I guess you don't have to give a shit because you're full of it.
Then you post this ridiculous shit about those 33 seconds:
To me it looks like GDS-2000A is unable to do shading in "density"-fashion (something that velocity modulation of electron beam produces in analog oscilloscopes).
i don't see any problem with color grading implementation,
Color grading uses a lookup table from the intensity values - if the intensity values are coarse, the color grading will be as well..Quote...and i can clearly see that on Rigol you need to turn the knob for an hour ^^ to get from min to max).
Again, you're spouting nonsense about the Rigol which is untrue. There is rarely a time when you have to turn a knob very long on the Rigol - it uses TWO knobs (slow/fast) for any variable that has a wide range - plus it has software acceleration implemented on it's encoders - which the Instek seems to be lacking.
plus it has software acceleration implemented on it's encoders - which the Instek seems to be lacking.
You should know me better Mark. Cool down a bit.
To me it looks like GDS-2000A is unable to do shading in "density"-fashion (something that velocity modulation of electron beam produces in analog oscilloscopes).
I guess you don't have to give a shit because you're full of it.no, i'm not from US, so no chance, not full of brainshit. Jealous? or simply menstruation?
You should know me better Mark. Cool down a bit.
I guess you don't have to give a shit because you're full of it.no, i'm not from US, so no chance, not full of brainshit. Jealous? or simply menstruation?
You should know me better Mark. Cool down a bit.Fyi, I used the "report to moderator" link below Tinhead's post above. "This post escalated personal attacks beyond reason. Wasn't the first post in the series but this or the post it quotes went over the top."
I'm usually pretty impressed with the respect everyone shows each other (even with there's no basis for said respect haha) and the good taste in the language used. Some disagree about "sh*t", and Dave uses it himself occasionally, but it's over my line for use in public. Further, a general statement about a whole country and a dig on women has no place here - at least not on this part of the forum.
Sorry to be "up tight" but hopefully all posts involved are removed or edited and this is put in the past without further issue.
Edit: clarification
Further, a general statement about a whole country

and I hope Thomas felt the same
Well, it's your prerogative to report this, but you should know that Thomas and I have a personal relationship - having exchanged many private messages and emails - so speaking for myself (and I hope Thomas felt the same), I never felt the attacks were personal, but were merely 'roughhousing' (that, admittedly, we perhaps pushed too far).
in Europe we can (still) luckily speak free, about womans, Al Quida, US, what so ever ... we don't have any problems with whatsoever
skin color, abortion, jesus, asgards, islam, 09/11 magic planes or G.W.B.
....
And btw, a general statement that chinese manufacturer producing only crap/copycat is ok? Wakeup, G.W.B. is not anymore.
....
Anyhow, I see now you and Marmad are friends so that's good - I know how that goes haha. Just maybe realize if you're goading each other in a public space you may raise eyebrows among those who don't know better.
... but there are few enough women in electronics the way it is. We may as well try to make them feel welcome, eh?
What do the dvm module?
Looking at it Rigol copied the Agilent path and Instek copied the Tek path. (...) the Instek doesn't function like Dave expects it to - e.g. like the Agilent.
One thing I will be grilling the US based Instek guys about though is the persistence levels since that kind of irks me a little bit and I would like a straight answer.
-G
One thing I will be grilling the US based Instek guys about though is the persistence levels since that kind of irks me a little bit and I would like a straight answer.
What do the dvm module?I could not find any info anywhere. (GW Instek web, user manuals...)
Ok, we know that the DPO is not a strong point of GDS-2000A.
My DSOX2002A almost never goes slower.
I'm usually pretty impressed with the respect everyone shows each other (even with there's no basis for said respect haha) and the good taste in the language used. Some disagree about "sh*t", and Dave uses it himself occasionally, but it's over my line for use in public. Further, a general statement about a whole country and a dig on women has no place here - at least not on this part of the forum.
And Dave, what do you think about the fact that this scope has no fine horizontal or vertical control? It's strange. Most scopes do have fine settings (at Rigol and Agilent you only must push the knob). Well, only Owon doesn't have fine settings, as far as i know.
And Dave, what do you think about the fact that this scope has no fine horizontal or vertical control? It's strange. Most scopes do have fine settings (at Rigol and Agilent you only must push the knob). Well, only Owon doesn't have fine settings, as far as i know.
I didn't notice that. If that's the case then that's stupid, they need to fix that.
they need to fix that.
Ok, we know that the DPO is not a strong point of GDS-2000A. Now let's discuss it's other features. IMHO the XY mode is well implemeted and sophisticated (see manual) but I don't know what is it useful for.![]()
My DSOX2002A almost never goes slower.![]()
Because it can show only 4 auto measurements and has rather small memory 50kpoints per channel. And no statistics feature.
![]()
![]()