Author Topic: Stainless steel as an absorber of EMI  (Read 2360 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline bitter_mike

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 36
  • Country: us
  • Expert in electroplating, pretender at electronics
Re: Stainless steel as an absorber of EMI
« Reply #25 on: June 07, 2020, 03:37:11 pm »
One material you may wish to consider is permalloy. It's an 80/20 nickel/iron alloy with extremely high magnetic permeability. In that respect, it is a couple orders of magnitude better than steel (though admittedly, more expensive and more difficult to machine). It's frequently used for low-frequency near field shielding, around motors for instance.
 

Offline Doctorandus_P

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3359
  • Country: nl
Re: Stainless steel as an absorber of EMI
« Reply #26 on: June 07, 2020, 07:31:04 pm »
Stainless steel seems t be a very bad choice for shielding.
* A lot of stainless steel alloy's are non-magnetic.
* Stainless Steel has relative high electric resistance.
* It's difficult to solder.
* The stuff is expensive.

You also have to consider what you want to shield against.
Lots of shielding, even against magnetic fields is done with copper, because it is a good electrical conductor. Take for example the copper wrap over audio power transformers. A changing magnetic field in copper induces eddy currents. You can see some very descriptive video's on youtube with a Neodibbibibbimium magnet in a copper pipe.

Heavy shielding in stuff like Spectrum Analyzers is usually done with thick aluminimum (cheaper than copper, but less conductive).

pre-tinned steel sheet is also common for stuff like scope front-ends and HF pre-amplifiers and stuff like the cans in TV's.
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf