hello. it's good to be able to the developer directly
. thanks for opening a line
.
considering that 1013d is still being sold and not as a device for children and it really has it's uses(i test power supply and chargers with it like ripple and noise and transient response and rise time...), will you update it's firmware?
when i contacted fnirsi about the missing features or bugs like peak detect mode acquisition mode and low voltage detection(the scope simply ignores about 300mv at 10x or 30mv at 1x), they said a new firmware will come. will you kindly provide better firmware?
There is nothing that the Chinese cannot promise you. Forget it, the 1013D is dead. It would require new firmware for the fpga and a program for the uP, and the bus between the fpga and the uP is narrow.
you are right man. he is completely irresponsible and Fnirsi is no different. he is the same man who made a crap firmware that cripples low voltage amplitude detection in his own designed, 1013d. what a joke this is. he and Fnirsi are a good match for each other when it comes to produce a device and leave it there for others to fix!
look at this sentence from him:"Why haven't I updated it? Because the sales
are too terrible". he is just completely irresponsible.
It is not the crap firmware that is the problem with the low voltage measurements, it is the crap hardware. The same goes for peak detection. It depends a bit on what your ideas are on the peak detection, but if it is needed to be a form of trigger, then it is not possible with the current hardware configuration. As is one can only search through a just made acquisition and look for a peak within the samples, and report this peak to the user. Probably not very useful with only 3000 samples.
As a side remark, sure Atlan deserves respect, but he is building further on my source code and has no or little insight in the original FNIRSI firmware, so your other post is not to accurate on that issue. And I think Atlan is not doing it to please others here on the forum, but more as a hobby and or learning experience, just like I did. That others benefit from it, is just a side effect. For me it was born out of need due to a defective touch panel.
And blaming a manufacturer for not putting time into a product that does not sell well does not stick. It is just good business sense from a money and profit perspective. No lives are on stake with a product like this, so irresponsible, no I don't think so.
Edit: I wrote this while Atlan made his post, so I missed that he already corrected mehdifat.