| Products > Test Equipment |
| FeelTech FY6600 60MHz 2-Ch VCO Function Arbitrary Waveform Signal Generator |
| << < (420/450) > >> |
| radiolistener:
--- Quote from: rhb on September 22, 2019, 05:04:09 pm ---It would be really nice to see FOSS code that would allow other Chinese OEMs to clone the F***Techs and improve them. It could not happen to a more deserving company. --- End quote --- yeah, it will be great. If it will be released I will buy some FY6600 clone :) |
| soundtec:
I used Wavemanager plus to create a few compatible wave forms , version 4.13 of the program is included in the download for the 3224s here https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1hqqHqvfk1FKhzYSjJ-S6_SUTr_zx0fhp?usp=sharing Ive been using version 5.8 of the Feeltech software , and so far find Fremens 0.8 is unusable with a 'run time error 380' invalid property value, V 0.7 is usable but just for the basic channel functions . |
| fremen67:
--- Quote from: Miti on October 01, 2019, 07:30:43 pm ---Can anybody post a csv file that is accepted by FT software, or fremen's software? I can't figure out the format. I'm trying to do a simple ASK modulation on CH1 from CH2 and anything I try will just return an error message and shut down the program. Thanks, Miti --- End quote --- Find attached a sine wave created with the modified PC Software 0.8. This is the original FT format. You can download it to a standard FY6600 or a modified FY6600 with PC Software 0.8. |
| fremen67:
--- Quote from: CDaniel on September 30, 2019, 12:43:26 pm ---Just a sugestion , the frequency displayed is still hard to follow with just one decimal point when it is in MHz range for example ... I have to count allways how many digits are before the dot ;D . Would be nice to display MHz , KHz and to move the point accordingly . --- End quote --- Thank you for the feedback. Yes, as already written to sountec, this is planned. I will also add a thousands separator to ease the reading. This just a matter of prority. --- Quote from: CDaniel on September 30, 2019, 12:43:26 pm ---The sub-hertz many many digits ;D I think shouldn't be displayed when are not used ( set to 0 ) . --- End quote --- Not sure this will look nice but why not... --- Quote from: CDaniel on September 30, 2019, 12:43:26 pm ---If you go to the max with the tens of MHz digit ( by error or not ) , the rest of the display goes to max also and you lose what you have set , maybe you want 59.123456MHz . I think would be better not to let you go beyond 5 if 6 and the rest of the digits would be an invalid frequency . When you go down in frequency the same thing happens if you reach 0 and turn the encoder one more time , the rest of the digits are erased to zero , I don't think this is desirable . Zeroing the display could be usefull , but with a long press on the encoder or another combination when you are in frequency adjustment . --- End quote --- The behaviour your are describing is what I have on my RIGOL DP832 but there are much less digits on it… and I already find it painfull... In your example, with 59.123456MHz, this would be a pain to set 60.000000MHz... The behaviour I programmed is the one that was existing on the FY6600. It is also the behaviour of my RK8511 electronic load and my SIGLENT SDG2042X for the max limit. I don't know if there is a standard on that matter … What do others think? |
| fremen67:
--- Quote from: soundtec on October 01, 2019, 12:19:31 pm ---I noticed I needed a version of the original Feeltech software installed on the machine before Fremens would run ,I had been trying out the latest FY6900 version pc software ,maybe this caused the issues I am seeing , I wonder is there a particular version of the Feeltech pc software I should be using for maximum compatibillity to Fremen's FP code , --- End quote --- I tried to stay compatible at the beginning with a standard FY6600 but I had to modify the original protocol for the new functionnalities. I don't know if Feeltech changed the protocol for the FY6800 or FY6900 but logically the FY6600 version should be the most compatible with the new FP. Not sure why you would want to use it with the new FP anyway... --- Quote from: soundtec on October 01, 2019, 12:19:31 pm ---I did have another think about the double button press being required to select channel and mute/unmute , maybe a nice idea would be when you initially depress the channel 1 or 2 button have it select that channel to top if its not there already ,then let the unlatching of the button send the command to mute or unmute as required , now only a single press (and release) covers both functions , it only logical captain Fremen >:D --- End quote --- If I get you right, this would than be impossible to show CH1 for example if not displayed without changing CH1 output state …. the same for CH2. The problem is that there are few buttons so we have to compromise … The problem is exactly the same with measure, sweep and modulation functions. One push on the button will show the view if not already displayed, another push will activate the function. This is also now the standard way on oscilloscopes with common buttons for several channels: one push to select the channel or deactivate it if already selected. I don't say this is easy at the beginning but you get used to it :-// |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |