Products > Test Equipment
First picture on EEVblog of the new R&S MXO4 series oscilloscope :)
2N3055:
--- Quote from: bozidarms on February 08, 2023, 02:13:30 pm ---
--- Quote ---That is analytic scope.
--- End quote ---
"Analytic scope" without at least Trends, Tracks and Histograms???
I don't really believe that...
--- End quote ---
Are you serious ?
Honestly I didn't even check so far... I EXPECTED it to have at least that...
1000€ scopes have that nowadays...
Thank you for this nugget of information... :-+
That is absolutely epic fail...
What is the price for then... ?
bozidarms:
Not even simply Histicons ?!?
Prices from Batronix:
R&S® MXO44-2410 4x 1 GHz € 22.848,- inkl. 19% MwSt.
R&S® MXO4-B1 MSO Option € 3.332,-
R&S® MXO4-B6 Funktionsgenerator € 1.666,-
R&S® MXO4-B108 Speichererweiterung 800 Mpts € 3.094,-
R&S® MXO4-K510 I2C, SPI, RS232, UART Dekoder € 2.856,-
R&S® MXO4-K520 CAN, CAN-FD, CAN-XL Dekoder € 2.856,-
R&S® MXO4-K36 Bode Plot € 2.380,-
-------------------------
€ 39.032,- :-DD
EEVblog:
--- Quote from: 2N3055 on February 08, 2023, 11:57:37 am ---
--- Quote from: EEVblog on February 07, 2023, 06:15:13 am ---
--- Quote from: EEVblog on February 07, 2023, 02:49:24 am ---Finishing shooting the MXO4 unboxing video and tried to test the 4.5Mwfms/sec update, and, well, I don't see it :-//
--- End quote ---
I had the measurements turned on. They said they are going to improve this in future firmware. So much for the ASIC.
--- End quote ---
That is analytic scope. It is not used that way...
And 4.5 Mtriggers in segmented mode is very good and very useful.
Set scope to long capture and set search for pulse width less than normal clock width. You will have 100% POI.
Or use pulse width trigger, with segmented mode, and assemble statistics of how glitch happens... Also 100% POI..
--- End quote ---
No, it has nothing to do with segmented mode at all.
It is literally an architecture bug/limitation where if you turn on the horizontal measurements (like frequency) the update rate drops from 1M/wfs/s to 1K/wfs/s.
nctnico:
Seems reasonable to me as the data needs to be processed for the measurement. Ofcourse there is a choice between using only the Nth acquisition to base calculations on OR doing calculations on all acquisitions. In the first option there is a disconnect between what is shown on screen and what is being calculated.
EEVblog:
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version