For analog scopes, you can usually find name-brand equipment cheap. Do this. Preferably get a Tek. The reason is twofold. First, they were built to last, and these days only cost a few $$$ more. Second, the availability of parts and manuals is much better, which will be important if something does break. If you get a reasonably popular tek scope, you can be confident that in 10 years you will be able to find a similar enough model you can cannibalize it to make yours work.
An analog scope is a great tool, and one that can't be completely replaced by a low-end digital scope. It is particularly valuable as a learning tool, since there are fewer issues that can trip you up like aliasing at low sweep rates. However, if I had to pick between a basic digital scope and a basic analog scope as my only tool, I would take the any day. Some people will disagree with me, but I think that the ability to capture pre-trigger data and record single events more than outweigh all of the advantages of an analog scope. In truth it depends on the type of work you are doing and the signals you will look at -- it is just my preference. The other issue is that you can get a pretty nice used analog scope for much cheaper than a new budget DSO, so it isn't really a fair comparison.