Author Topic: IC testers, do they work?  (Read 9719 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline RiRaRiTopic starter

  • Regular Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 137
  • Country: hr
Re: IC testers, do they work?
« Reply #25 on: August 08, 2023, 11:08:08 pm »
I forgot to mention, i need it for testing ic in solid state radios, tape players etc
 

Offline alm

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2903
  • Country: 00
Re: IC testers, do they work?
« Reply #26 on: August 08, 2023, 11:30:38 pm »
I forgot to mention, i need it for testing ic in solid state radios, tape players etc
So mostly analog ICs like opamps? Then no, I don't think any of these cheap IC testers are going to be of any value. I'd focus on in-circuit trouble shooting and if necessary a simple test setup on a breadboard to test the basic operation of an op-amp for example.
 
The following users thanked this post: Someone, egonotto

Online David Aurora

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 472
  • Country: au
Re: IC testers, do they work?
« Reply #27 on: August 09, 2023, 12:04:52 am »
Except it's not even a go/no-go as they dont specify what has been tested. A diode test on a multimeter generates some measurements which can be directly applied to the end use (screening for matched forward voltage or checking for excessive reverse leakage are both practical on a multimeter) but a widget that says "diode*"

* probably.

Is not a test. Look at the good link above
For a tester that makes analog measurements on the outputs, have a look at the Tauntek IC tester:

http://tauntek.com/LogICTester-low-cost-logic-chip-tester.htm

It's just a pcb + pre-programmed microcontrollers. You'll have to supply some commonly available parts to build it.

List of supported devices: http://tauntek.com/ctchiplist.pdf

A blog post about it:

https://www.barbouri.com/2021/09/13/building-the-tauntek-logic-ic-tester/
A basic tester that has some limits etc, very different from a device which tells you what it thinks the chip is (identifies).
Again, you're looking at this from an overly ambitious perspective. My analogy with the diode test was precisely that when you're quickly sweeping through with one as a go/no go test you AREN'T using it to match forward voltages and so on. It's just "Is it blatantly fucked? Yes? In the bin it goes". Same with these cheap IC testers.

As a quick example of both the analogy and the actual use case- on one job today a power supply board was shutting down. I had seen the exact same fault on another unit yesterday, so the first thing I did was probe the rectifier diodes I had seen fail before and found a shorted one as expected. I don't remotely care about the precise forward voltage when using the meter for this, all I want to know is if the diodes are basically OK or not. In the case of the IC tester, earlier tonight I had a channel strip from a mixing console up on the bench. On these particular strips I've seen one particular IC kill audio on a few of them, so if one goes down now I'll routinely pull that IC and throw it in the tester. If it fails I can replace it on the spot while I'm at the studio and the channel will likely spring back to life. No need to wire up the channel with a bench supply, set up a scope, etc., if it's as simple as a bad IC I know and it's sorted in a minute.
If you are looking for shorts, why bother with diode test? Just use continuity mode and listen for beep. You framed the discussion around diode test.... which is not comparable to these automated IC "testers". I'll suggest they're much closer to continuity beepers in information content than a diode test mode.

So when you say a "tester" which model/style are you referring to? what information does it provide? is its documentation available online?
There are a range of products out there with wildly different capabilities, the device you refer to may well have much more intelligence than the example the OP is asking about. What passes as "ok" in these cheap testers doesnt always function in real circuits, thats the biggest problem as it provides a false sense of security/validation.

This is the weirdest hill to die on.

First off, about your great advice about how I should use continuity mode for the tests described above- you realise a diode or transistor can fail open as well as short, right? A quick diode test will give you a ballpark idea of a working device and you can move on from there. The fact that you don't get this ought to automatically disqualify you from this conversation because this is real troubleshooting 101 shit.

These devices are NOT analogous to continuity testers. I can put 3 different IC's in them one after another and it will tell me what they are or if they're cooked. Absolutely nobody in their right mind has any expectation that they will pick obscure/intermittent faults that might cause them not to match the data sheet specs, this is just some bizarre bee you have in your bonnet about them. Nobody is using these things to launch rockets, it's just a go/no go tool to speed up troubleshooting. You still need to use your brain and judgement beyond that point if there are doubts about a part.

With regard to your argument that it's not a real world test- welcome to planet earth. Do you think a multimeter is a real world test for resistors/capacitors/diodes/etc? Of course it isn't. It doesn't need to be. It'll tell me if a part reads roughly what it should under simple, low voltage conditions and in most cases that is perfectly fine to get the job done. There are other more advanced tools available when required, and the same goes for IC testing.
 

Offline Someone

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5155
  • Country: au
    • send complaints here
Re: IC testers, do they work?
« Reply #28 on: August 09, 2023, 12:19:09 am »
Except it's not even a go/no-go as they dont specify what has been tested. A diode test on a multimeter generates some measurements which can be directly applied to the end use (screening for matched forward voltage or checking for excessive reverse leakage are both practical on a multimeter) but a widget that says "diode*"

* probably.

Is not a test. Look at the good link above
For a tester that makes analog measurements on the outputs, have a look at the Tauntek IC tester:

http://tauntek.com/LogICTester-low-cost-logic-chip-tester.htm

It's just a pcb + pre-programmed microcontrollers. You'll have to supply some commonly available parts to build it.

List of supported devices: http://tauntek.com/ctchiplist.pdf

A blog post about it:

https://www.barbouri.com/2021/09/13/building-the-tauntek-logic-ic-tester/
A basic tester that has some limits etc, very different from a device which tells you what it thinks the chip is (identifies).
Again, you're looking at this from an overly ambitious perspective. My analogy with the diode test was precisely that when you're quickly sweeping through with one as a go/no go test you AREN'T using it to match forward voltages and so on. It's just "Is it blatantly fucked? Yes? In the bin it goes". Same with these cheap IC testers.

As a quick example of both the analogy and the actual use case- on one job today a power supply board was shutting down. I had seen the exact same fault on another unit yesterday, so the first thing I did was probe the rectifier diodes I had seen fail before and found a shorted one as expected. I don't remotely care about the precise forward voltage when using the meter for this, all I want to know is if the diodes are basically OK or not. In the case of the IC tester, earlier tonight I had a channel strip from a mixing console up on the bench. On these particular strips I've seen one particular IC kill audio on a few of them, so if one goes down now I'll routinely pull that IC and throw it in the tester. If it fails I can replace it on the spot while I'm at the studio and the channel will likely spring back to life. No need to wire up the channel with a bench supply, set up a scope, etc., if it's as simple as a bad IC I know and it's sorted in a minute.
If you are looking for shorts, why bother with diode test? Just use continuity mode and listen for beep. You framed the discussion around diode test.... which is not comparable to these automated IC "testers". I'll suggest they're much closer to continuity beepers in information content than a diode test mode.

So when you say a "tester" which model/style are you referring to? what information does it provide? is its documentation available online?
There are a range of products out there with wildly different capabilities, the device you refer to may well have much more intelligence than the example the OP is asking about. What passes as "ok" in these cheap testers doesnt always function in real circuits, thats the biggest problem as it provides a false sense of security/validation.

This is the weirdest hill to die on.

First off, about your great advice about how I should use continuity mode for the tests described above- you realise a diode or transistor can fail open as well as short, right? A quick diode test will give you a ballpark idea of a working device and you can move on from there. The fact that you don't get this ought to automatically disqualify you from this conversation because this is real troubleshooting 101 shit.

These devices are NOT analogous to continuity testers. I can put 3 different IC's in them one after another and it will tell me what they are or if they're cooked. Absolutely nobody in their right mind has any expectation that they will pick obscure/intermittent faults that might cause them not to match the data sheet specs, this is just some bizarre bee you have in your bonnet about them. Nobody is using these things to launch rockets, it's just a go/no go tool to speed up troubleshooting. You still need to use your brain and judgement beyond that point if there are doubts about a part.

With regard to your argument that it's not a real world test- welcome to planet earth. Do you think a multimeter is a real world test for resistors/capacitors/diodes/etc? Of course it isn't. It doesn't need to be. It'll tell me if a part reads roughly what it should under simple, low voltage conditions and in most cases that is perfectly fine to get the job done. There are other more advanced tools available when required, and the same goes for IC testing.
Lol, I point out a comparative example/analogy and you nail that to the nth percent rather than stick to the thread topic?

As above, if they are a go/no-go tester then where is the threshold for pass/fail? what do they actually test? You and Fungus seem to be ignoring that while claiming they are perfectly good testers. I say it isn't a tester because there is no documentation or evidence of what has been tested.

I put all that context in my opening post yet you come back and try to argue... something?
Probably more correctly described as a IC identifier rather than a tester, there are no pass/fail criteria or performance measurement as would be associated with testing.
Everyone else in the thread is more realistic and agrees they are some basic tool which is of little confidence. Many posters offered slightly more expensive tools that offer documentation and defined test capability along with increased functionality.

So how about instead of just making noise you actually lay out your explanation of what they test, and why that is useful. Saying they tell you if the item is "working" is some non specific threshold, untrustworthy, particularly these extreme low cost items where the underlying implementation is subject to change (as it was never specified or documented) as long as it still meets the advertised function of telling you which logical pinout the chip is (identification).
 
The following users thanked this post: helius

Online David Aurora

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 472
  • Country: au
Re: IC testers, do they work?
« Reply #29 on: August 09, 2023, 12:19:47 am »
I forgot to mention, i need it for testing ic in solid state radios, tape players etc
So mostly analog ICs like opamps? Then no, I don't think any of these cheap IC testers are going to be of any value. I'd focus on in-circuit trouble shooting and if necessary a simple test setup on a breadboard to test the basic operation of an op-amp for example.

Not true, they definitely can test *some* op amps. On mine it's only a handful, but I keep wondering if newer firmware has added any more.
 

Online David Aurora

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 472
  • Country: au
Re: IC testers, do they work?
« Reply #30 on: August 09, 2023, 12:31:47 am »
Except it's not even a go/no-go as they dont specify what has been tested. A diode test on a multimeter generates some measurements which can be directly applied to the end use (screening for matched forward voltage or checking for excessive reverse leakage are both practical on a multimeter) but a widget that says "diode*"

* probably.

Is not a test. Look at the good link above
For a tester that makes analog measurements on the outputs, have a look at the Tauntek IC tester:

http://tauntek.com/LogICTester-low-cost-logic-chip-tester.htm

It's just a pcb + pre-programmed microcontrollers. You'll have to supply some commonly available parts to build it.

List of supported devices: http://tauntek.com/ctchiplist.pdf

A blog post about it:

https://www.barbouri.com/2021/09/13/building-the-tauntek-logic-ic-tester/
A basic tester that has some limits etc, very different from a device which tells you what it thinks the chip is (identifies).
Again, you're looking at this from an overly ambitious perspective. My analogy with the diode test was precisely that when you're quickly sweeping through with one as a go/no go test you AREN'T using it to match forward voltages and so on. It's just "Is it blatantly fucked? Yes? In the bin it goes". Same with these cheap IC testers.

As a quick example of both the analogy and the actual use case- on one job today a power supply board was shutting down. I had seen the exact same fault on another unit yesterday, so the first thing I did was probe the rectifier diodes I had seen fail before and found a shorted one as expected. I don't remotely care about the precise forward voltage when using the meter for this, all I want to know is if the diodes are basically OK or not. In the case of the IC tester, earlier tonight I had a channel strip from a mixing console up on the bench. On these particular strips I've seen one particular IC kill audio on a few of them, so if one goes down now I'll routinely pull that IC and throw it in the tester. If it fails I can replace it on the spot while I'm at the studio and the channel will likely spring back to life. No need to wire up the channel with a bench supply, set up a scope, etc., if it's as simple as a bad IC I know and it's sorted in a minute.
If you are looking for shorts, why bother with diode test? Just use continuity mode and listen for beep. You framed the discussion around diode test.... which is not comparable to these automated IC "testers". I'll suggest they're much closer to continuity beepers in information content than a diode test mode.

So when you say a "tester" which model/style are you referring to? what information does it provide? is its documentation available online?
There are a range of products out there with wildly different capabilities, the device you refer to may well have much more intelligence than the example the OP is asking about. What passes as "ok" in these cheap testers doesnt always function in real circuits, thats the biggest problem as it provides a false sense of security/validation.

This is the weirdest hill to die on.

First off, about your great advice about how I should use continuity mode for the tests described above- you realise a diode or transistor can fail open as well as short, right? A quick diode test will give you a ballpark idea of a working device and you can move on from there. The fact that you don't get this ought to automatically disqualify you from this conversation because this is real troubleshooting 101 shit.

These devices are NOT analogous to continuity testers. I can put 3 different IC's in them one after another and it will tell me what they are or if they're cooked. Absolutely nobody in their right mind has any expectation that they will pick obscure/intermittent faults that might cause them not to match the data sheet specs, this is just some bizarre bee you have in your bonnet about them. Nobody is using these things to launch rockets, it's just a go/no go tool to speed up troubleshooting. You still need to use your brain and judgement beyond that point if there are doubts about a part.

With regard to your argument that it's not a real world test- welcome to planet earth. Do you think a multimeter is a real world test for resistors/capacitors/diodes/etc? Of course it isn't. It doesn't need to be. It'll tell me if a part reads roughly what it should under simple, low voltage conditions and in most cases that is perfectly fine to get the job done. There are other more advanced tools available when required, and the same goes for IC testing.
Lol, I point out a comparative example/analogy and you nail that to the nth percent rather than stick to the thread topic?

As above, if they are a go/no-go tester then where is the threshold for pass/fail? what do they actually test? You and Fungus seem to be ignoring that while claiming they are perfectly good testers. I say it isn't a tester because there is no documentation or evidence of what has been tested.

I put all that context in my opening post yet you come back and try to argue... something?
Probably more correctly described as a IC identifier rather than a tester, there are no pass/fail criteria or performance measurement as would be associated with testing.
Everyone else in the thread is more realistic and agrees they are some basic tool which is of little confidence. Many posters offered slightly more expensive tools that offer documentation and defined test capability along with increased functionality.

So how about instead of just making noise you actually lay out your explanation of what they test, and why that is useful. Saying they tell you if the item is "working" is some non specific threshold, untrustworthy, particularly these extreme low cost items where the underlying implementation is subject to change (as it was never specified or documented) as long as it still meets the advertised function of telling you which logical pinout the chip is (identification).

Mate... are you serious? There are people here going "I use this effectively for troubleshooting" and your argument is what exactly? That even though it does what we need, we shouldn't use them because you have a weird phobia?

I go back to what I just said about real world testing and thresholds- almost none of the tools we use daily test components under real world conditions. No multimeter out there is going to red flag a noisy plate resistor or excessive leakage on a capacitor, and by the same token these IC testers aren't expected to tell you if the high/low threshold is wonky by a few millivolts in a part. What is it about this you don't understand?
 

Offline Someone

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5155
  • Country: au
    • send complaints here
Re: IC testers, do they work?
« Reply #31 on: August 09, 2023, 12:55:32 am »
I put all that context in my opening post yet you come back and try to argue... something?
Probably more correctly described as a IC identifier rather than a tester, there are no pass/fail criteria or performance measurement as would be associated with testing.
Everyone else in the thread is more realistic and agrees they are some basic tool which is of little confidence. Many posters offered slightly more expensive tools that offer documentation and defined test capability along with increased functionality.

So how about instead of just making noise you actually lay out your explanation of what they test, and why that is useful. Saying they tell you if the item is "working" is some non specific threshold, untrustworthy, particularly these extreme low cost items where the underlying implementation is subject to change (as it was never specified or documented) as long as it still meets the advertised function of telling you which logical pinout the chip is (identification).
Mate... are you serious? There are people here going "I use this effectively for troubleshooting" and your argument is what exactly? That even though it does what we need, we shouldn't use them because you have a weird phobia?

I go back to what I just said about real world testing and thresholds- almost none of the tools we use daily test components under real world conditions. No multimeter out there is going to red flag a noisy plate resistor or excessive leakage on a capacitor, and by the same token these IC testers aren't expected to tell you if the high/low threshold is wonky by a few millivolts in a part. What is it about this you don't understand?
You're the one who keeps quoting my comments with some sort of bizarre disagreement to it. I'm pointing out your disagreements have no substance. So what exactly are these devices testing?

I put it really simply above (quoted it again, and included it in the context with this post just so there can be no misunderstanding) and now you appear to agree with that opening statement, but are still arguing what exactly?
 

Offline alm

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2903
  • Country: 00
Re: IC testers, do they work?
« Reply #32 on: August 09, 2023, 01:12:36 am »
Not true, they definitely can test *some* op amps. On mine it's only a handful, but I keep wondering if newer firmware has added any more.
What is not true? That I don't think they have any value for testing analog ICs? Can you read my mind? I didn't say they couldn't do any test on op amps, just that I don't think it's a very useful test. Never mind other analog ICs like motor drivers or tape head amplifiers.

What do you mean it supports a handful of op amps? I can imagine doing a basic dc test for single and dual op amps, the same you can do with a breadboard, a few resistors and an LED.

But why would it need to support more than a generic single, dual and quad op amp? Is it going to test parameters that are different between a ua741, op07 or tl081? Slew rate? GBW? Offset voltage? Bias current? That would be useful for checking for counterfeit ICs, especially if they could give quantitative results. But I highly doubt the cheap IC testers are going to do those tests.
« Last Edit: August 09, 2023, 01:15:13 am by alm »
 
The following users thanked this post: Someone

Online tautech

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 29810
  • Country: nz
  • Taupaki Technologies Ltd. Siglent Distributor NZ.
    • Taupaki Technologies Ltd.
Re: IC testers, do they work?
« Reply #33 on: August 09, 2023, 01:54:56 am »
No multimeter out there is going to red flag a noisy plate resistor or excessive leakage on a capacitor, and by the same token these IC testers aren't expected to tell you if the high/low threshold is wonky by a few millivolts in a part.
Oh a MC meter can in resistance mode.
Used that many years back to find faulty ignition caps.

Electronic ignitions saw the end to that need.
Avid Rabid Hobbyist.
Some stuff seen @ Siglent HQ cannot be shared.
 

Online David Aurora

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 472
  • Country: au
Re: IC testers, do they work?
« Reply #34 on: August 09, 2023, 02:06:13 am »
I put all that context in my opening post yet you come back and try to argue... something?
Probably more correctly described as a IC identifier rather than a tester, there are no pass/fail criteria or performance measurement as would be associated with testing.
Everyone else in the thread is more realistic and agrees they are some basic tool which is of little confidence. Many posters offered slightly more expensive tools that offer documentation and defined test capability along with increased functionality.

So how about instead of just making noise you actually lay out your explanation of what they test, and why that is useful. Saying they tell you if the item is "working" is some non specific threshold, untrustworthy, particularly these extreme low cost items where the underlying implementation is subject to change (as it was never specified or documented) as long as it still meets the advertised function of telling you which logical pinout the chip is (identification).
Mate... are you serious? There are people here going "I use this effectively for troubleshooting" and your argument is what exactly? That even though it does what we need, we shouldn't use them because you have a weird phobia?

I go back to what I just said about real world testing and thresholds- almost none of the tools we use daily test components under real world conditions. No multimeter out there is going to red flag a noisy plate resistor or excessive leakage on a capacitor, and by the same token these IC testers aren't expected to tell you if the high/low threshold is wonky by a few millivolts in a part. What is it about this you don't understand?
You're the one who keeps quoting my comments with some sort of bizarre disagreement to it. I'm pointing out your disagreements have no substance. So what exactly are these devices testing?

I put it really simply above (quoted it again, and included it in the context with this post just so there can be no misunderstanding) and now you appear to agree with that opening statement, but are still arguing what exactly?

Sorry mate, again- what is your point with all of this? I'm telling you I have one and it is helpful at work. Are you arguing that it isn't helpful? Are you only really arguing about the semantics of what we call these things? Or just that the results aren't as reliable as tests done on the test setups manufacturers use to get their specs? You keep ranting on about the finer details of the tests despite the fact that literally nobody cares about the finer details of the tests, only that we get a ballpark idea of whether or not a part works or not. Again, nobody is using these to test ICs going into space.

Let's try another example and see if this one clicks.

Those cheap 3 terminal multifunction testers that do LCR/transistors/etc. I use one all the time for checking go/no go status, checking pinouts, etc. It doesn't test under real world conditions, I don't know or care what exactly the test method is, and I don't trust or care about the particular measurement numbers it spits out. If those details matter I have dedicated, proper equipment for detailed measurements, but it's very rarely needed in practice. In most cases the 5 second test on the $10 tester tells me what I need to know in the moment and I can get on with the job.
 

Online David Aurora

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 472
  • Country: au
Re: IC testers, do they work?
« Reply #35 on: August 09, 2023, 02:13:04 am »
Not true, they definitely can test *some* op amps. On mine it's only a handful, but I keep wondering if newer firmware has added any more.
What is not true? That I don't think they have any value for testing analog ICs? Can you read my mind? I didn't say they couldn't do any test on op amps, just that I don't think it's a very useful test. Never mind other analog ICs like motor drivers or tape head amplifiers.

What do you mean it supports a handful of op amps? I can imagine doing a basic dc test for single and dual op amps, the same you can do with a breadboard, a few resistors and an LED.

But why would it need to support more than a generic single, dual and quad op amp? Is it going to test parameters that are different between a ua741, op07 or tl081? Slew rate? GBW? Offset voltage? Bias current? That would be useful for checking for counterfeit ICs, especially if they could give quantitative results. But I highly doubt the cheap IC testers are going to do those tests.

You said you didn't think these are of any value for op amps. That's what I was saying was not true, based on the fact that I have identified tonnes of bad op amps with these in seconds flat.

Of course you can test op amps with breadboards and external components, but who the hell has the kind of time on their hands to fuck around like that at work? I don't make a habit of carrying a breadboard kit to a callout.

Nobody is suggesting it can/could/would test for the finer details of things like slew rate etc. I don't know how to drive this point home any harder- these are go/no go testers, not complete measurement suites. They DON'T need to support more than standard op amp packages- if this is in response to my question about supporting a wider variety of op amps, I mean that there are some it recognises and some it doesn't (e.g. both dual op amps, same pinout, but different models). No idea about the inner workings of why that is, hence my curiosity about whether these libraries have been expanded or if the issue is the test method itself. For supported ICs though, it works consistently for me.
 

Offline Someone

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5155
  • Country: au
    • send complaints here
Re: IC testers, do they work?
« Reply #36 on: August 09, 2023, 02:37:40 am »
Not true, they definitely can test *some* op amps. On mine it's only a handful, but I keep wondering if newer firmware has added any more.
What is not true? That I don't think they have any value for testing analog ICs? Can you read my mind? I didn't say they couldn't do any test on op amps, just that I don't think it's a very useful test. Never mind other analog ICs like motor drivers or tape head amplifiers.

What do you mean it supports a handful of op amps? I can imagine doing a basic dc test for single and dual op amps, the same you can do with a breadboard, a few resistors and an LED.

But why would it need to support more than a generic single, dual and quad op amp? Is it going to test parameters that are different between a ua741, op07 or tl081? Slew rate? GBW? Offset voltage? Bias current? That would be useful for checking for counterfeit ICs, especially if they could give quantitative results. But I highly doubt the cheap IC testers are going to do those tests.
You said you didn't think these are of any value for op amps. That's what I was saying was not true, based on the fact that I have identified tonnes of bad op amps with these in seconds flat.
You believe that, and we don't. It's some arbitrary distinction of what you want as the threshold for "works" and what we want as the threshold. Rather than saying we're wrong (because we're not) why not explain your reasons rather than just attacking what we say as if its incorrect (which you cannot seem to build an argument to support).

Real simple, if you think it is a good test, what is it testing?
If you don't know what it is testing I say it is a bad test, and given it returns only a binary result barely able to be called a test.

Those cheap 3 terminal multifunction testers that do LCR/transistors/etc. I use one all the time for checking go/no go status, checking pinouts, etc. It doesn't test under real world conditions, I don't know or care what exactly the test method is, and I don't trust or care about the particular measurement numbers it spits out. If those details matter I have dedicated, proper equipment for detailed measurements, but it's very rarely needed in practice. In most cases the 5 second test on the $10 tester tells me what I need to know in the moment and I can get on with the job.
I feel the 3 terminal testers are vastly more useful and powerful as (the ones I have used) return some parameters that the user can make judgements from and allow insight into what the pass/fail criteria is. Just as some IC testers do, but not the one the OP asked about, which I say is generally a waste of time as you have no idea what it is claiming.
 

Offline DaleWentz

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 8
  • Country: us
Re: IC testers, do they work?
« Reply #37 on: August 09, 2023, 03:42:14 am »
I have built the Tauntek tester and it works great for logic chips, 7400, 4000 cmos etc. I would replace it if something happened to it, as its useful to me in my lab. That being said, I enjoy working on 70 and 80is test equipment that used those types of chips. For OpAmps I have scratch built a few versions of the testers offered by night fire electronics, and they are good go/no go testers. All of this just speeds up testing of failed chips, none of them stress test the parts to their limits, that is just not what they are designed to do.
 
The following users thanked this post: David Aurora

Online David Aurora

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 472
  • Country: au
Re: IC testers, do they work?
« Reply #38 on: August 09, 2023, 03:49:30 am »
Not true, they definitely can test *some* op amps. On mine it's only a handful, but I keep wondering if newer firmware has added any more.
What is not true? That I don't think they have any value for testing analog ICs? Can you read my mind? I didn't say they couldn't do any test on op amps, just that I don't think it's a very useful test. Never mind other analog ICs like motor drivers or tape head amplifiers.

What do you mean it supports a handful of op amps? I can imagine doing a basic dc test for single and dual op amps, the same you can do with a breadboard, a few resistors and an LED.

But why would it need to support more than a generic single, dual and quad op amp? Is it going to test parameters that are different between a ua741, op07 or tl081? Slew rate? GBW? Offset voltage? Bias current? That would be useful for checking for counterfeit ICs, especially if they could give quantitative results. But I highly doubt the cheap IC testers are going to do those tests.
You said you didn't think these are of any value for op amps. That's what I was saying was not true, based on the fact that I have identified tonnes of bad op amps with these in seconds flat.
You believe that, and we don't. It's some arbitrary distinction of what you want as the threshold for "works" and what we want as the threshold. Rather than saying we're wrong (because we're not) why not explain your reasons rather than just attacking what we say as if its incorrect (which you cannot seem to build an argument to support).

Real simple, if you think it is a good test, what is it testing?
If you don't know what it is testing I say it is a bad test, and given it returns only a binary result barely able to be called a test.

Those cheap 3 terminal multifunction testers that do LCR/transistors/etc. I use one all the time for checking go/no go status, checking pinouts, etc. It doesn't test under real world conditions, I don't know or care what exactly the test method is, and I don't trust or care about the particular measurement numbers it spits out. If those details matter I have dedicated, proper equipment for detailed measurements, but it's very rarely needed in practice. In most cases the 5 second test on the $10 tester tells me what I need to know in the moment and I can get on with the job.
I feel the 3 terminal testers are vastly more useful and powerful as (the ones I have used) return some parameters that the user can make judgements from and allow insight into what the pass/fail criteria is. Just as some IC testers do, but not the one the OP asked about, which I say is generally a waste of time as you have no idea what it is claiming.


Huuuuuge armchair expert vibes going on here.

I don't care if you "believe" these aren't of any value for troubleshooting, given that I make a living troubleshooting electronics and these have found a place in my toolkit.

You keep looping back to the testing parameters over and over again, despite the fact that absolutely nobody is using these for characterising devices. I can't tell if you're illiterate, inexperienced or just trolling here.

Have you actually used one of these and had issues with results, or is your issue here all in your head?
 

Offline Someone

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5155
  • Country: au
    • send complaints here
Re: IC testers, do they work?
« Reply #39 on: August 09, 2023, 04:31:11 am »
Not true, they definitely can test *some* op amps. On mine it's only a handful, but I keep wondering if newer firmware has added any more.
What is not true? That I don't think they have any value for testing analog ICs? Can you read my mind? I didn't say they couldn't do any test on op amps, just that I don't think it's a very useful test. Never mind other analog ICs like motor drivers or tape head amplifiers.

What do you mean it supports a handful of op amps? I can imagine doing a basic dc test for single and dual op amps, the same you can do with a breadboard, a few resistors and an LED.

But why would it need to support more than a generic single, dual and quad op amp? Is it going to test parameters that are different between a ua741, op07 or tl081? Slew rate? GBW? Offset voltage? Bias current? That would be useful for checking for counterfeit ICs, especially if they could give quantitative results. But I highly doubt the cheap IC testers are going to do those tests.
You said you didn't think these are of any value for op amps. That's what I was saying was not true, based on the fact that I have identified tonnes of bad op amps with these in seconds flat.
You believe that, and we don't. It's some arbitrary distinction of what you want as the threshold for "works" and what we want as the threshold. Rather than saying we're wrong (because we're not) why not explain your reasons rather than just attacking what we say as if its incorrect (which you cannot seem to build an argument to support).

Real simple, if you think it is a good test, what is it testing?
If you don't know what it is testing I say it is a bad test, and given it returns only a binary result barely able to be called a test.

Those cheap 3 terminal multifunction testers that do LCR/transistors/etc. I use one all the time for checking go/no go status, checking pinouts, etc. It doesn't test under real world conditions, I don't know or care what exactly the test method is, and I don't trust or care about the particular measurement numbers it spits out. If those details matter I have dedicated, proper equipment for detailed measurements, but it's very rarely needed in practice. In most cases the 5 second test on the $10 tester tells me what I need to know in the moment and I can get on with the job.
I feel the 3 terminal testers are vastly more useful and powerful as (the ones I have used) return some parameters that the user can make judgements from and allow insight into what the pass/fail criteria is. Just as some IC testers do, but not the one the OP asked about, which I say is generally a waste of time as you have no idea what it is claiming.
Huuuuuge armchair expert vibes going on here.

I don't care if you "believe" these aren't of any value for troubleshooting, given that I make a living troubleshooting electronics and these have found a place in my toolkit.

You keep looping back to the testing parameters over and over again, despite the fact that absolutely nobody is using these for characterising devices. I can't tell if you're illiterate, inexperienced or just trolling here.

Have you actually used one of these and had issues with results, or is your issue here all in your head?
You say you trust it but cannot say what it does? Great, leave it at that. Why keep coming back in combative argumentative mode?

If a product can not tell me what it is doing (and has no specifications) I treat that as a toy and value it accordingly, that is what I keep communicating and you keep coming back with more disagreement. You value it differently, both points of view have been put forward and I'm not arguing against your opinion of that. I'm pointing out your arguments against my posts are baseless, and continue to be so.

If I want to know if a part is working I'll test it in representative conditions, not some undefined mode. Have I debugged and fixed equipment in the field (away from a workshop or lab) ? sure have, and would not place any value in the cheap toy that the OP was asking about. You see that value judgement differently which is ok, but you seem to think it is ok to keep coming back and arguing that I cannot have such an opinion (and failing to explain or back up your claims that others opinions are wrong, just because you disagree does not mean it is wrong).

From my point of view you do care (keep coming back and choosing to quote specific comments + reply to them), and are unable to engage in basic discussion (as you simply dismiss other viewpoints without any basis and ignore direct questions).
 

Online David Aurora

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 472
  • Country: au
Re: IC testers, do they work?
« Reply #40 on: August 09, 2023, 05:48:33 am »
Not true, they definitely can test *some* op amps. On mine it's only a handful, but I keep wondering if newer firmware has added any more.
What is not true? That I don't think they have any value for testing analog ICs? Can you read my mind? I didn't say they couldn't do any test on op amps, just that I don't think it's a very useful test. Never mind other analog ICs like motor drivers or tape head amplifiers.

What do you mean it supports a handful of op amps? I can imagine doing a basic dc test for single and dual op amps, the same you can do with a breadboard, a few resistors and an LED.

But why would it need to support more than a generic single, dual and quad op amp? Is it going to test parameters that are different between a ua741, op07 or tl081? Slew rate? GBW? Offset voltage? Bias current? That would be useful for checking for counterfeit ICs, especially if they could give quantitative results. But I highly doubt the cheap IC testers are going to do those tests.
You said you didn't think these are of any value for op amps. That's what I was saying was not true, based on the fact that I have identified tonnes of bad op amps with these in seconds flat.
You believe that, and we don't. It's some arbitrary distinction of what you want as the threshold for "works" and what we want as the threshold. Rather than saying we're wrong (because we're not) why not explain your reasons rather than just attacking what we say as if its incorrect (which you cannot seem to build an argument to support).

Real simple, if you think it is a good test, what is it testing?
If you don't know what it is testing I say it is a bad test, and given it returns only a binary result barely able to be called a test.

Those cheap 3 terminal multifunction testers that do LCR/transistors/etc. I use one all the time for checking go/no go status, checking pinouts, etc. It doesn't test under real world conditions, I don't know or care what exactly the test method is, and I don't trust or care about the particular measurement numbers it spits out. If those details matter I have dedicated, proper equipment for detailed measurements, but it's very rarely needed in practice. In most cases the 5 second test on the $10 tester tells me what I need to know in the moment and I can get on with the job.
I feel the 3 terminal testers are vastly more useful and powerful as (the ones I have used) return some parameters that the user can make judgements from and allow insight into what the pass/fail criteria is. Just as some IC testers do, but not the one the OP asked about, which I say is generally a waste of time as you have no idea what it is claiming.
Huuuuuge armchair expert vibes going on here.

I don't care if you "believe" these aren't of any value for troubleshooting, given that I make a living troubleshooting electronics and these have found a place in my toolkit.

You keep looping back to the testing parameters over and over again, despite the fact that absolutely nobody is using these for characterising devices. I can't tell if you're illiterate, inexperienced or just trolling here.

Have you actually used one of these and had issues with results, or is your issue here all in your head?
You say you trust it but cannot say what it does? Great, leave it at that. Why keep coming back in combative argumentative mode?

If a product can not tell me what it is doing (and has no specifications) I treat that as a toy and value it accordingly, that is what I keep communicating and you keep coming back with more disagreement. You value it differently, both points of view have been put forward and I'm not arguing against your opinion of that. I'm pointing out your arguments against my posts are baseless, and continue to be so.

If I want to know if a part is working I'll test it in representative conditions, not some undefined mode. Have I debugged and fixed equipment in the field (away from a workshop or lab) ? sure have, and would not place any value in the cheap toy that the OP was asking about. You see that value judgement differently which is ok, but you seem to think it is ok to keep coming back and arguing that I cannot have such an opinion (and failing to explain or back up your claims that others opinions are wrong, just because you disagree does not mean it is wrong).

From my point of view you do care (keep coming back and choosing to quote specific comments + reply to them), and are unable to engage in basic discussion (as you simply dismiss other viewpoints without any basis and ignore direct questions).

Issue is all in your head, got it.
 

Offline Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 17518
  • Country: 00
Re: IC testers, do they work?
« Reply #41 on: August 09, 2023, 08:01:40 am »
You believe that, and we don't.

Who's "we"?
 

Offline Fungus

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 17518
  • Country: 00
Re: IC testers, do they work?
« Reply #42 on: August 09, 2023, 08:05:31 am »
If a product can not tell me what it is doing (and has no specifications) I treat that as a toy

The source code is available. Feel free to download it and find out for yourself.

Do you really think that nobody who's coding this would make an effort to (eg.) check all combinations of inputs to a 7400-series chip to make sure it outputs correct values?
 

Offline Someone

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 5155
  • Country: au
    • send complaints here
Re: IC testers, do they work?
« Reply #43 on: August 09, 2023, 09:42:01 am »
If a product can not tell me what it is doing (and has no specifications) I treat that as a toy
The source code is available. Feel free to download it and find out for yourself.
Where?
Or are you confusing the well documented and more complex examples linked to in this thread as suggestions, vs the toy the OP opened with questions about?

Do you really think that nobody who's coding this would make an effort to (eg.) check all combinations of inputs to a 7400-series chip to make sure it outputs correct values?
Where has anyone suggested that? As I keep saying, testing logic combinations is pretty much the only thing those low cost "testers" do. Doesnt meet the dictionary definition of a test, and is better described as identifying.
 

Offline Doctorandus_P

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4004
  • Country: nl
Re: IC testers, do they work?
« Reply #44 on: August 09, 2023, 02:26:25 pm »
On a sidenote.

If you are interested in IC testing, look into an "IV tester" (as in current and voltage).
These things can detect "fake" and rebranded IC's even if they are "funcional", and can probably also detect ESD damage even if the IC is still "mostly working", but "just out of spec".
 
The following users thanked this post: Someone


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf