Sounds good news to me. If one is relying on "secureboot" to keep one "secure", then one's OS has already been hacked in practice and a hacker can access any files and modify any system settings as if they were the system's highest level of administrator. Secureboot is a line of "defence" which is behind all the things you want to protect, the only thing it is about securing is M$'s monopoly against competitor operating systems. I'd be much happier with a PC that doesn't secure boot by default (because this so-called screw-up was just a default setting not even a total inability to do it) or doesn't have secureboot at all, than with one which has a locked secureboot (which M$ seems to be working towards with the Pluton SoC concept) forcing users in to the Windows stockade.