Products > Test Equipment

A few specific questions for SDS2000X HD owners (or possibly any SDS owners)

<< < (8/15) > >>

Spike:

--- Quote from: kripton2035 on June 08, 2024, 06:55:03 am ---I downloaded the latest nightly build of pulseview for mac, it is from march 2024.
but it does not start there is a missing library. and it is an intel app also.
I tried to build from the sources, but I have a lot of errors, each time I try to correct an error i get another one... :(
I'm ok to try your arm binary, even if it does not connect to the 2000hd for now.

--- End quote ---
PM sent

kripton2035:
for what it's worth, the siglent model for my scope seems to be "SDS2504X HD"




--- Quote --- 201 #define SERIES(x) &supported_series[x]
 202 /* series, model, min timebase, analog channels, digital */
 203 static const struct siglent_sds_model supported_models[] = {
 204         { SERIES(SDS1000CML), "SDS1152CML", { 20, 1000000000 }, 2, FALSE, 0 },
 205         { SERIES(SDS1000CML), "SDS1102CML", { 10, 1000000000 }, 2, FALSE, 0 },
 206         { SERIES(SDS1000CML), "SDS1072CML", { 5, 1000000000 }, 2, FALSE, 0 },
 207         { SERIES(SDS1000CNL), "SDS1202CNL", { 20, 1000000000 }, 2, FALSE, 0 },
 208         { SERIES(SDS1000CNL), "SDS1102CNL", { 10, 1000000000 }, 2, FALSE, 0 },
 209         { SERIES(SDS1000CNL), "SDS1072CNL", { 5, 1000000000 }, 2, FALSE, 0 },
 210         { SERIES(SDS1000DL), "SDS1202DL", { 20, 1000000000 }, 2, FALSE, 0 },
 211         { SERIES(SDS1000DL), "SDS1102DL", { 10, 1000000000 }, 2, FALSE, 0 },
 212         { SERIES(SDS1000DL), "SDS1022DL", { 5, 1000000000 }, 2, FALSE, 0 },
 213         { SERIES(SDS1000DL), "SDS1052DL", { 5, 1000000000 }, 2, FALSE, 0 },
 214         { SERIES(SDS1000DL), "SDS1052DL+", { 5, 1000000000 }, 2, FALSE, 0 },
 215         { SERIES(SDS1000X), "SDS1102X", { 2, 1000000000 }, 2, FALSE, 0 },
 216         { SERIES(SDS1000XP), "SDS1102X+", { 2, 1000000000 }, 2, FALSE, 0 },
 217         { SERIES(SDS1000X), "SDS1202X", { 2, 1000000000 }, 2, FALSE, 0 },
 218         { SERIES(SDS1000XP), "SDS1202X+", { 2, 1000000000 }, 2, FALSE, 0 },
 219         { SERIES(SDS1000XE), "SDS1202X-E", { 1, 1000000000 }, 2, FALSE, 0 },
 220         { SERIES(SDS1000XE), "SDS1104X-E", { 1, 1000000000 }, 4, TRUE, 16 },
 221         { SERIES(SDS1000XE), "SDS1204X-E", { 1, 1000000000 }, 4, TRUE, 16 },
 222         { SERIES(SDS2000X), "SDS2072X", { 2, 1000000000 }, 2, FALSE, 0 },
 223         { SERIES(SDS2000X), "SDS2074X", { 2, 1000000000 }, 4, FALSE, 0 },
 224         { SERIES(SDS2000X), "SDS2102X", { 2, 1000000000 }, 2, FALSE, 0 },
 225         { SERIES(SDS2000X), "SDS2104X", { 2, 1000000000 }, 4, FALSE, 0 },
 226         { SERIES(SDS2000X), "SDS2202X", { 2, 1000000000 }, 2, FALSE, 0 },
 227         { SERIES(SDS2000X), "SDS2204X", { 2, 1000000000 }, 4, FALSE, 0 },
 228         { SERIES(SDS2000X), "SDS2302X", { 2, 1000000000 }, 2, FALSE, 0 },
 229         { SERIES(SDS2000X), "SDS2304X", { 2, 1000000000 }, 4, FALSE, 0 },
 230 };

--- End quote ---

if you add the 2000hd description in the struct above (from libsiglent source) it could be enough ???

Spike:

--- Quote from: kripton2035 on June 08, 2024, 08:08:01 pm ---for what it's worth, the siglent model for my scope seems to be "SDS2504X HD"



if you add the 2000hd description in the struct above (from libsiglent source) it could be enough ???

--- End quote ---
I don’t think so, based on the snippets of code I posted above which are sprinkled throughout the patch.  The HD likely needs the support added for the Plus, and with some of that code guarded with those statements I doubt very much that the HD will work.  The patch needs to be reworked a bit, I think.

KungFuJosh:

--- Quote from: Spike on June 08, 2024, 08:48:31 pm ---The patch needs to be reworked a bit, I think.

--- End quote ---

Can you replace the Plus references with Plus OR HD?

Spike:

--- Quote from: KungFuJosh on June 08, 2024, 09:15:50 pm ---
--- Quote from: Spike on June 08, 2024, 08:48:31 pm ---The patch needs to be reworked a bit, I think.

--- End quote ---

Can you replace the Plus references with Plus OR HD?

--- End quote ---

Certainly.  And anyone is welcome to do that to accommodate their personal need.  I have no way to test that at the moment and I'd prefer to rework the patch to make it more general and easier to maintain going forward.  There's no chance the patch will be accepted as is and that is part of the reason why.  Ultimately it would be nice to have it merged if for no other reason than not having to maintain it outside of sigrok.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod