NanoVNA Custom Software

[joeqsmith]

On discussion groups - you only owe people civil, related responses, or you get reported for acting hostile.   
So, that's what you get.    So, continue all you wish.

You actually wasted the admin's time for my calling out your delusional comments of space travel and how your have been mistreated all your life being handcuffed and escorted off the property for your obvious superior intellect?       No one here owes you anything.

[joabel1971]

On discussion groups - you only owe people civil, related responses, or you get reported for acting hostile.   
So, that's what you get.    So, continue all you wish.

You actually wasted the admin's time for my calling out your delusional comments of space travel and how your have been mistreated all your life being handcuffed and escorted off the property for your obvious superior intellect?       No one here owes you anything.

That's a typical response from an AI chat bot.   Right, Eliza?   

[joabel1971]

Go ahead, continue if you wish. 

[joabel1971]

Go ahead, continue if you wish. 

[shakalnokturn]

https://www.mmbirdtoys.com/products/2084-rainbow-wingnuts

[joabel1971]

https://www.mmbirdtoys.com/products/2084-rainbow-wingnuts

Ah, I was wondering when some of the offspring AI would show up.   

[EEVblog]

On discussion groups - you only owe people civil, related responses, or you get reported for acting hostile.   
So, that's what you get.    So, continue all you wish.

As per our private conversation, you are one step away from being banned.
You have no right to demand that Joe spend his time updating his software to suit you.

[Gyro]

On discussion groups - you only owe people civil, related responses, or you get reported for acting hostile.   
So, that's what you get.    So, continue all you wish.

You actually wasted the admin's time for my calling out your delusional comments of space travel and how your have been mistreated all your life being handcuffed and escorted off the property for your obvious superior intellect?       No one here owes you anything.

That's a typical response from an AI chat bot.   Right, Eliza?

An AI chat bot who has been an active and valued member of the forum since 2015. His development was clearly ahead of it's time. 

[joabel1971]

An AI chat bot who has been an active and valued member of the forum since 2015. His development was clearly ahead of it's time. 
[/quote]

That's nice.   However, I have no reason to trust his software at this point.   I'll stick to the classic NanoVNA-App. 
For my purposes - it's more effective software than Joe's over-bloated, untested "mystery-ware". 

I mean, who is this guy really - other than what I've experienced as a defamator & a liar?   

[joeqsmith]

However, I have no reason to trust his software at this point.   I'll stick to the classic NanoVNA-App.
For my purposes - it's more effective software than Joe's over-bloated, untested "mystery-ware".

That is the most intelligent post you have made yet!!! 

Rather than Tesla's patent 512,340,  you really should be basing your coil designs off this:
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20090040122A1/en

 

[joabel1971]

However, I have no reason to trust his software at this point.   I'll stick to the classic NanoVNA-App.
For my purposes - it's more effective software than Joe's over-bloated, untested "mystery-ware".

That is the most intelligent post you have made yet!!! 

Rather than Tesla's patent 512,340,  you really should be basing your coil designs off this:
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20090040122A1/en

 

I have no use for the opinion of a defamator and a liar.   You are welcome - to not reply to any of my posts. 

[EEVblog]

I mean, who is this guy really

As I told you, a very well respected member of the community, and with hundreds of videos on Youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/@joesmith-je3tq/videos

[hem213]

That's nice.   However, I have no reason to trust his software at this point.   I'll stick to the classic NanoVNA-App. 
For my purposes - it's more effective software than Joe's over-bloated, untested "mystery-ware". 

I mean, who is this guy really - other than what I've experienced as a defamator & a liar?

Can you just stop, no one is enjoying your tantrum

[joeqsmith]

Solver64 5.04 is now live.  This version adds support for my EPR spectrometer.  I'm sure that is not useful, but it also enables the magnification feature for the Smith chart in the main menu.   Two additional gains were added.   This feature was added in an  attempt to repeat member pdenisowski cable impedance measurements.  Because the Smith chart is an overlay,  the scaling is still fixed.  It does however make moving the cursors easier if you are trying to zoom into the noise like I was.   

https://www.eevblog.com/forum/rf-microwave/vna-for-cable-characterization/msg5565895/#msg5565895

... well respected member of the community  ...

That's a bit thick don't you think?!       I'm just glad you provide us a place to share our common interests.   

[joabel1971]

That's nice.   However, I have no reason to trust his software at this point.   I'll stick to the classic NanoVNA-App. 
For my purposes - it's more effective software than Joe's over-bloated, untested "mystery-ware". 

I mean, who is this guy really - other than what I've experienced as a defamator & a liar?

Can you just stop, no one is enjoying your tantrum

I'm simply responding in turn - to the way I was responded to here.   
So, if you are going to act like I hypocrite, then there's nothing I can do to satisfy you anyway.
You've help create that trap.     

However, without guilt - I can now continue forward, since I've been given very civil & useful responses - from members of different forums.   
This easily verifies that the EEVBlog members could have responded similarly - but instead - chose to act hostile.

Hypocritical responders are a distraction.  You are welcome - to not respond to my posts. 
   

[joeqsmith]

I can now continue forward, ...

I doubt that.    

[joabel1971]

I can now continue forward, ...

I doubt that.   

You've already been reminded that your lack of responses are more welcome - than your responses.
 

[tatel]

You've already been reminded that your lack of posts are more welcome - than your posts

It's a shame that a so long -and quite useful thread- can be so affected by just a guy suffering from some mental disorder, it isn't?

[joeqsmith]

It's a shame that a so long -and quite useful thread- can be so affected by just a guy suffering from some mental disorder, it isn't?

It's really up to the mods and Dave on how or if they want to address it.   

The site is what we make of it.  If people want to discuss free energy plasma warp drives in a VNA thread, so be it.   In this case we have someone who seems to have had a long history of mental issues.  It doesn't take long to see why their backstory involves college security and handcuffs.  Of course they blamed the faculty.  They have always been the victim.  I'm sure they will blame Dave, me, others here as well. 

[joabel1971]

It's a shame that a so long -and quite useful thread- can be so affected by just a guy suffering from some mental disorder, it isn't?

It's really up to the mods and Dave on how or if they want to address it.   

The site is what we make of it.  If people want to discuss free energy plasma warp drives in a VNA thread, so be it.   In this case we have someone who seems to have had a long history of mental issues.  It doesn't take long to see why their backstory involves college security and handcuffs.  Of course they blamed the faculty.  They have always been the victim.  I'm sure they will blame Dave, me, others here as well.

https://appliedphysics.org/warp-grants/
Grant money talks - but Joe's slander doesn't cost him anything.
 

[mawyatt]

https://appliedphysics.org/warp-grants/
Grant money talks - but Joe's slander doesn't cost him anything.
 

Why are you here?

Apply for the grant, and try DARPA as well!!

Best,

[joabel1971]

https://appliedphysics.org/warp-grants/
Grant money talks - but Joe's slander doesn't cost him anything.
 

Why are you here?

Apply for the grant, and try DARPA as well!!

Best,

 I'm trying to analyze patent#512,340 for an interleaved coil.   I think the question becomes - why are you here - besides slandering things you don't appear to understand?   

[mawyatt]

 I'm trying to analyze patent#512,340 for an interleaved coil.   I think the question becomes - why are you here - besides slandering things you don't appear to understand?

There was no slander, simply asking why are you here

Go after those grants, you are obviously well positioned to acquire such!!

BTW we're here because we know what we are doing (backed up by 32 granted US Patents) and appreciate the quality of some folks that are also here

So again, why are you here

Best,

[joabel1971]

 I'm trying to analyze patent#512,340 for an interleaved coil.   I think the question becomes - why are you here - besides slandering things you don't appear to understand?

There was no slander, simply asking why are you here

Go after those grants, you are obviously well positioned to acquire such!!

BTW we're here because we know what we are doing (backed up by 32 granted US Patents) and appreciate the quality of some folks that are also here

So again, why are you here
Best,

Answer already given.  I'm trying to analyze patent 512,340.   If you "know what you are doing", then you would have given your educated answers to how that can be done.   But, you weren't even willing to look through patent - so never mind.   
 

[mawyatt]

We have read the patent and at first glance don't buy the discussion & claims.

First off, the incremental inductance is proportional to conductor length, and then the outer turns contribute more inductance than the inner turns. The coil supports the applied voltage (assumed AC here), thus the outer turns with have a larger voltage drop than the inner turns with the sum equal to the applied voltage. This will cause the voltage difference between turns to be non-uniform and larger on the outer turns and smaller on the inner turns, this alone seems to violate the patent discussion starting at ~85.

Secondly, hopefully the coil isn't an "Over Unity Device", so storing more than "250,000" times as much energy would imply that a simple 1H coil with applied 100VAC, assuming 60Hz, would conduct 265ma and store 0.035 Joules, so this "specially wound" coil would store 250,000 times as much energy as a conventional coil, or 8,795 Joules!!!

We must remember that inductive coil energy is E = (L*I^2)/2, and this implies a coil inductance of 250,000 times increase, or 250,000H that's just not going to happen!!!

Applying EM analysis to the coil described in patent 512,340 and one should find some interesting characteristics, one of which it doesn't store 250,000 times as much energy as a conventional coil!! For simplicity think of the incremental inductance per coil turn and calculate the incremental stored energy per turn, as the sum total should be equal to (Leff I^2)/2 where Leff is the total incremental inductances summed over the whole coil.

Also from First off above, the incremental inductance concept is utilized in special wide-band RF coils commonly used a chokes where the coil is wound in a cone shaped spiral. This unique shape gives a much wider inductance range over frequency than a simple solenoid or flat spiral type coil. A little EM analysis will show such.

You could easily construct a small coil for physical measurements. Please be careful as if we are wrong one could easily kill themselves!!

Good luck on your intellectual endeavors!!

Best,