It's somewhat more expensive now, and there's nothing in the listing to confirm that it has the low voltage option included.
In the past I've used a hand-held battery-powered scope to test capacitors, but only out of circuit. It has a 1KHz 3.3V output test signal, and I connected the DUT across that output, along with the scope probes. Shown below are pictures of a good and bad capacitor of the same nominal value. The good cap looks pretty good at 2mV per division, but the bad one looks awful even at 200mV per division. (At 200mV per division, the good cap is a straight line.) Measuring only capacitance with another device didn't show much difference between the two caps, which is puzzling, but confirms that ESR is really what you need to know.
So instead of spending money on a new device, I wonder if I could modify the scope testing process a bit and be able to do in-circuit testing using stuff I already have.
First, the scope has a setting to change the test fequency to 10KHz, which I think should be done.
Second, I would insert an opamp with negative gain to reduce the square wave to, say, 200mV, or even 100mV. Then the scope probe and the leads to the in-circuit caps would be across the opamp output.
What I'm uncertain about is what value the output impedance of the opamp should be. I could make it 1K, or 47R, or something else, if it matters at all. Of course I can just test different options and see what effect it has.
Of course this method wouldn't give me any numerical values at all other than what I can determine from the scope traces. And I would need to have known good caps of various values to compare to. But I have a pretty good selection to start with.
I know this seems a bit "how ya doin", as Dave would say, but it seems that this method would tell me which caps I need to replace, which is really all I need to know.
What do you think?