Author Topic: Question about night vision technology  (Read 2686 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ben321Topic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 894
Question about night vision technology
« on: July 23, 2018, 04:57:21 am »
My question is about light intensifier tube based NV monoculars. I know that Gen0 is just an image converter tube, converting near-IR light into visible light. And I know that Gen2 (and higher) produces significant light amplification, of hundreds or even thousands of times. However, Gen1 is a bit of a mystery to me. I've often read that it has some light intensification properties, but I also know that Gen1 uses an external IR illuminator, and this suggests that it may have no light amplification (just like Gen0).

Can anybody here tell me if Gen1 night vision monoculars actually amplify light? And if so, by how much? And if not, then how does Gen1 differ from Gen0?
 

Offline tautech

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 28398
  • Country: nz
  • Taupaki Technologies Ltd. Siglent Distributor NZ.
    • Taupaki Technologies Ltd.
Re: Question about night vision technology
« Reply #1 on: July 23, 2018, 05:11:39 am »
You might get faster answers if you move this to the Thermal Imagery sub forum.
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/thermal-imaging/

Use the Move button at the bottom left of the page that only you, the OP can see.
Avid Rabid Hobbyist
Siglent Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@SiglentVideo/videos
 

Offline Ben321Topic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 894
Re: Question about night vision technology
« Reply #2 on: July 23, 2018, 06:20:02 am »
You might get faster answers if you move this to the Thermal Imagery sub forum.
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/thermal-imaging/

Use the Move button at the bottom left of the page that only you, the OP can see.

Thermal imaging is not the same as light intensifier night vision. Light intensifier night vision works with visible and near-IR wavelengths. Thermal imager works with longwave-IR wavelengths. It would be out of place in that section.
 

Offline PointyOintment

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 327
  • Country: ca
  • ↑ I scanned my face
Re: Question about night vision technology
« Reply #3 on: August 25, 2018, 07:48:35 am »
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night_vision_device#Generation_1_(GEN_I)

Quote
Generation 1 (GEN I)

First generation passive devices, introduced during the Vietnam War and patented by the US Army, were an adaptation of earlier active GEN 0 technology, and rely on ambient light instead of an infrared light source. Using an S-20 photocathode, their image intensifiers produce a light amplification of around 1,000×,[10] but are quite bulky and require moonlight to function properly.

Citation [10] links to https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/nvg.htm, which says

Quote
Generation I
Amplification: 1,000x


The early 1960's was witness to the beginning of passive night vision. Technological improvements included vacuum tight fused fiber optics for good center resolution and improved gain, multi-alkali photocathodes and fiber optic input & output windows. GEN I devices lacked the sensitivity and light amplification necessary to see below full moonlight, and were often staged or cascaded to improve gain. As a result, GEN I systems were large and cumbersome, less reliable, and relatively poor low light imagers. They were also characterized by streaking and distortion.

That page doesn't mention Generation 0, though Wikipedia does.
I refuse to use AD's LTspice or any other "free" software whose license agreement prohibits benchmarking it (which implies it's really bad) or publicly disclosing the existence of the agreement. Fortunately, I haven't agreed to that one, and those terms are public already.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf