Electronics > RF, Microwave, Ham Radio
Matching an antenna and a chip pin to 50ohm
Koen:
Hello,
up to now, I only had to match an antenna to a well-defined 50ohm port.
For this occasion, the pin of a chip also requires to be matched to 50ohm. The datasheet reads : "The LNA input requires two to three discrete components for input matching. Adjust these components values to provide a 50ohm input impedance".
Now, do I match the antenna on one side, match the pin on the other side then later join both sides with a 0 ohm resistor ? As in this schematic :
If it is so and none more adventurous, is there a way to verify the good matching of the whole circuit by probing somewhere ? I'll explain myself :
when both sides are unconnected by the missing zero ohm resistor :
* probing "ANT test pin" yields a RL S11 at 1GHz of -20,
* probing "LNA test pin" yields a RL S11 at 1GHz of -20.
* great !when both sides are then connected by a zero ohm resistor :
* probing "LNA RF_In pin" yields a moved center frequency around 700MHz. I would have expected it to show RL S11 at 1GHz of -20, maybe is it the influence of the LNA internals ?
Is it maybe normal, should I probe somewhere else, should I simply trust that both sides of the uniting 0ohm resistor where correctly matched and leave it to that ?
Thank you very much, Koen
uncle_bob:
Hi
If you have the S parameter data for the LNA, you plug that into your math and out comes a matching network. As for checking it, the issue is that the LNA's best noise performance and it's best match performance are likely not the same thing. It's easy(r) to test for match. It's not quite so easy to test for noise figure via an antenna.
The "normal" approach is to do the math and put in a circuit. A lucky intern then gets to try some changes while observing signal to noise over a live circuit. The swap out / capacitor bump process may or may not improve things much.
Even more exciting: your antenna may not really be 50 ohms....
Bob
Koen:
Hello,
and thank you for your answer which I haven't really understood.
To reduce my first post, I'd like to ask :
* is optimizing the value of the VNA S11 Return Loss on the LNA matching test pin the correct way to match the LNA pin ?
* is connecting two 50ohm matched blocks (matched antenna + matched pin) with a solder blob or 0ohm resistor correct ? Or is there a trap ?
I do not have access to the LNA output port so can't run an S21 transmission test, sorry.
Thank you,
Koen
uncle_bob:
--- Quote from: Koen on March 15, 2016, 11:23:11 pm ---Hello,
and thank you for your answer which I haven't really understood.
To reduce my first post, I'd like to ask :
* is optimizing the value of the VNA S11 Return Loss on the LNA matching test pin the correct way to match the LNA pin ?
* is connecting two 50ohm matched blocks (matched antenna + matched pin) with a solder blob or 0ohm resistor correct ? Or is there a trap ?
I do not have access to the LNA output port so can't run an S21 transmission test, sorry.
Thank you,
Koen
--- End quote ---
Hi
No matching the VNA return loss S11 is *not* the way it is done.
No, connecting two "50 ohm" pads is *not* how it works.
====
The optimum noise figure operating point is where you match the LNA at. The S11 match guarantees that you put the maximum power into the LNA. That also guarantees that there is significant loss in the source impedance. That limits the achievable noise figure.
A simple example:
I have a 1V 50 ohm source. By the "rules" of 50 ohm sources, that is a 2V voltage followed by a 50 ohm resistor. If I match it, I get 1V into the amplifier. If I have a "high impedance" load, I get 2V into the amplifier. If the amplifier has 1uV of noise, the signal to noise is twice as good in the "high impedance" case.
At RF things are not quite as simple as "high Z". The process is a bit more complex. You still have a match point that is not the same as the S11 match point.
The 50 ohm to 50 ohm thing is a little more complex. The process is essentially building a custom filter that achieves the correct impedance transformation. Unfortunately, just tacking filter sections directly to each other does not work. If you calculate a third order filter and compare it to a second order filter and a first order filter .... there is no simple relation between them. You need to directly calculate the proper filter.
Sorry, but there are no trivial shortcuts. You need to do it correctly. The only simple shortcut is to just connect the antenna directly with no match. You then have a less than perfect system. It probably works.
Bob
Koen:
Thank you, I found this by opening a commercial module :
I do not understand "The 50 ohm to 50 ohm thing is a little more complex." part. I assumed the RF industry standard was to connect a 50ohm antenna to a 50ohm receiver which would be an equivalent ?
Now, if this isn't how its done, would you please have pointers on how to do it ?
Thank you very much,
Koen
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version