Author Topic: Distributed element filters/RF stuff solder mask  (Read 2823 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline darthtonyTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 22
  • Country: gr
Distributed element filters/RF stuff solder mask
« on: March 12, 2016, 12:40:10 pm »
Why do distributed element filters, and generallly RF stuff on a PCB have some sort of gold plating and no solder mask on them? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_element_filter
 

Offline jeremy

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1079
  • Country: au
Re: Distributed element filters/RF stuff solder mask
« Reply #1 on: March 12, 2016, 01:19:26 pm »
I can only guess, but the soldermask will change the average dielectric constant of the region, and thus will affect the trace characteristic impedance at high frequencies.

From my quick googling, see:

http://www.icd.com.au/articles/Stackup_Planning_AN2011_2.pdf
http://www.sigcon.com/Pubs/edn/PassivationandSolderMask.htm

Perhaps it is more difficult to control the thickness of the soldermask layer than it is the shape of the traces.
 

Offline darthtonyTopic starter

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 22
  • Country: gr
Re: Distributed element filters/RF stuff solder mask
« Reply #2 on: March 12, 2016, 03:29:28 pm »
That sounds reasonable, thanks!
 

Online tggzzz

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 19491
  • Country: gb
  • Numbers, not adjectives
    • Having fun doing more, with less
Re: Distributed element filters/RF stuff solder mask
« Reply #3 on: March 12, 2016, 05:30:57 pm »
Firstly it will be lossy, which also translates into reduced Q in filters.

Secondly the material will be variable, and the thickness will be variable, which translates in to frequency deviations.
There are lies, damned lies, statistics - and ADC/DAC specs.
Glider pilot's aphorism: "there is no substitute for span". Retort: "There is a substitute: skill+imagination. But you can buy span".
Having fun doing more, with less
 

Offline nctnico

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 26906
  • Country: nl
    • NCT Developments
Re: Distributed element filters/RF stuff solder mask
« Reply #4 on: March 12, 2016, 07:16:28 pm »
The soldermask isn't always left off. IMHO there is not much use in not having a solder mask because the etching tolerance will be as worse as the variation in the solder mask layer.
There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope.
 

Offline KJDS

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2442
  • Country: gb
    • my website holding page
Re: Distributed element filters/RF stuff solder mask
« Reply #5 on: March 12, 2016, 08:13:23 pm »
The only reason to lose it is loss. I've never measured any other difference.

Offline Dago

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 659
  • Country: fi
    • Electronics blog about whatever I happen to build!
Re: Distributed element filters/RF stuff solder mask
« Reply #6 on: March 15, 2016, 06:15:28 am »
It increases loss and is not as controllable thus affecting the characteristics of the filter in a hard to predict way. At high GHz stuff it can also act as a waveguide and cause rather interesting problems.
Come and check my projects at http://www.dgkelectronics.com ! I also tweet as https://twitter.com/DGKelectronics
 

Offline LukeW

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 686
Re: Distributed element filters/RF stuff solder mask
« Reply #7 on: March 17, 2016, 06:12:10 am »
In addition to the facts posted above, it looks cool :)
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf