A recent example: https://www.eevblog.com/forum/projects/expected-quite-some-noise-but-found-nearly-none/msg5783297/#msg5783297
People take time to reply. ok, some didn't read what you wrote. That happens often and I'm not guilt free either. Some have asked you valid questions. But you don't bother to write a descent reply to answer those questions. Instead you post more information from which we can deduce nothing and piss on people who didn't read what you wrote.
Is it rude, to say, that i did not ask you for an example?
People taking time to replay without reading or understanding my post i consider annoying. Escpecially those, that then create a wrong perception about me, and put words in my mouth! Unfortunately this happens too often for my likings, and i dont have that much patience...
What answer exactly needed to be more decent? How would you define decent?
I also have posted questions that were never answered.
It also seems , that people just cant deal with specific questions in general, or questions, that are a response of a question...
Maybe I should have let 2N3055 answer the question first. But somehow I just had a very good stand alone example.
1. You post a question but some relevant information is missing. Ok, people ask you to clarify some bits and pieces about the DIY current sense loop probe (construction, position in your test setup) because the question was all about the DIY current sense probe. This was never answered and as such we have no idea about what you are trying to do.
2. You return to piss on people who didn't read your question properly but fail to add the relevant information and instead add some information which is specific to the oscilloscope being used. (I'm not going to read the manual of your 800 HD. Sorry)
3. More people ask you about the missing information. But still you fail to address the most important question.
4. You post some explanation from which it can deduced that the problem has been solved. But again, the information given is irrelevant as the requested information has never been shared.
I would at least provide the missing information even if the information became irrelevant because the problem has been solved and probably apologize for the misunderstanding because the problem description wasn't very clear.
Someone else wrote i had a bad breadboard setup. BUT i had no breadboard there! Then you say i was not clear enough? Next time someone will tell me to turn my LEDs lights off, when i dont have such?? How stupid is this? 
Are you referring to this post?
I think you have to admit that what you wrote isn't very clear and the picture doesn't show much either. It shows a probe attached to a power resistor and some wires. Where is the DIY field probe? Because that's what you're question is all about.
The bold part is the question asked by a few people and relevant to understand what is going on. If according to you this question is irrelevant, it is up to you to realize that the question you posted isn't clear enough because more people have asked the same question. What might be clear for you might look as clear as mud to others. The nature of a forum is that there is no means to quickly adapt the way you try to explain concepts, ideas,... when the other part has difficulty understanding what you are trying to communicate like you would do in real life when talking to people face to face.