that type of limiting, except bad sound. By the way: this circuit of SOA-Protection ignores the fact that SOA depends on temperature. So you can kill the amplifier with a single half-amplitude 10 msec pulse after running it hot for a while.
In my opinion class AB with +/- 95 V supply will not run reliably. Above in this thread there was the proposal to buy a new transformer with somewhat lower output voltage, lets say 2x 55 V. That sounds more realistic and i think 2x 40 Vrms are enough. Then the amplifier will run at about +/- 55 Vdc and output peak power of 300 W into a 4 Ohm load. With PA speakers 2x 300 W is extremely loud and for home use you will rarely listen at more than 10 W or so.
Regards, Dieter