Products > Test Equipment
REVIEW - Rigol DS2072 - First Impressions of the DS2000 series from Rigol
<< < (406/566) > >>
Carrington:
@Teneyes: This reminds me to the persistence effect. Although probably not have anything to do.


* 100MHz_Vec_2ch_trig0.png and 100MHz_dots_2ch_trig0.png overlay:


Note: Very nice the point clouds.  :)
marmad:

--- Quote from: Wim13 on December 24, 2013, 08:13:15 pm ---Also got more noise, see picture with only 1 channel, and then enable channel 2,
the difference is clear, on 1 nS the sample rate is to low for two channels.
The performance is worse on 1 nS then on 2 nS.

--- End quote ---

@Wim: I think the problem in the images you posted has to do with the intensity-grading - not with noise or sample rate. Rigol seems to have fixed the intensity-grading issues in Delayed Sweep mode, but not those when two channels are turned on in Normal Sweep at time bases <= 50ns/div (I reported both problems to them via Drieg back in early June).

Look at this sequence of images made at 1ns/div: all of them have intensity set to 50% - except the last one, which is intensity at 0%. You can see that with two channels on in Delayed Sweep, the intensity is a pretty good match to the images with just one channel on. But in Normal Sweep, the intensity has to be set to 0% to get a closer match.

EDIT: I've added the following back into the bug list at the beginning:

2) The way the scope handles intensity grading at time bases <= 50ns/div when two channels are enabled with Normal Sweep is not the same as all other modes - it feels incongruous and incorrect.
[FW v.01.01.00.02 / FW v.02.01.00.03]
Teneyes:
Intensity grade seems ok at slow scan rates, but not so good as scan rate increases
for both channels. Faster than 200nsec/div is limit
Does it seem that the min. persistence should vary for each condition and it does NOT?

1Ch alone seems OK
EV:
Here are pictures abot this 2 channel trace problem. There are first 3 pairs of pictures with 1, 2 and 5 ns time base. Pictures with vectors and dots are from same sweep in normal single mode. 2 last pictures are from auto sweep.
EV:
It looks that this sin(x)/(x) algoritm is not working very well if both channels are on.
Navigation
Message Index
Next page
Previous page
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...

Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod