Products > Test Equipment
REVIEW - Rigol DS2072 - First Impressions of the DS2000 series from Rigol
Wim13:
--- Quote from: Carrington on July 01, 2013, 06:23:49 pm ---Another curious thing, look at the pictures.
Where is the difference?
--- End quote ---
i dont get it, please more ext
marmad:
--- Quote from: zibadun on July 01, 2013, 05:43:00 pm ---I think this function changes how captured samples are mapped to pixels on the screen to minimize aliasing. It doesn't change the way the signal is sampled. It works when scan rate is much slower than the sampling rate. What did you expect this button to do?
--- End quote ---
Anti-aliasing never changes how the waveform is sampled. But you seem to be thinking about IMAGE anti-aliasing - I'm speaking about WAVEFORM anti-aliasing; which is what a DSO is supposed to do if it has an anti-aliasing feature (it has nothing to do with jagged edges, pixels, etc).
This post and the following one provide more information.
Carrington:
--- Quote from: Wim13 on July 01, 2013, 06:43:37 pm ---
--- Quote from: Carrington on July 01, 2013, 06:23:49 pm ---Another curious thing, look at the pictures.
Where is the difference?
--- End quote ---
i dont get it, please more ext
--- End quote ---
IMHO, the BW is lower in the DS2202, but little more I can say. :)
I have a SDS8102V (real BW ~206MHz), when I have a DS2072 I will do more comparisons (DS2072 as DS2202).
What do you think?
Wim13:
--- Quote from: Carrington on July 01, 2013, 06:54:46 pm ---
--- Quote from: Wim13 on July 01, 2013, 06:43:37 pm ---
--- Quote from: Carrington on July 01, 2013, 06:23:49 pm ---Another curious thing, look at the pictures.
Where is the difference?
--- End quote ---
i dont get it, please more ext
--- End quote ---
IMHO, the BW is lower in the DS2202, but little more I can say. :)
I have a SDS8102V (real BW ~206MHz), when I have a DS2072 I will do more comparisons (DS2072 as DS2202).
What do you think?
--- End quote ---
I can not see on Agilent what the settings are...to compare
But what is lower then the 2202, to your opinion ?
See picture with a rise time of 1.5 nSec that is 350/1.5 is 233 Mhz,
what is also measured with a signal generator
Carrington:
--- Quote from: Wim13 on July 01, 2013, 07:07:35 pm ---
--- Quote from: Carrington on July 01, 2013, 06:54:46 pm ---
--- Quote from: Wim13 on July 01, 2013, 06:43:37 pm ---
--- Quote from: Carrington on July 01, 2013, 06:23:49 pm ---Another curious thing, look at the pictures.
Where is the difference?
--- End quote ---
i dont get it, please more ext
--- End quote ---
IMHO, the BW is lower in the DS2202, but little more I can say. :)
I have a SDS8102V (real BW ~206MHz), when I have a DS2072 I will do more comparisons (DS2072 as DS2202).
What do you think?
--- End quote ---
I can not see on Agilent what the settings are...to compare
But what is lower then the 2202, to your opinion ?
See picture with a rise time of 1.5 nSec that is 350/1.5 is 233 Mhz,
what is also measured with a signal generator
--- End quote ---
The ridges (In the images above), should have higher frequency components that 233MHz.
It seems that these only be seen with more than 300MHz of BW.
My SDS8102V have a similar BW and I can make a better comparison. :)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version