Products > Test Equipment

REVIEW - Rigol DS2072 - First Impressions of the DS2000 series from Rigol

<< < (185/566) > >>

Hydrawerk:
Compared to DSOX2000, Tek DPO2000 or even Rigol DS4000. Well not a big issue.

marmad:

--- Quote from: Hydrawerk on May 10, 2013, 10:57:42 pm ---Compared to DSOX2000, Tek DPO2000 or even Rigol DS4000. Well not a big issue.

--- End quote ---

No, it certainly isn't. Quit being a troll.

Pinkus:

--- Quote from: ve7xen on May 09, 2013, 05:26:08 pm ---DS2072 and DS2102 are presumably identical except for the 2ns timebase, given the tested -3dB response of the DS2072 and the fact that only the 100MHz PGA filter is engaged for bandwidth limiting

--- End quote ---
?? I thought, the DS2102 does not have the 2ns timebase - or am I wrong?
Peter

marmad:

--- Quote from: PeterK13 on May 11, 2013, 05:29:53 pm ---?? I thought, the DS2102 does not have the 2ns timebase - or am I wrong?
Peter

--- End quote ---

No, you're right. As far as we know, there might be no difference between the DS2072 and DS2102 besides the front panel sticker (and the model number in firmware). I haven't read anything that would indicate otherwise yet.

Wim13:
That they are the same , you can also find it back in the bandwidth graph,
here is the graph of my 2072, measured with a signal generator and a measuring head on the entry of the 2072.
The measuring head is  compensating every loss from generator to the entry of the DSO

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod