I'm sure you can make a table, I guess microwave is just less studied at this point to be able to do so.
Page 4 of this document has one for lower frequencies.
http://www.ti.com/lit/an/snoa665c/snoa665c.pdfIt looks like we would need to break up the various oscillator technologies mentioned by bigboss by bandwidth..
by the way, bigboss, you can still make generalizations and spreads that "gunn diode signal generators in the ___ band will typically have parameters between ___ ___ _ _"
having this sort of information available makes a design easier to approach.
All elements you add to a signal chain lessen its stability. Each of those things can drift. You are typically getting amplitude and phase drift by adding filters.
For instance, if you take a 0.2ppm drift per kelvin DAC and put a filter in front of it, it turns into a 90ppm capacitor drift (foil capacitor) per kelvin .. or a 20ppm for a ceramic.
And you have a more complicated filter, you get more drift.
Aim small miss small.
Phase noise is only important if you are interested in it
I guess its imporant for some reason or another for conventional use of microwaves but that does not mean we should not have the ability to choose an option that balances amplitude. phase and frequency drift, + harmonics generation.
I am not necessarily interested in the conventional uses, this is of academic interest.''
BAND HF VHF UHF L S C X Ku K Ka V W mm
Hartley,
Colpitts,
Clapp,
Clapp-Gouriet,
Negative Resistance,
Traveling Wave,
Magnetron,
Klystron,
YIG Based,
Di-Electric Based
,Coaxial Resonator Based
This is even difficult at audio frequencies.
perhaps slowly with crowd sourcing and people with experience we can slowly fill this list in. I guess I am just not interested in phase noise. Having this information available may lead to insights. We should not ignore a parameter because filters are possible/practical. This implies our thoughts are lead by economics and industry rather then science.