320x240 (77k pix) or 256x192 (57k pix) as a minimum if you want any detailed information when working on circuit boards/components.
256 x 192 still sucks. I have an Amcrest thermal camera with 256 x 192, and it's useless for any kind of details. The thermal sensing works fine, and gives me the thermal data I need, but beyond that, no useful info. Impossible to see any small details.
It's likely because of the fixed focus that all aspect of details is out with the bathwater.
A small 8-dollar 8mm to 20mm cheap ZnSE lens from Aliexpress.. can make a big difference.
when using them in a closed-up macro view, like 1.25mm components.. I tried to stack them, both ZnSE and GaAS lenses, as Germanium lenses are very expensive.
There are certain consumer-based dongles, that nowadays seem to carry full-fledged autofocus.. was very close to pulling the trigger on one a few days ago under the singles day sale as they were going around 50% of the previous cost. fx Guide IR Mobir 2S (zoomed view) or 2T (wide) was down 200 to 250 US and GuideSense IR-algorithm called "Sensesmart" was pretty decent on the gun-style models like PC200/210 - but took a pass.. don't need another unit with 192x256 res / autofocus or not, - and it's such a hit or miss with these dongle-based thermal cameras that are eeking out of China the last few years, how well their app is.
One of the big Chinese microbolometer players IRay that mothers the company Infiray.. Even their better models with manual focus dials, like Infiray T3 series (384x288) and some of the T2 series like T2L etc (256x192).. are still relying on the app Xtherm, and its rubbish, with no manual span-control, and when asked why it aint implemented on their higher end models that goes up in the four digit, and only on the very cheap models between 100 to 200 bucks... the answer is usually - here is our SDK "you go and make your own app"
But there are some user-made apk's for Android and Windows, but the sharpening algorithm often leaves some to be desired.. very crude sharpening
Maybe it has changed, it's been a year or two back, since I checked it.
- but 256x192 can look pretty decent.. if I recall this video I made with a 256x192 core and a cheap battery heating device from CN, but the picture will often be a lot cleaner when in B/W and not with false colors..
https://i.imgur.com/v7vG9zZ.mp4 decent thermal-footage with so low resolution.
Seek (2016/17) Compact pro, which is a pretty noisy 320x240 core, and not much cleanup on the image, if any)
ZnSE + GAaS stacked, when look at some small 1.25mm components..interesting to sense how the actual components & heat/IR behave on the different traces.
- An example of the manual span adjustment on some 1.25mm resistors. (FF unit that peaks around 18hz )