Products > Test Equipment
REVIEW - Rigol DS2072 - First Impressions of the DS2000 series from Rigol
CustomEngineerer:
Also from the release notes. So, is this version 00.03.05.00.01 or 00.04.04.00.05? Also shows the date as 2016/05/31, so has this release really been ready that long? I seem to remember the MSO/DSO4000 getting a firmware update a couple of months back. Maybe Rigol just grabbed the wrong text for these release notes, or maybe the same bug was present on the 4000 and got fixed in the 2000 as well?
[Updated Contents]
--------------------
v00.04.04.00.05 2016/05/31
- Modified the naming rule for saving screen snap
- Fixed the bug of the wave stop updating
- Fixed the bug of Math expression
marmad:
--- Quote from: CustomEngineerer on August 04, 2016, 10:34:59 pm ---Also from the release notes. So, is this version 00.03.05.00.01 or 00.04.04.00.05? Also shows the date as 2016/05/31, so has this release really been ready that long?
--- End quote ---
System Info reports "Software version: 00.03.05.00.01 / Date: June 20th, 2016"
I assume the v00.04.04.00.05 listed in the Release Notes is a typo.
marmad:
--- Quote from: JDubU on August 04, 2016, 04:22:28 pm ---They also included a text file of release notes/change log for each firmware version to date.
--- End quote ---
FWIW, there are literally dozens of changes, extras, features, etc. that they've implemented in later firmware versions which are not documented in these release notes (just one that springs to mind: when they added EXT trigger as a source for the Pulse Trigger).
I've never understood why this is the case. Bad or lazy record-keeping? They don't want a paper-trail of when certain features are implemented? The public release notes differ from the private? Who knows?
JDubU:
--- Quote from: marmad on August 04, 2016, 10:53:59 pm ---
--- Quote from: JDubU on August 04, 2016, 04:22:28 pm ---They also included a text file of release notes/change log for each firmware version to date.
--- End quote ---
FWIW, there are literally dozens of changes, extras, features, etc. that they've implemented in later firmware versions which are not documented in these release notes (just one that springs to mind: when they added EXT trigger as a source for the Pulse Trigger).
I've never understood why this is the case. Bad or lazy record-keeping? They don't want a paper-trail of when certain features are implemented? The public release notes differ from the private? Who knows?
--- End quote ---
Rigol support also included a web link to another release note in the email. I don't know if this is the public release note that you are referring to. It lists more changes/fixes for each release but does not include an entry for this latest firmware. It is attached below.
marmad:
--- Quote from: JDubU on August 04, 2016, 11:16:44 pm ---Rigol support also included a web link to another release note in the email. I don't know if this is the public release note that you are referring to. It lists more changes/fixes for each release but does not include an entry for this latest firmware. It is attached below.
--- End quote ---
Yes, this is more detailed and closer to something that looks like real release notes (although it only goes back to v00.03.01.00.04).
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version