EEVblog Electronics Community Forum

Products => Other Equipment & Products => Topic started by: coerrace on October 07, 2016, 12:22:33 am

Title: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: coerrace on October 07, 2016, 12:22:33 am
I think is time to change my soldering station and I wanted to ask suggestions about what could be best to buy between a Hakko FX-100 or a Metcal MX 500 or 5200.

I saw some information and I see appears the Hakko does similar kind of induction than metcal and also you can use the metcal hands with tips on hakko. I want to select also the best choice in variety of tips and upgrade factors. Also what could be the best option long lasting and with great quality and performance. The price always is important but in the case the best option is a little more expensive in general (with tips, accessories and so on)  is not important really considering the best option is worth the price.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: zapta on October 07, 2016, 01:03:57 am
The MX500 is long lasting because its schematic is available and it's is made with 'discrete' off the shelf ICs (that is, no MCU, firmware, etc).

http://scopetechniques.com/Metcal/MX-500P-11.pdf (http://scopetechniques.com/Metcal/MX-500P-11.pdf)

Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: helius on October 07, 2016, 01:17:58 am
The MX500 is long lasting because its schematic is available and it's is made with 'discrete' off the shelf ICs (that is, no MCU, firmware, etc).
That's the old MX-500. The new MX-500 is MCU controlled.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: coerrace on October 07, 2016, 01:23:55 am
Then is more suggested the metcal better than the hakko fx 100?
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: zapta on October 07, 2016, 04:10:13 am
Then is more suggested the metcal better than the hakko fx 100?

I don't recall anybody here reporting on the fx 100 so there is not enough data to compare.

The metcal has a large selection of cartridges, from both Metcal and thermaltronics (a spin off of ex Metcal employees).

Since you are in the US, you can have good deal on used Metcals on ebay (I got a used MX500 power supply from ebay and a new handpiece and stand from Amazon).  E.g. this one (too good to be true?)   

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Metcal-MX-500P-11-2-Port-SMT-Soldering-Rework-Station-2-Wands-/131962445716?hash=item1eb9931f94:g:nlIAAOSwLnBX5IOT (http://www.ebay.com/itm/Metcal-MX-500P-11-2-Port-SMT-Soldering-Rework-Station-2-Wands-/131962445716?hash=item1eb9931f94:g:nlIAAOSwLnBX5IOT)
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: coerrace on October 07, 2016, 11:35:08 am
Yes I see that the FX-100 I don't see so much information just some reviews from buyers in amazon and other stores and they say is great but is limited. I saw also some people want to plug the FX-100 tips in metcal and honestly I don't know what special things have the tips of FX-100 because looking the tips for soldering and rework for metcal like you mention there are a lot and I think there is no need to plug a FX-100 in metcal maybe people want to do that for the price only.

I will go for metcal.

Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: helius on October 07, 2016, 12:50:17 pm
The Hakko FX-100 and Metcal stations use the same basic technology and their handpieces are compatible (they both use coaxial F connectors). The shapes of the tips differ: the Hakko FX-1001 handpiece fits T31 series tips, while the Metcal RM3E fits STTC series tips. To use Hakko tips on a Metcal station you need an FX-1001, which costs about $100.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: zapta on October 07, 2016, 01:21:40 pm


The model I have is their bottom of the line MFR1100 series, 60W 450kHz model. I think this is a wonderful soldering iron, way better than me previous Weller WES51.

The ease of changing tips is a great advantage IMO. With the WES51 I rarely changed tips because of the hassle.

Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: coerrace on October 07, 2016, 01:51:15 pm
Yes I see that metcal sounds very good and there are a lot of options and tips including for reworking.

About this:

The Hakko FX-100 and Metcal stations use the same basic technology and their handpieces are compatible (they both use coaxial F connectors). The shapes of the tips differ: the Hakko FX-1001 handpiece fits T31 series tips, while the Metcal RM3E fits STTC series tips. To use Hakko tips on a Metcal station you need an FX-1001, which costs about $100.

I understand Hakko FX-100 tips can be used in metcal with the FX-1001 but just a simple question is there any big advantage in Hakko FX-100 Tips to justify the buy of a FX-1001? I ask because I see a very big catalog of tips on metcal and I don´t understand what reason could be in buy a FX-1001 if metcal has everything.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: GreyWoolfe on October 07, 2016, 06:11:50 pm
I can't help on the FX-100 as I have the FX-951, but I do have a MX500.  Very nice piece of equipment.  If you can score one, you will enjoy using it.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: coerrace on October 07, 2016, 07:38:52 pm
Yes metcal is the rule I looked everywhere and appears very solid.

I was trying to catch one MX500 but looking I found one option of 5200 with tweezers and the price is almost the same than the MX 500 but for the 5200 of course new with twezers. If I buy all by separate for the 500 cross the line of the offer with the 5200 including twezers. The thing is about the space I see the 5200 is a little bigger than 500 but is a great deal if I take the 5200 instead the 500 I guess or not? Or is bigger and uncomfortable to use the 5200?

And another question a hot air only station suggested what could be or brand I was looking one tenma and it has excellent reviews. For the hot air is not necessary an excepcional brand that is the reason I want the metcal the hot air i just want to use like a backup in special occasions.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: mikeselectricstuff on October 07, 2016, 07:44:17 pm
I wouldn't bother with tweezers- two irons, one in each hand, is much more useable for removing chip parts ( obviously needs a dual output PSU like the 5200), and also means you have a spare iron.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: coerrace on October 07, 2016, 08:02:56 pm
Excellent I will order the 5200 and twezers now and some tips.

Thank you for the orientation if someone knows an acceptable hot air station would be great hear suggestions.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: nanofrog on October 07, 2016, 11:58:37 pm
...[snip]...if someone knows an acceptable hot air station would be great hear suggestions.
You might also want to take a look at a Quick 861DW (1kW, digital interface w/ lots of features). Very comparable to a Hakko FR-810, but at a fraction of the price ($235), and it even has an intuitive UI (unlike the Hakko  :palm:). And it's well built.

Plenty of info here in the forum, including photos (other models are the 861DS and 861DA for the EU & UK markets respectively; all that changes is the transformer & power cord).
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: coerrace on October 08, 2016, 12:36:30 am
...[snip]...if someone knows an acceptable hot air station would be great hear suggestions.
You might also want to take a look at a Quick 861DW (1kW, digital interface w/ lots of features). Very comparable to a Hakko FR-810, but at a fraction of the price ($235), and it even has an intuitive UI (unlike the Hakko  :palm:). And it's well built.

Plenty of info here in the forum, including photos (other models are the 861DS and 861DA for the EU & UK markets respectively; all that changes is the transformer & power cord).

Looks very interesting for the price I was looking the Tenma 21-10125 but 1kw in the Quick 861DW and that price is worth to test honestly. And I see also the Quick has a lot of nozzles for desoldering and reworking wow. Nice tip!!!
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: nanofrog on October 08, 2016, 03:01:41 am
Looks very interesting for the price I was looking the Tenma 21-10125 but 1kw in the Quick 861DW and that price is worth to test honestly. And I see also the Quick has a lot of nozzles for desoldering and reworking wow. Nice tip!!!
You're welcome.  :)

FWIW, Tenma is a brand name owned by Farnell (Newark/Element 14 in the US, and also own MCM here in the states), and it's lowest bidder type of stuff. Not that it doesn't have it's place, but I wouldn't call it anywhere near top quality. For disclosure, I own a Tenma branded hot air preheater; does what I need on the rare occasions I have to pull it off the shelf. But for a primary tool, look elsewhere IMHO.

As per the nozzles for the Quick 861, they're friction fit rather than screw clamp. Makes it a lot easier & quicker to romove (tool built into the stand). But you will need a silicone rubber pad to install different ones when the unit is running/hot IME. Unfortunately this isn't included, but at least they're inexpensive (i.e. Hakko B2300 (http://www.tequipment.net/HakkoB2300.html)).  :-+

You'll also find the 3 nozzles included in the 861 will cover just about any job you have. In fact, making or purchasing shields/protectors from thin sheet metal will do better than specialty nozzles IME (ready-made protectors (http://www.jbctools.com/cataleg.php?search=protector&x=0&y=0) by JBC); especially on tightly packed PCB's. JBC also makes vacuum tripods (http://www.jbctools.com/cataleg.php?search=tripod&x=0&y=0) and protectors with vacuum plungers attached (extractors (http://www.jbctools.com/extractors-protector-525-x-14-mm-product-554-category-9-menu-70.html)), so a modified aquarium pump will lift the chip once it's been desoldered.

They're ^ not cheap, but not horrendous either (though if you need a lot, they will add up, just as tips do; but at least they don't wear out  ;D). For example, the shields/protectors run ~$20 per, extractors ~$40 per, and the stand-alone tripods that straddle the shield/protectors ~$45 per (the legs rotate around the shaft, so are flexible regarding placement).
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: coerrace on October 08, 2016, 03:21:25 am
Now I found thermaltronics tips supposed for metcal also but cheaper this is real? Same quality of tips from metcal? What I was reading about thermaltronics that was founded by old employees of metcal. But what you think of thermaltronics tips? The tips has the same quality of metcal or is suggested go with metcal brand?
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: zapta on October 08, 2016, 05:18:23 am
Now I found thermaltronics tips supposed for metcal also but cheaper this is real? Same quality of tips from metcal? What I was reading about thermaltronics that was founded by old employees of metcal. But what you think of thermaltronics tips? The tips has the same quality of metcal or is suggested go with metcal brand?
One of my tips is from thetmaltronics and as far as I can tell it works just as well. My subjective opinion is that they are on par with Metcal.

Their claim for fame is a color mark on the cartridge that inductes the temperature group of that tip. They even got a patent for this trivial 'innovation' in China.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: mikeselectricstuff on October 08, 2016, 09:43:17 am
The two tips I use 90% of the time are Thermaltronics and I can't remember when I last changed either - must be at least a couple of years of daily use

Their version of the SMTC-1147 is better than Metcal's as it has sharper corners, making it good for getting right up to the joints when reflowing QFNs - you can actually drag-solder QFNs with it if the pads come out about 0.5mm or so from the package outline.
 
 
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: GreyWoolfe on October 08, 2016, 11:45:14 am
2 of my tips are Thermaltronics and they work just the same as the Metcal tips.  Try to look up forum member denbo32, he has offered EEVBloggers discounts in the past on the Thermaltronics tips.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: coerrace on October 08, 2016, 03:56:27 pm
2 of my tips are Thermaltronics and they work just the same as the Metcal tips.  Try to look up forum member denbo32, he has offered EEVBloggers discounts in the past on the Thermaltronics tips.

Thank you
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: Dubbie on October 08, 2016, 09:15:16 pm
I have the same Metcal as Blueskull. When I got it, it was like every soldering job got 10x easier. And the 5 second startup from cold is amazing!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: chucksticks on October 10, 2016, 03:17:26 am
This article was the most helpful to me regarding the FX-100:
http://www.stratesysgroup.com/HakkoFX100.html (http://www.stratesysgroup.com/HakkoFX100.html)

It's advertised there that hakko's fx100 is better than the metcal stuff.

Cold start time can be seen here:
https://youtu.be/sj5NLW52TFU?t=44s (https://youtu.be/sj5NLW52TFU?t=44s)
Between FX-100's approx. 7secs and metcal's 4secs start time, I'd not sure that it matters as most of the time I won't need to be ready to solder something that fast from cold start.

I'm too looking in the market for a more advanced soldering system for my R&D type projects but I've about settled on getting a temperature adjustable iron since I want to run my stuff at lower temp's (around 300C or less; especially if I have a preheater system). I've been looking around for as much info. on the fx-100 as I could and I'll tell you there's not much out there. From what I've gathered, I think the FX-100 is about 2 years old. They should have something up their sleeves for trying to enter the curie point iron market so late.

The tips are nicely priced and with decent variety, ranging from 0.1mm conical to 4.5mm knife and 2.8mm 'hoof' bevel:
https://www.hakkousa.com/products/soldering-iron-tips/t31-series-fx-100.html (https://www.hakkousa.com/products/soldering-iron-tips/t31-series-fx-100.html)
The metcal's have more tips I believe and at more temperatures (particularly going as low as 315C) but you can put in requests to hakko for new tip designs if they don't have the ones you need already.

As for my experience, I've never touched a hakko iron before but I've used a metcal ps-5200 at work. Like some people have said, it's like a tank. The power supply's body is full metal. The iron's themselves are very lightweight (aluminum I think) and hollow but the cable is heavier and can drag it down. It can be unnerving to hot swap tips as it's driving alot of power  and I can feel it get too hot very fast through the silicone pads.


Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: Someone on October 10, 2016, 10:24:14 am
It can be unnerving to hot swap tips as it's driving alot of power  and I can feel it get too hot very fast through the silicone pads.
Turn it off when changing tips!
Quote from: Metcal
1. Make sure the system is turned off.
2. Pull out the cartridge using the Cartridge Removal Pad (MX-CP1). NOTE:
THE TIP CARTRIDGE MAY BE HOT. DO NOT USE METAL TOOLS
(PLIERS, ETC) TO REMOVE CARTRIDGES!
3. Push a new cartridge into the handle.
4. Place hand-piece(s) into associated work stand(s).
5. Push the power switch “ON”. The new cartridge will heat up to temperature
quickly.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: coerrace on October 10, 2016, 05:19:26 pm
This article was the most helpful to me regarding the FX-100:
http://www.stratesysgroup.com/HakkoFX100.html (http://www.stratesysgroup.com/HakkoFX100.html)

It's advertised there that hakko's fx100 is better than the metcal stuff.

Cold start time can be seen here:
https://youtu.be/sj5NLW52TFU?t=44s (https://youtu.be/sj5NLW52TFU?t=44s)
Between FX-100's approx. 7secs and metcal's 4secs start time, I'd not sure that it matters as most of the time I won't need to be ready to solder something that fast from cold start.

I'm too looking in the market for a more advanced soldering system for my R&D type projects but I've about settled on getting a temperature adjustable iron since I want to run my stuff at lower temp's (around 300C or less; especially if I have a preheater system). I've been looking around for as much info. on the fx-100 as I could and I'll tell you there's not much out there. From what I've gathered, I think the FX-100 is about 2 years old. They should have something up their sleeves for trying to enter the curie point iron market so late.

The tips are nicely priced and with decent variety, ranging from 0.1mm conical to 4.5mm knife and 2.8mm 'hoof' bevel:
https://www.hakkousa.com/products/soldering-iron-tips/t31-series-fx-100.html (https://www.hakkousa.com/products/soldering-iron-tips/t31-series-fx-100.html)
The metcal's have more tips I believe and at more temperatures (particularly going as low as 315C) but you can put in requests to hakko for new tip designs if they don't have the ones you need already.

As for my experience, I've never touched a hakko iron before but I've used a metcal ps-5200 at work. Like some people have said, it's like a tank. The power supply's body is full metal. The iron's themselves are very lightweight (aluminum I think) and hollow but the cable is heavier and can drag it down. It can be unnerving to hot swap tips as it's driving alot of power  and I can feel it get too hot very fast through the silicone pads.

Yes I'm nervous waiting my metcal I bought the same like yours with twezers and yes there are a lot of tips/cartridges and with thermaltronics much better. I saw in thermaltronics one tip of .1mm without the need of the MX-H2-UF and I see also that between thermaltronics and metcal companies together there are a lot of options and there is no need to look elsewhere if you have a metcal.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: mikeselectricstuff on October 10, 2016, 08:23:19 pm
It can be unnerving to hot swap tips as it's driving alot of power  and I can feel it get too hot very fast through the silicone pads.
Turn it off when changing tips!
Quote from: Metcal
1. Make sure the system is turned off.
2. Pull out the cartridge using the Cartridge Removal Pad (MX-CP1). NOTE:
THE TIP CARTRIDGE MAY BE HOT. DO NOT USE METAL TOOLS
(PLIERS, ETC) TO REMOVE CARTRIDGES!
3. Push a new cartridge into the handle.
4. Place hand-piece(s) into associated work stand(s).
5. Push the power switch “ON”. The new cartridge will heat up to temperature
quickly.
No need. The later psus
,5000 and later, auto-reset. You just get used to swapping quickly-you can let go as soon as the tip is seated
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: Someone on October 10, 2016, 10:05:45 pm
It can be unnerving to hot swap tips as it's driving alot of power  and I can feel it get too hot very fast through the silicone pads.
Turn it off when changing tips!
Quote from: Metcal
1. Make sure the system is turned off.
2. Pull out the cartridge using the Cartridge Removal Pad (MX-CP1). NOTE:
THE TIP CARTRIDGE MAY BE HOT. DO NOT USE METAL TOOLS
(PLIERS, ETC) TO REMOVE CARTRIDGES!
3. Push a new cartridge into the handle.
4. Place hand-piece(s) into associated work stand(s).
5. Push the power switch “ON”. The new cartridge will heat up to temperature
quickly.
No need. The later psus
,5000 and later, auto-reset. You just get used to swapping quickly-you can let go as soon as the tip is seated
You can change tips without turning off, but those are the instructions for the current 5000/5200 series, and the above is taken verbatim from their user manuals. This isn't the ass covering over careful approach like the instructions for drills that say to remove the battery before changing bits, its the more practical case of not trying to change bits while the drill is still operating (although you could). Tuning off the power both recommended by the manufacturer and a sensible way to avoid putting excess heat into the tip changing pad.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: mikeselectricstuff on October 10, 2016, 10:14:02 pm
You'd have to hold the tip way longer than necessary to get any heat into the pad. Also, the MX5000 takes a second or two to reset anyway.
The power switch on the 5000 isn't the best so by turning on & off every time you're bound to shorten its life.
I never turn off and change tips multiple times a day - it just isn't an issue
 
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: Someone on October 11, 2016, 12:23:54 am
You'd have to hold the tip way longer than necessary to get any heat into the pad. Also, the MX5000 takes a second or two to reset anyway.
The power switch on the 5000 isn't the best so by turning on & off every time you're bound to shorten its life.
I never turn off and change tips multiple times a day - it just isn't an issue
You can, its not recommended by the manufacturer and some of us feel its uncomfortably warm. Whats your problem with that? Recommending people don't turn it off is how we've ended up here.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: helius on October 11, 2016, 03:16:10 am
If the Metcal requires the power to be off when changing tips, then it is notably inferior to both JBC and Pace.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: Someone on October 11, 2016, 03:42:12 am
If the Metcal requires the power to be off when changing tips, then it is notably inferior to both JBC and Pace.
The quick change mechanism on the JBC stands is much better all round, those resistive stations have their advantages to be sure. But for instance Thermaltronics also include the warning to turn off the power supply when changing tips but most users don't bother:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6L191uQ36bo (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6L191uQ36bo)
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: mikeselectricstuff on October 11, 2016, 10:50:35 am
If the Metcal requires the power to be off when changing tips, then it is notably inferior to both JBC and Pace.
It doesn't. If there was any real issue the PSU would be designed to not auto-reset.
The older Metcals didn't auto-reset, but that's probably because they were dumb supplies with no MCU.
If you're paranoid about heat then you can grasp the tip far enough away from the rne that heat is negligible
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: Monkeh on October 11, 2016, 01:54:22 pm
How power cycling becomes such an argument I'll never know.

*resumes flipping power switch on bulletproof old Metcal*
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: zapta on October 11, 2016, 02:47:19 pm
How power cycling becomes such an argument I'll never know.

*resumes flipping power switch on bulletproof old Metcal*

Yes, a non issue. The requirements of manual resume is for safety, in case you insert a cold tip with bare hands, it would burn your fingers in no time.

A momentary resume push button would be nice though.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: coerrace on October 15, 2016, 10:55:18 pm
Anyone know or suggest a cable extension to use between the hand MX-H1-AV and the metcal 5200? Where I will have located the unit I need only like a 15-30 inches more than the default cable maybe. I see the metcal factory cable is a kind of F connector but maybe could work with a simple coaxial cable for TV M-F extensions? This is the reason why ask to know if maybe there is a suggested brand or any recommendation to extend the original factory cable.

Thank you
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: GreyWoolfe on October 16, 2016, 12:04:09 am
Anyone know or suggest a cable extension to use between the hand MX-H1-AV and the metcal 5200? Where I will have located the unit I need only like a 15-30 inches more than the default cable maybe. I see the metcal factory cable is a kind of F connector but maybe could work with a simple coaxial cable for TV M-F extensions? This is the reason why ask to know if maybe there is a suggested brand or any recommendation to extend the original factory cable.

Thank you

Is the unit in another room?  My problem on my Metcal MX-500 is the cable is TOO long.  I wish it and the cable for my Hakko FX-951 were shorter.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: coerrace on October 16, 2016, 12:49:50 am
Yes not exactly other room but a little distant. The unit is located in one intended area for that where I have other tools but the work table is not there and I only to extend just a little.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: chucksticks on October 16, 2016, 07:15:13 am
Anyone know or suggest a cable extension to use between the hand MX-H1-AV and the metcal 5200? Where I will have located the unit I need only like a 15-30 inches more than the default cable maybe. I see the metcal factory cable is a kind of F connector but maybe could work with a simple coaxial cable for TV M-F extensions? This is the reason why ask to know if maybe there is a suggested brand or any recommendation to extend the original factory cable.

Thank you

Here's an interesting thread on DIY Metcal here on eevblog:
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/projects/diy-metcal-13-56-mhz-rf-supply/?all (https://www.eevblog.com/forum/projects/diy-metcal-13-56-mhz-rf-supply/?all)

Towards reply #164 is when they discuss some about the cable although I haven't read through the thread yet.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: coerrace on October 16, 2016, 12:50:20 pm
Anyone know or suggest a cable extension to use between the hand MX-H1-AV and the metcal 5200? Where I will have located the unit I need only like a 15-30 inches more than the default cable maybe. I see the metcal factory cable is a kind of F connector but maybe could work with a simple coaxial cable for TV M-F extensions? This is the reason why ask to know if maybe there is a suggested brand or any recommendation to extend the original factory cable.

Thank you


Here's an interesting thread on DIY Metcal here on eevblog:
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/projects/diy-metcal-13-56-mhz-rf-supply/?all (https://www.eevblog.com/forum/projects/diy-metcal-13-56-mhz-rf-supply/?all)

Towards reply #164 is when they discuss some about the cable although I haven't read through the thread yet.

Thank you
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: connectionvalidationman on March 08, 2017, 09:29:12 pm
The Metcal iron cord is 72 inches for a reason. The cord length is based on the physics of the operating frequency and its wavelength. You could make a short extension and most likely not affect performance, but make it too long and the system may not meet your soldering expectations.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: Monkeh on March 08, 2017, 09:39:03 pm
The Metcal iron cord is 72 inches for a reason. The cord length is based on the physics of the operating frequency and its wavelength. You could make a short extension and most likely not affect performance, but make it too long and the system may not meet your soldering expectations.

It's 72 inches because 72 inches is six feet, and six feet is a nominal length in the US.. The exact length of the cable is almost certainly not a factor in performance.

They made switches which add at least a couple feet to the length - nobody seems to have performance issues with those.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: macboy on March 13, 2017, 04:53:15 pm
The Metcal iron cord is 72 inches for a reason. The cord length is based on the physics of the operating frequency and its wavelength. You could make a short extension and most likely not affect performance, but make it too long and the system may not meet your soldering expectations.

It's 72 inches because 72 inches is six feet, and six feet is a nominal length in the US.. The exact length of the cable is almost certainly not a factor in performance.

They made switches which add at least a couple feet to the length - nobody seems to have performance issues with those.
The wavelength of the ~13 MHz ish signal in coax is many times longer than the ~ 2 m cable. I agree that a person could extend with some 75 ohm coax and F connectors without issue.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: Reckless on October 04, 2021, 09:47:05 pm
I have a MX500 and its not as nice as the MX5200.  Thinking about buying a FX-100 as its much cheaper.  Not sure if its worth double the price for a metcal if they are both using same technology.  Is it same level of power output? 
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: helius on October 05, 2021, 07:32:14 pm
I have a MX500 and its not as nice as the MX5200.  Thinking about buying a FX-100 as its much cheaper.  Not sure if its worth double the price for a metcal if they are both using same technology.  Is it same level of power output? 
Power output comparisons are especially difficult for induction systems, but the MX5200 datasheet says it puts 80 watts into two channels simultaneously. The Hakko FX-100 datasheet says it puts 50 watts into one channel. The FX-100 has some kind of temperature boost setting, which gives it a little more functionality compared to the Metcal. However, it also has Hakko's well-known awkward and overcomplicated button interface (as on the FX-951, FR-810, FM-206...) which many operators will want to throw at the wall.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: Reckless on October 05, 2021, 08:23:00 pm
I ordered one FX-100 and will see how it compares to the MX5200.  Wondering about the Quick 202D model as its super cheap but don't think its true induction soldering iron. 
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: thm_w on October 05, 2021, 08:50:55 pm
Power output comparisons are especially difficult for induction systems, but the MX5200 datasheet says it puts 80 watts into two channels simultaneously. The Hakko FX-100 datasheet says it puts 50 watts into one channel. The FX-100 has some kind of temperature boost setting, which gives it a little more functionality compared to the Metcal. However, it also has Hakko's well-known awkward and overcomplicated button interface (as on the FX-951, FR-810, FM-206...) which many operators will want to throw at the wall.

Its 40Wx2 or 80Wx1.
The difference between 40 or 50W and 80W is not much, unless you are working with high thermal demand applications. General soldering will be using <20W.

I ordered one FX-100 and will see how it compares to the MX5200.  Wondering about the Quick 202D model as its super cheap but don't think its true induction soldering iron. 

Quick202D uses true induction, but its 400kHz so not directly compatible with the 13MHz Fx100/mx5200.
Also the heater coil is not in the tip, its in the handle. Similar to the budget tips on the latest Metcal stations, which are also 400kHz.

Clone Hakko tips are incredibly cheap, $10/ea. Metcal tips are about $20/ea.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: Reckless on October 06, 2021, 12:00:06 am
We do solder brass parts on the circuit boards. 

Does frequency matter?  I checked my solder robot came with Quick 205H 150W soldering stations.  I need to buy different wand (can't find part number).  I think its induction heating.  Not sure what H means and what difference is between 202/203/204/205.  Does Quick have a manufacturer website?  I came across a poland website but was missing a number of models. 
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: thm_w on October 06, 2021, 05:16:39 pm
I don't think frequency is really that important on its own.
Here is a PS5000 for $175: https://www.ebay.ca/itm/255165318121 (https://www.ebay.ca/itm/255165318121)
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: Reckless on October 06, 2021, 08:30:44 pm
What is the difference between PS-5000 and PS-5200? 
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: thm_w on October 06, 2021, 09:12:43 pm
What is the difference between PS-5000 and PS-5200?

PS5200 can power both ports at the same time, PS5000 only one port at a time.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: SteveyG on October 07, 2021, 03:31:59 pm
We do solder brass parts on the circuit boards. 

Does frequency matter?  I checked my solder robot came with Quick 205H 150W soldering stations.  I need to buy different wand (can't find part number).  I think its induction heating.  Not sure what H means and what difference is between 202/203/204/205.  Does Quick have a manufacturer website?  I came across a poland website but was missing a number of models.

The 13.56 MHz systems have the advantage that the handpiece and cartridges are much more compact due to the smaller size of the induction heater, as a result there's also gains in terms of thermal response. It also supports higher power delivery.
I don't know how much is down to the specific cartridge design, but you can definitely tell the difference between the 13.56 MHz and 450 kHz but for normal soldering it's not really an issue.


Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: SteveyG on October 07, 2021, 03:34:03 pm
What is the difference between PS-5000 and PS-5200?

PS5200 can power both ports at the same time, PS5000 only one port at a time.

As above, this can be handy for de-soldering with two handpieces.
The tweezers and de-solder gun both only use one port, but two standard handpieces can be a bit more versatile.
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: labjr on October 09, 2021, 04:28:37 pm
I've read a couple user complaints about Thermaltronics tip wear. Metcal are supposed to have a lifetime warranty. Although, I'm not sure exactly what it covers. Maybe only manufacturing defects?

I don't think the Quick induction iron is compatible with Metcal whatsoever. It appears to be some hybrid design with induction and thermocouple since it's adjustable. Not sure what advantage it would have over any other design with a thermocouple? 
Title: Re: Suggestions Hakko FX-100 vs metcal MX500 or MX5200
Post by: SteveyG on October 11, 2021, 08:18:21 pm
I've read a couple user complaints about Thermaltronics tip wear. Metcal are supposed to have a lifetime warranty. Although, I'm not sure exactly what it covers. Maybe only manufacturing defects?

I don't think the Quick induction iron is compatible with Metcal whatsoever. It appears to be some hybrid design with induction and thermocouple since it's adjustable. Not sure what advantage it would have over any other design with a thermocouple?

As I understand it, the induction heating is more responsive. You're heating only the low thermal resistance core which is directly connected to the tip rather than the heating element and everything surrounding it. Certainly I would say the Metcal GT120 soldering station which uses induction + thermocouple seems a lot more responsive than a standard resistive heating element.

Mike said he's been using Thermaltronics tips without any notable difference in quality.

Metcal cartridge warranty is that the heater will outlast the tip plating. Generally that means if the heater fails, it will be replaced, though I've still got cartridges 10+ years old.