I've heard another interesting theory now: Processor Load.
A colleague suggested that the computations the scope does might take almost all of the processor power there is, and, at some points, more - which makes the software, which detects this, switch to lower resolution.
ehm, what i he, rocket science engineer?
It does not have anything with processor load (and to be very honest the current version is creating less load),
when the calculation task is ready then it is ready and data will be displayed - when it is too complex
to get processed within one waveform cycle then the waveform rate will drop - but the signal remains the same.
It does not have anythign to do with resolution (and no, the software is not switching down resolution, this is not a PC game)
as the sampling is real time on ADC and definitely fast enough pre-postprocessed on FPGA.
The data is then in memory and will be bw filtered (remember - fw is calculating corner freq. based on model and applying it to
stored waveform), then alligned and filtered again, parallely FFT and measurments are running, and finaly displayed on screen.
But for this to be true, all of those scopes must have these effects, right?
all these or all DSOs?
all DSOs are doing many math things to filter/dither/interleave/restore the signal from sampled data.
There are many parameters to be watched, many error sources.
"all these" is not exactly truth, because it depends on your setup (btw,why you care about while measuring
repetitive signals? Use avg and don't undesample and you will be fine. With random signals these "effects"
are almost not given as the filter is from what i can see skipping first 4 waveforms).
Tinhead:
Would be interesting what exactly you were able to reproduce.
Also, I still don't understand what's normal about video part#1, the wild jumping between settings.
the jumping signal like on your video as said above, depends on resolution, signal quality and sampling rate
not a big deal.
My colleague, used to expensive gear, doesn't agree at all that this is normal for an intact
oscilloscope with the stated capabilities.
what is normal ? DSO is always trying to show a smooth waveform from a bunch of dots,
especially on interleaved DSOs not a big deal to get distortion due the interleaving process - page 9 Agilent 5989-5732EN
app note. You can do many tricks to try to allign waveforms from MANY ADCs to one smooth waveform,
some of the tricks are just pure filtering. When the signal (in your case the RF component of your signal) is on the
filter border the waveform might switch from not filtered to too much filtered anly because the filter don't know
and will never know what is now distortion coming from interpolation and what is RF component of the signal.
As i said above, don't care that much about repetetive signals as avg sampling is what you should use for such signals,
for random signals there is no issue because the firmware is skipping 4 waveforms