Author Topic: 50 ohm inputs for Siglent SDS1104X-E  (Read 5441 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline backyard_cncTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 5
  • Country: ca
50 ohm inputs for Siglent SDS1104X-E
« on: December 31, 2023, 12:25:47 am »
My new Siglent SDS1104X-E lacked the 50ohm inputs that are required for most of the work I do in RF communications so I ordered up a pair of adapters from Amazon when I ordered the scope. They showed up today and a quick test with my tinySA ultra as a 10mhz signal generator shows that the -18dbm signal with its calculated conversion of 79.6mv p-p measures as 80mv which is significantly closer than the measurement without the impedance matching especially when the output of the tinySA is not necessarily precision calibrated!
« Last Edit: December 31, 2023, 01:02:54 am by backyard_cnc »
 

Offline David Hess

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 17427
  • Country: us
  • DavidH
Re: 50 ohm inputs for Siglent SDS1104X-E
« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2023, 02:47:28 am »
The adapters just have a 50 ohm resistor in parallel with the oscilloscope input, which still has its associated input capacitance of about 15 picofarads.  They are useful to 200 or 300 MHz.
 

Offline rf-loop

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4135
  • Country: cn
  • Born in Finland with DLL21 in hand
Re: 50 ohm inputs for Siglent SDS1104X-E
« Reply #2 on: December 31, 2023, 08:55:36 am »



All we who have old times calibrated and repaired Tektronix analog oscilloscopes are familiar with "Input Normalizer" (and there was many of them due to different inputs.  Yes purpose was different but principle same.   

This principle can use also for external 50 ohm termination (Disadvantage is attenuation..)  as well explained in this tube..  ;)
« Last Edit: December 31, 2023, 09:01:35 am by rf-loop »
EV of course. Cars with smoke exhaust pipes - go to museum.
Wises must compel the mad barbarians to stop their crimes against humanity. Where have the (strong)wises gone?
 
The following users thanked this post: Performa01, Antonio90

Online skander36

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 897
  • Country: ro
Re: 50 ohm inputs for Siglent SDS1104X-E
« Reply #3 on: December 31, 2023, 09:04:16 am »
On a Micsig scope (TO 3004) I have obtained even a slightly a better rise time with this load resistor(P57) than with it's internal 50 ohm path.
The result was 1,060 ns for internal 50 ohm and 0,993 ns with P57. With another source the result was  1.606 ns external 50 ohm(P57) and 1,879 ns for internal 50 ohm.
 

Online Aldo22

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1268
  • Country: ch
Re: 50 ohm inputs for Siglent SDS1104X-E
« Reply #4 on: December 31, 2023, 10:29:58 am »
I also bought one of these, but I think these are quite expensive for what they are.
So I made one myself for the second channel using two SMA connectors and two SMD 100Ω resistors as well as some copper shielding.
I can't measure any difference to the commercial product. Is there one?
« Last Edit: December 31, 2023, 11:13:34 am by Aldo22 »
 

Offline tautech

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 29810
  • Country: nz
  • Taupaki Technologies Ltd. Siglent Distributor NZ.
    • Taupaki Technologies Ltd.
Re: 50 ohm inputs for Siglent SDS1104X-E
« Reply #5 on: December 31, 2023, 12:03:06 pm »
LOL
You need a VNA, then you would see !
Avid Rabid Hobbyist.
Some stuff seen @ Siglent HQ cannot be shared.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Online Aldo22

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1268
  • Country: ch
Re: 50 ohm inputs for Siglent SDS1104X-E
« Reply #6 on: December 31, 2023, 12:30:59 pm »
LOL
You need a VNA, then you would see !
Sure! I meant theoretically, something I hadn't considered?
Those Cleqee p57s don't look like rocket science to me.  ;)
I mean, that's two resistors, nothing else substantial.
« Last Edit: December 31, 2023, 12:35:02 pm by Aldo22 »
 

Offline xrunner

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7836
  • Country: us
  • hp>Agilent>Keysight>???
Re: 50 ohm inputs for Siglent SDS1104X-E
« Reply #7 on: December 31, 2023, 01:05:41 pm »
My new Siglent SDS1104X-E lacked the 50ohm inputs that are required for most of the work I do in RF communications so I ordered up a pair of adapters from Amazon when I ordered the scope. They showed up today and a quick test with my tinySA ultra as a 10mhz signal generator shows that the -18dbm signal with its calculated conversion of 79.6mv p-p measures as 80mv which is significantly closer than the measurement without the impedance matching especially when the output of the tinySA is not necessarily precision calibrated!

Amazon Review of product P57 -

Quote
3.0 out of 5 stars Does not meet advertised specifications

Reviewed in the United States on December 24, 2023

Verified Purchase

When this device is swept from DC-1GHz the return loss is really quite terrible when UHF is approached and the device is actually unusable above 800 MHz, and even that is a generous compromise. I wouldn't use them above about 500 MHz and only at very low voltages. Not worth it.

These might be okay for very low voltage low frequency termination, but that's about it. Check out B07G566JC7 for a budget solution that actually works properly.

I intend to return this product. They are really not good even at this price and do not come close to meeting the advertised specification.

https://www.amazon.com/Zyyini-Adapter-Through-Terminator-Device/dp/B07SD3TC51/ref=sr_1_2?crid=X32P7JBA4PNO&keywords=p57+load&qid=1704025061&sprefix=p57+load%2Caps%2C103&sr=8-2
I told my friends I could teach them to be funny, but they all just laughed at me.
 

Offline tautech

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 29810
  • Country: nz
  • Taupaki Technologies Ltd. Siglent Distributor NZ.
    • Taupaki Technologies Ltd.
Re: 50 ohm inputs for Siglent SDS1104X-E
« Reply #8 on: December 31, 2023, 01:06:49 pm »
LOL
You need a VNA, then you would see !
Sure! I meant theoretically, something I hadn't considered?
Those Cleqee p57s don't look like rocket science to me.  ;)
I mean, that's two resistors, nothing else substantial.
Only a balanced transmission line.  ;)
Avid Rabid Hobbyist.
Some stuff seen @ Siglent HQ cannot be shared.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto, Aldo22

Offline Roger Need

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 75
  • Country: ca
Re: 50 ohm inputs for Siglent SDS1104X-E
« Reply #9 on: December 31, 2023, 06:07:41 pm »
I bought several of these P57 adapters to use with my Siglent 1202X-E.

They work fine for me up to 400 MHz with this scope.

Here are some tests I did on two of them with a NanoVNA.  Return loss looks good to me and the traces from the two overlap well so there is not a significant difference between the two units.

Roger

 
The following users thanked this post: DaneLaw, backyard_cnc


Offline the_cake_is_a_lie

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 32
  • Country: us
Re: 50 ohm inputs for Siglent SDS1104X-E
« Reply #11 on: December 31, 2023, 11:36:46 pm »
Is there any advantage of using those adapters over a BNC T adapter with one end fitted with a 50 ohm terminator? That's what I have and the combination is slightly cheaper. Maybe the adapters are more convenient and that's enough justification.
 

Offline CharlotteSwiss

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 810
  • Country: ch
Re: 50 ohm inputs for Siglent SDS1104X-E
« Reply #12 on: January 01, 2024, 12:51:03 am »
I bought several of these P57 adapters to use with my Siglent 1202X-E.

They work fine for me up to 400 MHz with this scope.

Here are some tests I did on two of them with a NanoVNA.  Return loss looks good to me and the traces from the two overlap well so there is not a significant difference between the two units.

Roger

My 1202 is 200Mhz, but I see there are 1202 that go up to 400Mhz?  ::)
 

Offline tautech

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 29810
  • Country: nz
  • Taupaki Technologies Ltd. Siglent Distributor NZ.
    • Taupaki Technologies Ltd.
Re: 50 ohm inputs for Siglent SDS1104X-E
« Reply #13 on: January 01, 2024, 12:56:15 am »
Charlotte, while a 200 MHz DSO might display a 400 MHz signal the amplitude will be very reduced so measurements of such will never be representative.
Avid Rabid Hobbyist.
Some stuff seen @ Siglent HQ cannot be shared.
 

Offline CharlotteSwiss

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 810
  • Country: ch
Re: 50 ohm inputs for Siglent SDS1104X-E
« Reply #14 on: January 01, 2024, 01:03:21 am »
Charlotte, while a 200 MHz DSO might display a 400 MHz signal the amplitude will be very reduced so measurements of such will never be representative.

I thought not even an over frequency signal would detect it. Ok thanks for the information  ;)
 

Offline Veteran68

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 727
  • Country: us
Re: 50 ohm inputs for Siglent SDS1104X-E
« Reply #15 on: January 01, 2024, 03:41:21 am »
Is there any advantage of using those adapters over a BNC T adapter with one end fitted with a 50 ohm terminator? That's what I have and the combination is slightly cheaper. Maybe the adapters are more convenient and that's enough justification.

It's not the same, but depending on what you're measuring, it may or may not make a critical difference. If you're not into sophisticated high frequency RF, the T-adapter terminator is probably good enough.

Here's a link to a recent video of Joe's where he's comparing different through terminators and mentions the drawbacks of the T-adapter termination. Relevant content is at 3:55 into the video.

https://youtu.be/gy10caH95Qg?si=o80vL_-NN5GuyMo-&t=235
 
The following users thanked this post: the_cake_is_a_lie

Offline Njk

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 348
  • Country: ru
Re: 50 ohm inputs for Siglent SDS1104X-E
« Reply #16 on: January 01, 2024, 09:31:26 pm »
I bought several of these P57 adapters to use with my Siglent 1202X-E.
I've three. To be known, a maintenance on arrival was needed for all of them, to make them actually usable. The round cup was hard to rotate but easy to get it stuck. A considerable force was necessary to overcome the friction, causing excessive wear to the metal parts. This is not how a good BNC connector supposed to work. A tiny drop of gear oil in proper place solved the problem. Perhaps the boxes of more expensive brands are lubricated at the factory while in this case it's left to users. Not a big deal though
 

Offline the_cake_is_a_lie

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 32
  • Country: us
Re: 50 ohm inputs for Siglent SDS1104X-E
« Reply #17 on: January 02, 2024, 12:50:48 am »
Cool thanks. My interpretation is under 50 MHz that I'm interested in, it doesn't matter. At some high enough frequency, the termination method makes a difference and being hardcore and wanting PFC on a probe or scope's parasitic capacitance, maybe you got to DIY. If we say 1 GHz has a 30cm wavelength, a 3cm or so extension on the T splitter is enough to generate reflections and we might wonder how close to 50 ohms the resistor really is.
 

Offline joeqsmith

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 12277
  • Country: us
Re: 50 ohm inputs for Siglent SDS1104X-E
« Reply #18 on: January 02, 2024, 03:44:29 am »
Cool thanks. My interpretation is under 50 MHz that I'm interested in, it doesn't matter. At some high enough frequency, the termination method makes a difference and being hardcore and wanting PFC on a probe or scope's parasitic capacitance, maybe you got to DIY. If we say 1 GHz has a 30cm wavelength, a 3cm or so extension on the T splitter is enough to generate reflections and we might wonder how close to 50 ohms the resistor really is.

I would say that's basically going to be true. 

Personally for high speed designs, I most likely am using specialized probes and scopes.   The thru terminations mentioned would never come into play. 

While I never came right out and stated it, that video with the SPICE simulations was more just to show why the original Pasternak thru terminator that used axial resistors out performed my original ones made with surface mount parts, once we considered the effects of the scopes loading.   I assumed most picked up on that when I was presenting the data.   Maybe not..

Offline alm

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2903
  • Country: 00
Re: 50 ohm inputs for Siglent SDS1104X-E
« Reply #19 on: January 02, 2024, 08:51:10 am »
Cool thanks. My interpretation is under 50 MHz that I'm interested in, it doesn't matter.
Just be careful that this is 50 MHz bandwidth, not a 50 MHz repetition rate. If you are looking at the rising edge of a fast 50 MHz square wave, that may well require much more bandwidth than 50 MHz and hence be much more sensitive to termination.

Offline joeqsmith

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 12277
  • Country: us
Re: 50 ohm inputs for Siglent SDS1104X-E
« Reply #20 on: January 02, 2024, 02:12:21 pm »
Just be careful ...

True.

I suspect Rodger's 30dB @ 700MHz return loss was without the terminators attached to their scope.  This is what graybeard had suggested I measure way back when.   Just took me a few years to get around to it.  The video I made walked through the basic math and simulation to show why this is and how it could potentially be improved. 
 
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/50-ohm-inputs-for-siglent-sds1104x-e/msg5252313/#msg5252313

Offline MathWizard

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1772
  • Country: ca
Re: 50 ohm inputs for Siglent SDS1104X-E
« Reply #21 on: January 02, 2024, 11:24:32 pm »
So SMD resistors don't have much parasitic capacitance, but is it mainly that, which screws up the P57 response past 800MHz or less ?
 

Offline David Hess

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 17427
  • Country: us
  • DavidH
Re: 50 ohm inputs for Siglent SDS1104X-E
« Reply #22 on: January 03, 2024, 12:12:16 am »
On a Micsig scope (TO 3004) I have obtained even a slightly a better rise time with this load resistor(P57) than with it's internal 50 ohm path.
The result was 1,060 ns for internal 50 ohm and 0,993 ns with P57. With another source the result was  1.606 ns external 50 ohm(P57) and 1,879 ns for internal 50 ohm.

I would assume that the difference is caused by peaking because of inductance in the resistor or layout.

Is there any advantage of using those adapters over a BNC T adapter with one end fitted with a 50 ohm terminator? That's what I have and the combination is slightly cheaper. Maybe the adapters are more convenient and that's enough justification.

There will be a difference at higher frequencies, but likely no difference at 50 or 100 MHz.

I bought several of these P57 adapters to use with my Siglent 1202X-E.
I've three.

I have collected two different types over the years.  I always wanted one of the small Tektronix ones as a standard for performance, but ended up with a pair of the larger 5 watt Tektronix ones which are only good to a lower frequency, and one of the 1 GHz ones like that discussed here.
 
The following users thanked this post: Performa01

Offline joeqsmith

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 12277
  • Country: us
Re: 50 ohm inputs for Siglent SDS1104X-E
« Reply #23 on: January 03, 2024, 05:08:29 am »
So SMD resistors don't have much parasitic capacitance, but is it mainly that, which screws up the P57 response past 800MHz or less ?

If you followed along in that video where I went over some of the basic math and simulate the termination,  I am suggesting it is the scopes input that screws up the response, which I assume is why graybeard asked my to look at it.   

Offline the Chris

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 61
  • Country: de
Re: 50 ohm inputs for Siglent SDS1104X-E
« Reply #24 on: January 03, 2024, 05:57:42 am »
If you followed along in that video where I went over some of the basic math and simulate the termination,  I am suggesting it is the scopes input that screws up the response, which I assume is why graybeard asked my to look at it.

I enjoyed watching the video a lot, great presentation of measurements and their evaluation.

My takeaway was that for best performance, a custom termination is adjusted to the individual scope on which the termination is going to be used. I especially liked the use of an inductance to linearize the response. Felt like adusting a speaker crossover.

Thanks for the recording,
Christian
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf