| Products > Test Equipment |
| DS2000A Upgrade Utility |
| << < (8/52) > >> |
| miguelvp:
--- Quote from: Mark_O on April 04, 2014, 01:08:32 am ---Wow, what an enormous amount of pissing and moaning :rant: about a tool someone spent their time on, for free, to try to help people out. Way to say "thanks"! :clap: :-+ [/sarcasm] --- End quote --- Specially when the original source is available and linked on the monster thread. Write your own people and make it open source if you feel so strong about it! :box: And as a bonus you have to look through the sniffing thread to find where the code is at! :-DD |
| Rigby:
--- Quote from: Mark_O on April 04, 2014, 01:08:32 am ---Wow, what an enormous amount of pissing and moaning :rant: about a tool someone spent their time on, for free, to try to help people out. Way to say "thanks"! :clap: :-+ [/sarcasm] --- End quote --- i wasn't informed that thanks were required. is this a new rule of yours? i don't own a DS2000A so I'm not sure why I should be saying thanks. |
| madcrow:
========UPDATE======== ===================== This afternoon, I ditched the "Advanced BAT to EXE Converter" tool along with my current install-helper executables, and recreated them using AutoHotKey. The upside is that AutoHotKey is a much more widely known and used scripting tool, and consequently, compiled AHK scripts are whitelisted by all major AV solutions. I uploaded an all-new installer package (under the old link in the OP), built on the AHK install-scripts, which look an awful lot better in virusTotal: VirusTotal analysis of dotNet451-x86-x64-silent-launcher-w-installation-detector.exe VirusTotal analysis of bonjour-3.0.0.10-x86-x64-silent-w-installation-detector.exe VirusTotal analysis of bonjour-3.0.0.10-x86-x64.exe As you can see, all the "big players" (Symantec, McAfee, Kaspersky, Comodo, Malwarebytes, etc.) report them as safe. @People, who already installed the previous release: It is unnecessary for you to update to this one! The application itself is exactly the same as before (this is why the version number is still 1.0.0.0). In fact, functionally, everything is the same. The only difference is that the installer-scripts are now written in a different language. The only reason I made this adjustment is to make the installer look more trustworthy for newcomers. |
| madcrow:
--- Quote from: miguelvp on April 04, 2014, 01:13:30 am --- --- Quote from: Mark_O on April 04, 2014, 01:08:32 am ---Wow, what an enormous amount of pissing and moaning :rant: about a tool someone spent their time on, for free, to try to help people out. --- End quote --- Specially when the original source is available and linked on the monster thread. Write your own people and make it open source if you feel so strong about it! :box: --- End quote --- Hey Mark_O and miguelvp Thanks for the support. It's really nice to see there are some people out there who actually appreciate my effort :) BTW, have you already tried the Utility? If you are using a Win8.x OS and/or you chose the package with the built-in installer, it would be very useful for me if you could provide some feedback. (E.g.: Did the app complain about missing components after installation? Does it work and look OK under Win8?) |
| madcrow:
Here is the source, binary and changelog of the updated "rigup" tool I am using in the Utility, in case any of the open-source fans are interested. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |