Author Topic: Insurance (Group) Card - now requires activation?  (Read 232 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 50ShadesOfDirt

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 64
  • Country: us
Insurance (Group) Card - now requires activation?
« on: October 07, 2022, 01:49:01 pm »
Our employer recently switched insurance companies, so everyone in the family got new insurance cards from CIGNA, printed with our name & group & other info. The card came with an *activation required* peel-off sticker on it?!?!?

My wife and one child "activated" theirs before I heard about it, and put a stop to it. There is no activation required (it's not a smart card or credit card of any kind, just a printed information card). When I took a look at the website and info-gathering process for "activation", it was merely a scam to social engineer the unwary into giving up lots of personal info to the insurance company. Nothing to really activate at all.

So many folks are used to activating their new credit/debit card that such an "activation required" label on *anything* will trick a bunch into giving up their details.

Good grief ...

Watch out for this one ...
 

Offline jpanhalt

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2449
  • Country: us
Re: Insurance (Group) Card - now requires activation?
« Reply #1 on: October 07, 2022, 02:32:17 pm »
I can understand a request to call and acknowledge receipt, but nothing more. 

I am on Medicare because of age, not willingly.  Last year, I changed carriers to one domiciled in Ohio.  Immediately, I started getting calls to complete an extensive health questionnaire and robo calls.  That new carrier apparently had a lot of "business associates."  Most Americans don't realize that the HIPPA act (a law that basically codifies health information privacy) covers doctors, hospitals, and others but largely exempts insurance companies for "legitimate business reasons."  In reality, healthcare providers were asleep and insurance companies had powerful lobbyists working while it was debated in Congress.  Initially, the impact on medical care was significant.  As an example, a hospital-based physician such as a pathologist or radiologist might need to get a patient's consent to review the medical record in order to do work sent to them for a diagnosis.  Distinctly different was sharing information by insurance companies.  That early situation has been dealt with reasonably well by modifying patient consent forms.  Patients may still get what seem like needless requests to release information by some providers.

On the subject of providing individual health information to "help us improve our services,"  for Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries, I don't believe you are required to do that.  In the personal instance mentioned, I have provided nothing.  The carrier and its contractors have continued to send/call me for follow ups, but nothing adverse has happened.

For private insurance, if the premiums are risk-adjusted, you may be required to provide that information. 

For employer-provided insurance, I believe you are not required to answer a health questionnaire, but I am not sure.*  It may depend on the size of the employer and/or whether employees are unionized.  I agree with what you did.  If CIGNA persists, you might need to get more current advice.

*EDIT: During my employed years, I never had to provide that information.  But then, my "insurance" was provided by my employer who was also my healthcare provider.
« Last Edit: October 07, 2022, 02:39:22 pm by jpanhalt »
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf

 



Advertise on the EEVblog Forum