| Products > Test Equipment |
| How to promote an USB oscilloscope to individual engineers? I am the Loto instru |
| << < (22/26) > >> |
| jiangtao.lv:
--- Quote from: zachik on February 10, 2021, 04:26:41 pm ---Jiangtao, Is it possible to use your scope and logic analyzer with Pulse View open source software from Sigrok? Also, for logic analyzer functionality - I do have to buy scope as well. Right? (I am only interested in logic analyzer, since I already have a decent stand alone scope) Thanks. --- End quote --- We actually open source the software interface of the oscilloscope, but we have not announced and supported it on the open source platform. We don't have enough energy to do this. However, I did see that the platform you mentioned has open source support for our equipment. Then no one contacted us to ask for open source materials, and I don't know how they support it. We did not refer to these open source rules when we developed it, so I guess the support is not good enough. It is true that our logic analyzer is only an accessory of the oscilloscope, the oscilloscope is the protagonist, and the logic analyzer cannot work independently. Frankly speaking, if we only use the logic analyzer, our product does not have any advantages. I think there are many in the market that are better than our logic analyzer, so we are not sure to separate it into a product. |
| S. Petrukhin:
--- Quote from: jiangtao.lv on January 27, 2019, 03:09:49 am ---I'm a complete newcomer for overseas market.Any way of cooperation, I will seriously consider, such as writing promotional articles, acting as a sales agent, recommending it to other engineers,recommend retailers for me? --- End quote --- It looks nice! But I only noticed the rising/falling edge trigger only. This is very poor, in digital measurements the trigger should be much more complicated. For serious analog measurements, we don't see enough measurement resolution: the beam is very thin and clean - I don't think you managed to make such a quiet input, this is an indicator of low resolution, most likely. As a result, you have some signal passing indicator. That's a lot on the market. What do you suggest is better? Forgive the harshness, but the market is even more brutal. :) |
| jiangtao.lv:
|
| jiangtao.lv:
|
| jiangtao.lv:
--- Quote from: S. Petrukhin on February 15, 2021, 10:37:16 am --- --- Quote from: jiangtao.lv on January 27, 2019, 03:09:49 am ---I'm a complete newcomer for overseas market.Any way of cooperation, I will seriously consider, such as writing promotional articles, acting as a sales agent, recommending it to other engineers,recommend retailers for me? --- End quote --- It looks nice! But I only noticed the rising/falling edge trigger only. This is very poor, in digital measurements the trigger should be much more complicated. For serious analog measurements, we don't see enough measurement resolution: the beam is very thin and clean - I don't think you managed to make such a quiet input, this is an indicator of low resolution, most likely. As a result, you have some signal passing indicator. That's a lot on the market. What do you suggest is better? Forgive the harshness, but the market is even more brutal. :) --- End quote --- Sorry for my English too, you lost me .I don't get it.Do you mean the trigger needs more modes ?or do you suggest it need higher sampling rate when triggering? |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |