FIRE & SMOKE reward when you get to the end of the video, NICE!
Some manual spec busting too.
If I'm interpreting this video and the ZT-102 video, correctly, while lacking some of the extra features, it seems the ZT-102 is overall more robust, correct?
The ZT102 was damaged at 3KV. The KT6000 was damaged at 4KV. So no, I would not interpret the ZT102 as being more robust.
Your interpretation may only consider the voltage modes of the two meters where I am looking for any electrical failure.
The two Fluke videos I linked of the 87V are interesting as they don't functional test the meter between levels and they only test the one mode. Can the 87V really survive the levels they show in during the video, clearly it depends on the test procedure. It did very poorly in my testing because I look at all the modes and test the meters between each level.
The Hioki was a rare exception where electrically the meter was not damaged but the plastic was starting to melt. The meter could have done much better in the tests had the plastic insert been extended. So I made a note of it and moved on.
It is because of these details that I leave the videos on-line. If someone has a question about what was done, or how a meter failed, they just need to watch the video.