| Products > Test Equipment |
| Fluke 289 Meter |
| << < (22/36) > >> |
| mr.fabe:
--- Quote from: Gandalf_Sr on November 03, 2019, 01:53:48 pm ---PM sent but I now think it's a real PayPal email but I'm still suspicious that, when PayPal tries to pull the money back for the refund, there won't be anything there and it will fail. --- End quote --- I always contact PP direct if I need to verify a transaction's legitimacy. |
| Black Phoenix:
PM replied - Yes it is real: Came from: --- Code: ---ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@paypal.com header.s=pp-dkim1 header.b=WA5vr7DG; spf=pass (google.com: domain of service@paypal.com designates 173.0.84.226 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=service@paypal.com; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=paypal.com Return-Path: <service@paypal.com> Received: from mx2.slc.paypal.com (mx1.slc.paypal.com. [173.0.84.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id [removed] for <[removed]@gmail.com> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); --- End code --- And the owner of the IP: --- Code: ---[Querying whois.arin.net] [whois.arin.net] # # ARIN WHOIS data and services are subject to the Terms of Use # available at: [url]https://www.arin.net/whois_tou.html[/url] # # If you see inaccuracies in the results, please report at # [url]https://www.arin.net/public/whoisinaccuracy/index.xhtml[/url] # # # Query terms are ambiguous. The query is assumed to be: # "n 173.0.84.226" # # Use "?" to get help. # # # The following results may also be obtained via: # [url]https://whois.arin.net/rest/nets;q=173.0.84.226?showDetails=true&showARIN=false&showNonArinTopLevelNet=false&ext=netref2[/url] # NetRange: 173.0.80.0 - 173.0.95.255 CIDR: 173.0.80.0/20 NetName: PAYPAL-SITE NetHandle: NET-173-0-80-0-1 Parent: NET173 (NET-173-0-0-0-0) NetType: Direct Assignment OriginAS: AS17012 Organization: PayPal, Inc. (PAYPAL) RegDate: 2010-06-22 Updated: 2015-11-20 Ref: [url]https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-173-0-80-0-1[/url] OrgName: PayPal, Inc. OrgId: PAYPAL Address: 2211 N. First St. City: San Jose StateProv: CA PostalCode: 95131 Country: US RegDate: 2001-08-17 Updated: 2015-07-16 Ref: [url]https://whois.arin.net/rest/org/PAYPAL[/url] OrgAbuseHandle: PAYPA-ARIN OrgAbuseName: PayPal Network OrgAbusePhone: +1-408-967-5100 OrgAbuseEmail: corpnetwork@paypal.com OrgAbuseRef: [url]https://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/PAYPA-ARIN[/url] OrgTechHandle: PAYPA-ARIN OrgTechName: PayPal Network OrgTechPhone: +1-408-967-5100 OrgTechEmail: corpnetwork@paypal.com OrgTechRef: [url]https://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/PAYPA-ARIN[/url] RTechHandle: PAYPA1-ARIN RTechName: PayPal RTechPhone: +1-480-862-7260 RTechEmail: dl-paypal-sne@paypal.com RTechRef: [url]https://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/PAYPA1-ARIN[/url] RAbuseHandle: PAYPA1-ARIN RAbuseName: PayPal RAbusePhone: +1-480-862-7260 RAbuseEmail: dl-paypal-sne@paypal.com RAbuseRef: [url]https://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/PAYPA1-ARIN[/url] RNOCHandle: PAYPA1-ARIN RNOCName: PayPal RNOCPhone: +1-480-862-7260 RNOCEmail: dl-paypal-sne@paypal.com RNOCRef: [url]https://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/PAYPA1-ARIN[/url] # # ARIN WHOIS data and services are subject to the Terms of Use # available at: [url]https://www.arin.net/whois_tou.html[/url] # # If you see inaccuracies in the results, please report at # [url]https://www.arin.net/public/whoisinaccuracy/index.xhtml[/url] # --- End code --- |
| Terry01:
What a carry on you've had buddy! I am sure Ebay will cover your $'s if it turns out the scammer has already pocketed your dosh and won't refund you. I have had the "pending" thing when taking withdrawals from PayPal before even though I have put 1000's through them and had no problems making much bigger deposits and withdrawals in the past. When I queried it they said it was just random checks that are in place and not to worry. I am sure it was 24hrs or something like that and it came good sure enough. I am almost sure you'll get your cash back in the end, Ebay looks after the buyer and the seller can suck a fat one. |
| Gandalf_Sr:
I know I'll get my money back eventually and, even if I didn't, it wouldn't be the end of the World but it's the principle that annoys me; that plus the sheer hassle of going through all this bullshit (I like that I can say bullshit on eevBlog). |
| BravoV:
Why not just 287 if you can live with it's limitation compared to 289 ? And of course while still decently priced. 287 is quite decent imo. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |