It is much what space that is available and how demanding needed tuning stability is and how important need for high efficiency is and actual need for impedance ratio transformation.
If the antenna have an very high or very low impedance relative to needed impedance, say in ratio 50 or more will discrete component losses be critical.Smaller is in general not better from efficiency view but it is better in terms of low VSWR.
VSWR looks better but is less effective antenna for smaller inductor.Capacitors have not same type of problem and are in general less critical in its value related to its size.
Antenna efficiency is mainly of interest when available battery power is an limited factor. 50% higher efficiency and TX power can be reduced in same amount without losing performance.
If available antenna space is small -> increased need for tuning - > more critical doing a good component type and topology selection.Earpice and headset are typical applications where a very small battery should last many hours, have almost no space avilable for tuning components or antenna.
As a comparing example, where selecting type of component have high impact on resulting VSWR did I select a groundplane 80x10 mm with an antenna in short end. Antenna is a 5 mm long wire. Did select some common inductor types from Murata and did select optimized values for each type for a simple network, a indcutor and a capacitor in parallel to ground.
For some inductor types can another type of topology be to prefer and antenna untuned impedance is a bit extreme due to it is short but have seen much worse for real headsets.
Yellow curve in Smith chart and its table shows measured untuned antenna impedance.