Author Topic: Tektronix 465B: B sweep not working, strange square wave shape, shadow signal  (Read 1020 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline robb.casanovaTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 3
  • Country: it
Hi everybody, I recently purchased a Tek 465B. I'm not an expert but I'm doing lot of work with MCUs so i decided to dive into electronics basics.

The issues I'm trying to solve are these ones:

- B sweep not working
- Square wave from calibration is not square
- There's a back shadow signal on display

Can somebody please help me? Thank you!
« Last Edit: May 09, 2020, 07:50:51 am by robb.casanova »
 

Offline tggzzz

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 20952
  • Country: gb
  • Numbers, not adjectives
    • Having fun doing more, with less
Hi everybody, I recently purchased a Tek 465B. I'm not an expert but I'm doing lot of work with MCUs so i decided to dive into electronics basics.

The issues I'm trying to solve are these ones:

- B sweep not working

That's as much information as "my computer's modem is not working"!

Was it sold to you as a working scope? What makes you think it isn't working?

Quote
- Square wave from calibration is not square

You need to calibrate the probe.

Quote
- There's a back shadow signal on display

Turn the brightness down.

Quote
Can somebody please help me? Thank you!

You should read the 465's manuals (easily found on the web e.g. http://w140.com/tekwiki/wiki/Main_Page ) and optionally some simple "introduction to an oscilloscope" texts.
There are lies, damned lies, statistics - and ADC/DAC specs.
Glider pilot's aphorism: "there is no substitute for span". Retort: "There is a substitute: skill+imagination. But you can buy span".
Having fun doing more, with less
 

Offline robb.casanovaTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 3
  • Country: it
Thank you for your reply. I already downloaded the operation manual and I'm using it to test voltages touchpoints, i cannot test the "time shapes" because i don't have another oscilloscope.

The issue with the shadow is not related to brightness because increasing brightness both the main trace and the shadow intensity increase.

About the square wave, i will receive today new probes so I hope it will fix that issue. Thx.

My main concern is related to the B trigger, i can see only the first vertical line of the trace as you can see on the image. 
 

Offline tggzzz

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 20952
  • Country: gb
  • Numbers, not adjectives
    • Having fun doing more, with less
Your picture makes the trace seem very bright.

Have you tried and failed to calibrate the existing probes? Be aware the only purpose of the cal out signal is to allow the edge to be flattened out when seen with a standard *10 probe. The amplitude and frequency are not well defined. The probe's "capacitance compensation range, e.g. 10-30pF, must encompass the scope's input capacitance, e.g. 20pF.

For all we know, you may have the controls in the wrong position for the B channel to trigger.
There are lies, damned lies, statistics - and ADC/DAC specs.
Glider pilot's aphorism: "there is no substitute for span". Retort: "There is a substitute: skill+imagination. But you can buy span".
Having fun doing more, with less
 

Offline robb.casanovaTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 3
  • Country: it
Yep, i calibrated the probes but that distortion on square wave is not related to probe compensation.
Btw i found the issue with B triggering, the knob that controls the time resolution of B trigger was mounted in the wrong position.  |O

 

Offline tggzzz

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 20952
  • Country: gb
  • Numbers, not adjectives
    • Having fun doing more, with less
Yep, i calibrated the probes but that distortion on square wave is not related to probe compensation.
Btw i found the issue with B triggering, the knob that controls the time resolution of B trigger was mounted in the wrong position.  |O

Glad you sorted the B timebase issue. It sounds as if somebody has already attempted repair.

Presuming the overshoot is not probe related, and I remain to be convinced of that, there are three broad areas where it might arise: in a channel's input attenuators, in a channel's preamplifier, in the common amplifier.

Defining the problem as a functon of the channels and vertical sensitivity settings will help you understand where the problem lies.
There are lies, damned lies, statistics - and ADC/DAC specs.
Glider pilot's aphorism: "there is no substitute for span". Retort: "There is a substitute: skill+imagination. But you can buy span".
Having fun doing more, with less
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf