Products > Test Equipment
Fluke 115 and Nanofarad Capacitance Readings
Barry A. Waters:
--- Quote from: BeBuLamar on April 22, 2023, 12:01:45 pm ---So you didn't return the meter?
--- End quote ---
If you were to read my posts above you may gain a better understanding of what transpired.
Barry
BeBuLamar:
I read that you brought the meter back and they replaced it in the first post. In another post you said the second meter is packed for return and no accessible. To my best understanding you returned 2 meters. Isn't that so?
Barry A. Waters:
--- Quote from: BeBuLamar on April 22, 2023, 03:50:29 pm ---... To my best understanding you returned 2 meters. Isn't that so?
--- End quote ---
No. I would suggest you slow the speed of your reading and place more emphasis on comprehension.
Barry
4thDoctorWhoFan:
--- Quote from: Barry A. Waters on April 25, 2023, 12:24:06 pm ---
--- Quote from: BeBuLamar on April 22, 2023, 03:50:29 pm ---... To my best understanding you returned 2 meters. Isn't that so?
--- End quote ---
No. I would suggest you slow the speed of your reading and place more emphasis on comprehension.
Barry
--- End quote ---
I would have to agree with BeBuLamar.
In reply#7, you stated: "it sounds like my experience is the odd man out so back the meter goes (for the second and final time!). I ordered another 115 from a totally different supplier in another state to insure I don't get one from the same batch as the two I've had. We'll see how that goes.
So what that you went through 2 meters because of operator error. It's no big deal.
Swainster:
I think the point of contention is that the meters had been destroyed. While its not impossible, i personally doubt it as Fluke Service will probably run the meter through the official performance test before destroying them. I think it's been established that they would have passed this test.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version