Hakko FX-888D 230v vs ERSA i-CON Nano

[tooki]

what tha...  wraper is only trying to help, and made a video just to show you, tone, voice don't mean insult, have you ever think he can be tired, ie. many hours awake?
If all people was like wraper the world would be more friendly and helpfull 

I never said that I didn’t know how to remove them. I (and many others) said they’re difficult to remove. He wasn’t trying to be helpful, he was trying to prove us wrong, as he continues to do.

[KL27x]

Now i'm curious. Like what my accent sounds to native English person? All that was unscripted, and I barely ever have a chance to talk in English.

Speaking for myself, a classic, heavy Russian accent with the deep timbre and the faint sneer of pride/sarcasm/wit which is pretty much spot on the voice I imagine when reading Russian jokes. The sigh of resignation at the end is perfect. Of course, a large part of my experience is based on Boris and Natasha, James Bond movies, and Glow.

I wish I could borrow your voice for making videos. I have a voice only my mother could love.

[marck120]

Hi, sorry, I understand that this is an old topic, I read the whole discussion and it is very interesting, it is indisputable that in terms of performance the i-CON NANO is clearly superior to the hakko fx-888d, but the fx-888d has the reputation of being a real tank, as I read in this discussion it is difficult to find a broken one, in your opinion does the i con nano mk2 have the same build quality as the hakko fx-888dx ? it is difficult to predict the future but between the hakko and the nano which will have a longer life ? I have the impression that the nano is more delicate, perhaps because it has more sophisticated electronics, some have had problems with some error messages, Err 501, Err 8 etc..

[cosmicray]

Hi, sorry, I understand that this is an old topic, I read the whole discussion and it is very interesting, it is indisputable that in terms of performance the i-CON NANO is clearly superior to the hakko fx-888d, but the fx-888d has the reputation of being a real tank, as I read in this discussion it is difficult to find a broken one, in your opinion does the i con nano mk2 have the same build quality as the hakko fx-888dx ? it is difficult to predict the future but between the hakko and the nano which will have a longer life ? I have the impression that the nano is more delicate, perhaps because it has more sophisticated electronics, some have had problems with some error messages, Err 501, Err 8 etc..

I've had my 888D for almost 10 years. It keeps going and going and going. I should put a pair of rabbit ears on it.

[marck120]

Hi, sorry, I understand that this is an old topic, I read the whole discussion and it is very interesting, it is indisputable that in terms of performance the i-CON NANO is clearly superior to the hakko fx-888d, but the fx-888d has the reputation of being a real tank, as I read in this discussion it is difficult to find a broken one, in your opinion does the i con nano mk2 have the same build quality as the hakko fx-888dx ? it is difficult to predict the future but between the hakko and the nano which will have a longer life ? I have the impression that the nano is more delicate, perhaps because it has more sophisticated electronics, some have had problems with some error messages, Err 501, Err 8 etc..

I've had my 888D for almost 10 years. It keeps going and going and going. I should put a pair of rabbit ears on it.

I've had the Ersa i-CON NANO MK2 for about two days, I hope it will last me many years too, I really like the FX-888DX, especially because it's a very robust station, it was one of my main choices, I've had it in my cart for a long time.