Author Topic: Wave interference - If I shine 2 lasers on a spot,will there be actual blinking?  (Read 6700 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline daqqTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2302
  • Country: sk
    • My site
Hi guys,

Assuming I have 2 lasers, their spectral peaks some small frequency (say, 2Hz?) apart from one another, and I shine these two lasers onto the same area. Would there be actual visible blinking on the area?

Thanks,

David
Believe it or not, pointy haired people do exist!
+++Divide By Cucumber Error. Please Reinstall Universe And Reboot +++
 

Offline nfmax

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1562
  • Country: gb
Yes. Though good luck finding visible-light lasers only 2Hz apart from each other (at least for a time period of more than a few milliseconds)

[EDIT] I forgot to say that you will only see blinking if the two lasers share the same polarization (or have at least some part of their output identically polarised)
« Last Edit: January 20, 2016, 10:57:28 am by nfmax »
 

Offline m98

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 615
  • Country: de
 

Offline krivx

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 765
  • Country: ie
Yes. Though good luck finding visible-light lasers only 2Hz apart from each other (at least for a time period of more than a few milliseconds)

[EDIT] I forgot to say that you will only see blinking if the two lasers share the same polarization (or have at least some part of their output identically polarised)

Also requires that the laser spots have little spatial variation as well temporal.

To put it in context, a 2Hz variation is about 1 part per 10^14
 

Offline tesla500

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 149
I recently did a teardown of an HP laser head that did something similar to this. A special laser tube produces two wavelengths simultaneously, separated by about 2MHz. The "blinking" is easily picked up with a photo diode. This is used for an interferometer for measuring distances, and can detect movements in the nanometer range.

 

Offline awallin

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 694

This would be fairly easy to do in an optics lab: take a HeNe laser, split it in two with a 50/50 splitter, use two AOM:s at say 50 Mhz and 50 MHz+2 Hz to shift the frequencies of the beams, and combine again with a 50/50 splitter.
 

Offline sarepairman2

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 480
  • Country: 00
yes, this is how they generate low power high frequency signals at times (like terahertz i believe)
 

Offline daqqTopic starter

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2302
  • Country: sk
    • My site
Thanks guys!

Tesla500: Nice device and video, I'll look at it.
Believe it or not, pointy haired people do exist!
+++Divide By Cucumber Error. Please Reinstall Universe And Reboot +++
 

Offline coppice

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 8688
  • Country: gb

This would be fairly easy to do in an optics lab: take a HeNe laser, split it in two with a 50/50 splitter, use two AOM:s at say 50 Mhz and 50 MHz+2 Hz to shift the frequencies of the beams, and combine again with a 50/50 splitter.
A simpler test with most HeNe lasers it to shine them onto a photosensor attached to a spectrum analyser. They generally aren't true monochromatic sources, and output fairly strong spectral lines at n, n+1, n+2 etc wavelengths in the cavity. These are typically frequencies a few hundred MHz apart, and you will see that spacing as lines in the spectrum coming out of the photoreceptor.
 

Offline helius

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3644
  • Country: us
No, because two separate lasers are not coherent with each other. The way to build a Michelson-Morley interferometer is to split a single laser beam along two paths and then converge them together.
 

Offline CatalinaWOW

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5249
  • Country: us
It all boils down to the details.  Not only would the two lasers have to be 2 Hz away, but the line widths would have to be much less than 2 Hz.  Lasers aren't actually monochromatic, just very narrow band.  I haven't run the numbers, but you would have to operate said lasers very cold to get thermal noise that low, and thermal is just one of the sources.  Think of things like doppler on the end mirrors from vibration and piezo effects.  That one part in ten to the 14th is tough.  It may be possible theoretically (not even sure of that), but in practice it just can't be done.
 

Offline awallin

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 694
It all boils down to the details.  Not only would the two lasers have to be 2 Hz away, but the line widths would have to be much less than 2 Hz.  Lasers aren't actually monochromatic, just very narrow band.  I haven't run the numbers, but you would have to operate said lasers very cold to get thermal noise that low, and thermal is just one of the sources.  Think of things like doppler on the end mirrors from vibration and piezo effects.  That one part in ten to the 14th is tough.  It may be possible theoretically (not even sure of that), but in practice it just can't be done.

<=1 Hz linewidth lasers are built quite routinely now in many many groups around the world working on optical clocks or other precision experiments. Most of these lasers are stabilized to a Fabry-Perot cavity made from a low thermal expansion material (Zerodur, ULE glass, single crystal silicon). The cavity is put in a vacuum chamber with thermal shields and good thermal control. Thermal time-constant of days or weeks. Choose a material with parabolic thermal expansion and operate it where the slope is zero. When all other technical noise sources are suppressed what remains is thermal noise, mostly from the multilayer mirror coatings. The latest development is crystalline mirrors (instead of conventional multilayer dielectric mirrors) which have low thermal noise.

Here is a fun video, from the Hänsch (2005 Nobel prize) lab AFAIK:

 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf