Author Topic: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?  (Read 12311 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rauldmTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 158
  • Country: mx
Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« on: July 27, 2019, 02:04:14 am »
I need a meter with LoZ impedance, I have the 289, but I need another, my options are the Fluke 117 or GreenLee DM-830A. I know the greenlee is a brymen. I have another amprobe and keysigth meters, but the performance is not sorprendent like  the my Flukes. For example my U1282A, the bar graph when I work with Ohms is more slow than my Flukes, the bar graph performance in the u1282a only detects clicks on 40 Hz update mode. My Fluke 87V even on hi-res mode the bar graph is fast. Really brymen meters are fast? the money difference between Fluke 117 and DM-830A is not important, but DM-830A it has a interesting LoZ mode, for example, the LoZ for Fluke is 3 kOhms, for keysight is 2 kOhms up to 600 V for both, the brymen change the input impedance from 3 kOhms to 460 kOhms for 1000 V, sounds good but, is functional? the brymen responce is really more fast to Fluke 117? Regards.
 

Offline MarkF

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2838
  • Country: us
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #1 on: July 27, 2019, 02:33:18 am »
+1 for the Fluke 117.

I have both a Fluke 117 and a Fluke 87V.  As far as the bar graph and other responsiveness, both Flukes are about the same.
Since you have a 87V, you can expect the Fluke 117 to be similar to the 87V as a comparison.
 
The following users thanked this post: rauldm

Offline rauldmTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 158
  • Country: mx
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #2 on: July 27, 2019, 02:51:31 am »
Are you using the LoZ mode in your 117? I had a good experience with this function in my 289. Therefore I need another meter with this function, is essential on electrical installations. You can solve some problems on control area with this feature.  8)
 
The following users thanked this post: Marco1971

Offline MarkF

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2838
  • Country: us
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #3 on: July 27, 2019, 03:32:38 am »
I rarely use the LoZ mode.

However, I did just use it this week repairing a stove. 
The 117 was showing a low AC voltage on normal AC V range with stove unplugged. 
Switching to LoZ, it measured 0 VAC as expected.
 
The following users thanked this post: rauldm

Offline MarkF

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2838
  • Country: us
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #4 on: July 27, 2019, 04:07:02 am »
And, if you want to see inside:

 
The following users thanked this post: rauldm

Offline Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 17732
  • Country: 00
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #5 on: July 27, 2019, 10:05:50 am »
Really brymen meters are fast?

Yes.
 
The following users thanked this post: rauldm

Offline L_Euler

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 86
  • Country: us
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #6 on: July 27, 2019, 11:45:30 am »
Before i got a 289 I built a small adaptor box that was inserted between the probes and meter with a couple switchable resistors. (1000ohm, none, 10000ohm) and appropriate fusing for the resistor sizes.  It worked beautifully and was able to use with any multimeter.  I was checking a lot of PLC solid state outputs in industrial control systems.
« Last Edit: July 29, 2019, 11:17:01 am by L_Euler »
There's no point to getting old if you don't have stories.
 
The following users thanked this post: rauldm

Offline rauldmTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 158
  • Country: mx
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #7 on: July 27, 2019, 09:02:57 pm »
Someone tested Auto-check on Brymen multimeters?
 

Offline Per Hansson

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 448
  • Country: se
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #8 on: July 27, 2019, 09:28:59 pm »
Before i got a 289 I built a small adaptor box that was inserted between the probes and meter with a couple switchable resistors. (100ohm, none, 1000ohm) and appropriate fusing for the resistor sizes.  It worked beautifully and was able to use with any multimeter.  I was checking a lot of PLC solid state outputs in industrial control systems.
Fluke does sell such an adapter, I use it myself and it works fine.
Of course it would be surprising if a resistor in a plastic box did not work well ;)

https://www.fluke.com/en-us/product/accessories/adapters/fluke-sv225
 
The following users thanked this post: 001, rauldm

Offline Electro Detective

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2715
  • Country: au
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #9 on: July 28, 2019, 12:00:09 am »
If you don't need the features and price of the 117, I can vouch the 114 does a good enough job in Low-Z as the 289. 

The 114 is my go to 'idiot' meter, it has no current inputs or fuses to think about
and good enough for quickie troubleshoots

They go cheap used, people sell them off to upgrade to feature filled 117, 87V, Brymen, Keysights, etc
and miss the point of a simple meter with the basics Low-Z, AC, DC, Min Max, Ohms/Buzzer
and according to Mr. Smith's exhaustive tests, a fair 'resistance' to ESD styled  -BANGS!-   :o

 
fwiw I can be 'less careful' with using both the 114 and non Low-Z 101, flanked by two clamp meters,
gloves, glasses, rubber boots, diligence...  :D

and so far they've kept my pocket healthy


FYI for battlers that just want an entry level 'LOW-Z' capable meter that's affordable, and worked well for me before the Flukes rocked up, the Klein CL3200 won't break the bank,
and came with a nice zippered pouch, great leads and croc/alli adapters.

Still have it, doing tool box #3 duty nowadays   :clap:
« Last Edit: July 28, 2019, 12:03:52 am by Electro Detective »
 
The following users thanked this post: rauldm

Offline rauldmTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 158
  • Country: mx
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #10 on: July 28, 2019, 02:53:08 am »
Really this adapter is good option for me, I can put in every meters,  thanks for the answer. I think with the price this adapter and the 117 I would buy the Brymen, but I have more Fluke products and accesorys.
 

Offline rauldmTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 158
  • Country: mx
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #11 on: July 28, 2019, 02:57:27 am »
In my country for some reason, the Fluke 117 is more popular than Fluke 114, I can find for the same price even new. Thanks for your answer.
 

Offline Electro Detective

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2715
  • Country: au
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #12 on: July 28, 2019, 10:53:52 am »

The Fluke Low-Z adapter was expensive for a 3k resistor so I just bought a new Klein CL3200 and a used 114 for the same 'boutique 3K resistor' money   :clap:

DIY adapter was an option too, so was laziness  ;D

Besides, I'd rather have the CAT ratings intact with a purpose built and rated Low-Z meter, rather than have addons

fwiw be careful as Low-Z mode can sometimes bring on BANGS!

and guaranteed RCD/GFCI trips



 

Offline Neomys Sapiens

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3268
  • Country: de
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #13 on: July 29, 2019, 05:00:30 pm »
If you consider buying used, there is also the Metrahit12/14 from GMC (look for a thread named 'show your multimeter', there you can see mine.)
Also, some of the newer GMC multimeters have such a feature.
 

Offline Electro Detective

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2715
  • Country: au
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #14 on: August 02, 2019, 11:03:45 pm »

FWIW: Here's cool brief PDF info sheet from Fluke that sold me to get a Low-Z 'Ghost Buster'  meter :scared:  (or two.. :-[)


Dual impedance digital multimeters— What's the point?

support.fluke.com/find-sales/Download/Asset/2718074_6116_ENG_A_W.PDF

 

Offline SG-1

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 198
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #15 on: August 03, 2019, 12:35:33 am »
Fluke also offers the SV225,but you can buy an off brand meter for the same price. 
Advice is a dangerous gift, even from the wise to the wise.
 
The following users thanked this post: 001

Offline Electro Detective

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2715
  • Country: au
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #16 on: August 06, 2019, 09:30:08 am »

For the money Fluke charge on long running money for jam flagship meters,
the encased boutique 3000 ohm resistor should be chucked in as a freebie  :popcorn:



« Last Edit: August 06, 2019, 10:20:31 am by Electro Detective »
 
The following users thanked this post: 001

Offline 001

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1170
  • Country: aq
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #17 on: August 06, 2019, 10:32:49 am »
Can anybody told me why 3kOhm Fluke addon rated to 1000V? http://assets.fluke.com/manuals/sv225___iseng0000.pdf
It is only resistor, isnt`it? And by Ohm law  it must be heated with 333watts  :-//
 

Online 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7755
  • Country: hr
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #18 on: August 06, 2019, 03:16:19 pm »
Can anybody told me why 3kOhm Fluke addon rated to 1000V? http://assets.fluke.com/manuals/sv225___iseng0000.pdf
It is only resistor, isnt`it? And by Ohm law  it must be heated with 333watts  :-//

It is not a resistor.
It is a PTC, that heats up and increases resistance in few milliseconds... So current drops considerably...
"Just hard work is not enough - it must be applied sensibly."
Dr. Richard W. Hamming
 
The following users thanked this post: 001

Offline 001

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1170
  • Country: aq
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #19 on: August 06, 2019, 05:41:47 pm »
Can anybody told me why 3kOhm Fluke addon rated to 1000V? http://assets.fluke.com/manuals/sv225___iseng0000.pdf
It is only resistor, isnt`it? And by Ohm law  it must be heated with 333watts  :-//

It is not a resistor.
It is a PTC, that heats up and increases resistance in few milliseconds... So current drops considerably...

Thanx a lot!

But why 3kOhm? 3kOhm at what voltage?  :-// How to clone it properly? Is simple 10kOhm resistor will work same way at 0-30V?
 

Offline Neomys Sapiens

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3268
  • Country: de
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #20 on: August 06, 2019, 11:10:05 pm »

The Fluke Low-Z adapter was expensive for a 3k resistor so I just bought a new Klein CL3200 and a used 114 for the same 'boutique 3K resistor' money   :clap:

DIY adapter was an option too, so was laziness  ;D

Besides, I'd rather have the CAT ratings intact with a purpose built and rated Low-Z meter, rather than have addons

fwiw be careful as Low-Z mode can sometimes bring on BANGS!

and guaranteed RCD/GFCI trips
If the Fluke adaptor in question is the 'stray voltage test leads' that came with the original 27 (AN/PSM-45A), it was not a resistor, but a PTC thermistor.
 
The following users thanked this post: Electro Detective, umbro

Offline Electro Detective

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2715
  • Country: au
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #21 on: August 06, 2019, 11:45:33 pm »
Can anybody told me why 3kOhm Fluke addon rated to 1000V? http://assets.fluke.com/manuals/sv225___iseng0000.pdf
It is only resistor, isnt`it? And by Ohm law  it must be heated with 333watts  :-//


It is not a resistor.
It is a PTC, that heats up and increases resistance in few milliseconds... So current drops considerably...


So is that what they also use in the 114 to 117 series and Fluke 289?  :-//

IIRC they show up as 3K when tested with another meter's resistance range (in lazy Auto mode)

Does a PTC register as 3K instantly, or sort of ramps up to that value once the heat is on? ( >:D)

Why not a monster 3K resistor with heatsink and one of those orange current protection thingies, rattling around in a fuglee box with sockets and flying leads

Anyone got one of these boutiquey black box Fluke SV225
and a knack for cracking it open without trashing it?



 

Offline rauldmTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 158
  • Country: mx
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #22 on: August 07, 2019, 01:19:33 am »
Hi, I bought a new Fluke 117,  I tested with AC and DC voltage on LoZ mode, the input impedance change with increment of voltage, for example I tested with 133.8 Vac, neglecting capacitive or inductive effects, I have around 15.7 kOhm, input impedance, with 20 Vdc I have around 3.3 kOhms, is not single resistor. With suggest from Per Hansson, I researched about SV225, on youtube exists a tutorial for repair this unit, and shows a resistor and PTC. Thanks for contributions, I hope buy SV225 too.

 

Offline rauldmTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 158
  • Country: mx
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #23 on: August 07, 2019, 01:37:23 am »
The ghost voltage is common on electrical control  installations, some weeks ago, I was repairing a control system with contactors and power electronics, I was with 289 and 376 fc, high impdeance mode on 289 and 376 fc show voltage,   I remmenber the LoZ mode on 289 and surprise, is not real tension, the meters only show coupled voltage for capacitive efect on the control lines near power lines.
The motive for this post was I would want have at least other meter with this feature, I bought the 117 yesterday, but I want have Lo Z on my others meters. Thanks for SV225  suggest.
 

Offline HKJ

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3164
  • Country: dk
    • Tests
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #24 on: August 07, 2019, 04:55:52 am »
A typical LowZ PTC impedance curve:


This curve is from a Fluke289, but other meters are similar.
 
The following users thanked this post: shakalnokturn

Online 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7755
  • Country: hr
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #25 on: August 07, 2019, 07:03:52 am »
Circuit uses same PTC as for protection, one or few of them , with surge rated resistor in series, to limit initial current and to have current limit in case something goes wrong with PTC .
It starts at 3 kOhm (I presume Fluke one will have 1.1k PTC and 2.2k surge rated resistor in series) when cold (25°C) and then resistance of PTC goes up in megaohm range when heated. So much lower current later.

P.S. Found the mentioned video, Fluke probably uses two 1.1 K PTC  (like the YS4020) and one 1k surge resistant resistor in series.
« Last Edit: August 07, 2019, 07:25:01 am by 2N3055 »
"Just hard work is not enough - it must be applied sensibly."
Dr. Richard W. Hamming
 

Offline HKJ

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3164
  • Country: dk
    • Tests
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #26 on: August 07, 2019, 07:10:59 am »
...then resistance of PTC goes up in megaohm range when heated. So much lower current later.

Not really, as you can see on my curve above. Typically a bit above 1 Watt is needed to keep the PTC heated, this means at around 1000V it might just reach 1Mohm.
 

Online 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7755
  • Country: hr
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #27 on: August 07, 2019, 07:37:59 am »
...then resistance of PTC goes up in megaohm range when heated. So much lower current later.

Not really, as you can see on my curve above. Typically a bit above 1 Watt is needed to keep the PTC heated, this means at around 1000V it might just reach 1Mohm.

That is what I said.  ^-^  It reaches order of magnitude of megaohms when heated.  I wasn't talking about voltage coefficient..
In Fluke adaptor they use two in series, so heating will be divided between the two of them.

How did you measure that curve? Did you sweep the voltage in one go, or did you measure current at voltage points one by one, letting it cool down for few minutes. If you did a sweep, did you wait at discrete points for it to reach thermal equilibrium? It would be interesting to know the method.
Also what would be interesting is to record current with a scope on connect to see how it draws larger current in the beginning, and how that curve is different at different voltages......
"Just hard work is not enough - it must be applied sensibly."
Dr. Richard W. Hamming
 

Offline HKJ

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3164
  • Country: dk
    • Tests
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #28 on: August 07, 2019, 08:42:15 am »

That is what I said.  ^-^  It reaches order of magnitude of megaohms when heated.  I wasn't talking about voltage coefficient..
In Fluke adaptor they use two in series, so heating will be divided between the two of them.

100kOhm at 250V is hardly in the megaohms magnitude.


How did you measure that curve? Did you sweep the voltage in one go, or did you measure current at voltage points one by one, letting it cool down for few minutes. If you did a sweep, did you wait at discrete points for it to reach thermal equilibrium? It would be interesting to know the method.

I sweep the voltage measuring in 1V steps from 10 to 250V, each point takes 1 second, i.e. a total of 4 minutes for the test.

 

Offline Electro Detective

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2715
  • Country: au
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #29 on: August 07, 2019, 10:15:36 am »
youtube.com/watch?v=IOoJmMBE5D8

The not impressed Youtuber paid 80 bucks (US?) for a boutique 3K resistor and PTC (50 cent total?) in a plastic box,
that appears to have been spit soldered with lashings of planned obsolescence and assembled at ThreeHungLow Industries
with perhaps a QC (Questionable Crap) sticker
slapped on by ailing wheelchair bound honorable great great grandad gathering peanuts for the grandkids to go to school and or eat  :clap:

Just how much percentage are the shareholders demanding, or the brokers that stitched up their life savings promising nowadays?  :-//

I don't even want to think how much this toy costs today in Kangaroo Land,
I bought an unloved unused 114 and NEW Klein meter (both with Low-Z) for the same price a while back,
as one of these overpriced Low-Z interfaces, stashed inside a repurposed USB charger housing.

You could chain solder the 3 components, put the lot in a clear zip lunch bag with flying leads,
save a bundle,
inspection and servicing would be a breeze    :-+

;D



« Last Edit: August 07, 2019, 10:32:00 am by Electro Detective »
 
The following users thanked this post: 001

Online 2N3055

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 7755
  • Country: hr
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #30 on: August 07, 2019, 10:38:38 am »

That is what I said.  ^-^  It reaches order of magnitude of megaohms when heated.  I wasn't talking about voltage coefficient..
In Fluke adaptor they use two in series, so heating will be divided between the two of them.

100kOhm at 250V is hardly in the megaohms magnitude.


How did you measure that curve? Did you sweep the voltage in one go, or did you measure current at voltage points one by one, letting it cool down for few minutes. If you did a sweep, did you wait at discrete points for it to reach thermal equilibrium? It would be interesting to know the method.

I sweep the voltage measuring in 1V steps from 10 to 250V, each point takes 1 second, i.e. a total of 4 minutes for the test.
Thank you for details.
FYI looking at the datasheet for a Vishay PTC and it is 1 Meg at 135C and 10 Meg at 150C. It is 100k at cca 130C. Slope is very steep at that point, ambient temp will have large influence together with thermal design.
Regards..
"Just hard work is not enough - it must be applied sensibly."
Dr. Richard W. Hamming
 

Offline 001

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1170
  • Country: aq
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #31 on: August 07, 2019, 12:10:48 pm »
youtube.com/watch?v=IOoJmMBE5D8

Thanx  a lot

Color code at 2:17 says resistor is only 17 Ohm?   (I can be confused with my monitor color and eyes) What real values of two PTCs and resistor are?
« Last Edit: August 07, 2019, 12:13:32 pm by 001 »
 

Offline Shock

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4376
  • Country: au
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #32 on: August 07, 2019, 01:28:03 pm »
Been already discussed in this other thread, I read the value as 1K which makes sense, it looks like brown black red gold red in the video. https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/brymen-bm867-bm869/

Looking inside the Fluke 117 confirms the resistor and PTCs are there.




« Last Edit: August 07, 2019, 02:36:17 pm by Shock »
Soldering/Rework: Pace ADS200, Pace MBT350
Multimeters: Fluke 189, 87V, 117, 112   >>> WANTED STUFF <<<
Oszilloskopen: Lecroy 9314, Phillips PM3065, Tektronix 2215a, 314
 
The following users thanked this post: 001, Electro Detective

Offline Per Hansson

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 448
  • Country: se
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #33 on: August 07, 2019, 07:52:03 pm »
youtube.com/watch?v=IOoJmMBE5D8

The not impressed Youtuber paid 80 bucks (US?) for a boutique 3K resistor and PTC (50 cent total?) in a plastic box,
that appears to have been spit soldered with lashings of planned obsolescence and assembled at ThreeHungLow Industries
with perhaps a QC (Questionable Crap) sticker
slapped on by ailing wheelchair bound honorable great great grandad gathering peanuts for the grandkids to go to school and or eat  :clap:

Just how much percentage are the shareholders demanding, or the brokers that stitched up their life savings promising nowadays?  :-//

I don't even want to think how much this toy costs today in Kangaroo Land,
I bought an unloved unused 114 and NEW Klein meter (both with Low-Z) for the same price a while back,
as one of these overpriced Low-Z interfaces, stashed inside a repurposed USB charger housing.

You could chain solder the 3 components, put the lot in a clear zip lunch bag with flying leads,
save a bundle,
inspection and servicing would be a breeze    :-+

;D
I agree with your post, the price is just silly, for me I use it for work.
But I also just want to highly underline that there is another side to this, safety:
The Adapter is specified for CAT III 1000V/CAT IV 600V per EN61010.

I use my SV225 for a secondary purpose: to discharge capacitors in servos, as can be seen in the curve above it's not the best, but so far it has been useful to me.
Now imagine what would happen with an adapter actually assembled at ThreeHungLow Industries as you say.
Here I will give an idea: https://youtu.be/OEoazQ1zuUM?t=345
Just something to keep in mind when measuring high energy circuits which is the whole idea if you need this adapter in the first place.
I agree that buying a meter with LoZ mode is better, be careful though: I thought my Fluke 28-II had such a mode but it's a low pass filter, not low impedance!
 
The following users thanked this post: 001

Offline 001

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1170
  • Country: aq
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #34 on: August 07, 2019, 07:59:02 pm »
Been already discussed in this other thread, I read the value as 1K which makes sense, it looks like brown black red gold red in the video

Thank You!

I google for PTCs but most of them have limited work cycles about 100 only

What PTCs are used by FLUKE?
 

Offline Electro Detective

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2715
  • Country: au
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #35 on: August 07, 2019, 10:05:55 pm »

I agree with your post, the price is just silly, for me I use it for work.
But I also just want to highly underline that there is another side to this, safety:
The Adapter is specified for CAT III 1000V/CAT IV 600V per EN61010.

I use my SV225 for a secondary purpose: to discharge capacitors in servos, as can be seen in the curve above it's not the best, but so far it has been useful to me.
Now imagine what would happen with an adapter actually assembled at ThreeHungLow Industries as you say.
Here I will give an idea: https://youtu.be/OEoazQ1zuUM?t=345
Just something to keep in mind when measuring high energy circuits which is the whole idea if you need this adapter in the first place.
I agree that buying a meter with LoZ mode is better, be careful though: I thought my Fluke 28-II had such a mode but it's a low pass filter, not low impedance!

TBH I would rather have the resistor and PTC inside a CAT rated meter housing, that I can physically check on,
rather than a glued up re-purposed USB box with a CAT rating,
that may have been soldered together and gooped up by a friday afternoon pub crawling assembler  ::)

and yes, I use the Low-Z mode for poor mans discharging duties as well, and may wait a while...  :=\

Still a better bet than dealing with surprise zaps  :o


EDIT:
Zap City  > youtube.com/watch?v=oahQRSRx_38

Every New Yorker should be issued with a Low-Z accessory and app for their phones   :popcorn:

« Last Edit: August 07, 2019, 10:31:49 pm by Electro Detective »
 

Offline rauldmTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 158
  • Country: mx
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #36 on: September 08, 2019, 04:30:35 am »
If you consider buying used, there is also the Metrahit12/14 from GMC (look for a thread named 'show your multimeter', there you can see mine.)
Also, some of the newer GMC multimeters have such a feature.

Really I didn't know nothing Metrawatt meters, I impressed with the price, normally all brands it has a high-end models to same price, Metrawatt is really expensive even with same specs, also I impressed with high-end are very especialized, for example the CAT rating is to low but 6.5 digits in a portable device is amazing. I think this meters play on other scale of market. I have Fluke 289, 28II, 87V and 117, also  keysight U1282A and Amprobe 37XR-A.
 

Offline BB3553AM

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 14
  • Country: fr
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #37 on: April 14, 2020, 05:47:16 pm »
Dear HKJ,

my sincere thanks and congratulations on your website : https://lygte-info.dk/review/DMMBrymen%20BM869s%20UK.html
I just bought a BM869s and a AN870 based on your reviews.

( I have a question about the AN870, but let's not pollute this thread)

regarding the PTC that were observed, are we able to identify the part number ?

I plan to do my own low impedance "network" for lowZ measurement , we can see indeed to 2 PTC on either side and a power resistor in the middle of those in this video about the sv225.

Thanks for help.
 

Offline BB3553AM

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 14
  • Country: fr
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #38 on: April 14, 2020, 09:05:20 pm »
Maybe this (family of) device could do the job ?

https://www.vishay.com/docs/29072/ptccl.pdf

 

Offline Per Hansson

  • Supporter
  • ****
  • Posts: 448
  • Country: se
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #39 on: April 15, 2020, 04:15:39 pm »
Not sure about the part number for the PTC.
But it would make sense that they reuse the same PTC as in their meters?
Check out some schematics for Fluke DMM's, some do exist for their slightly older models...
 

Offline BB3553AM

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 14
  • Country: fr
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #40 on: April 15, 2020, 08:20:23 pm »
Thanks for your contribution.

I think the C885 from epcos (now tdk) should be a good match : https://www.mouser.com/datasheet/2/136/OC_B59884_B59885_B59886-62199.pdf

By using 2 of them plus a 4w resistor of 1KOhm, we could achieve something very close to the sv225.

 

Offline Shock

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4376
  • Country: au
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #41 on: April 15, 2020, 11:16:01 pm »
I checked a couple of Fluke service manuals with parts listings and got 1.1k 20% tolerance for the PTCs. Part numbers were YS3961 and 911P67E112MW07.

What about B59774C0115A070 it's 1.1k.
I get the feeling Fluke has special order part dimensions for their MOVs and PTCs so if they are ever going into a multimeter check that first. I suspect they are probably manually sorted as well as 3.6K is a bit out there.
Soldering/Rework: Pace ADS200, Pace MBT350
Multimeters: Fluke 189, 87V, 117, 112   >>> WANTED STUFF <<<
Oszilloskopen: Lecroy 9314, Phillips PM3065, Tektronix 2215a, 314
 

Offline BB3553AM

  • Contributor
  • Posts: 14
  • Country: fr
Re: Dual impedance multimeter recommendations?
« Reply #42 on: April 16, 2020, 10:45:42 am »
Thank you Shock for the information. Much appreciated.

Indeed, the B59774C0115A070 is also a very good option.
« Last Edit: April 16, 2020, 12:24:49 pm by BB3553AM »
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf