Products > Test Equipment
is it true, oscilloscope must reach at least 4x observed freq?
oxy:
Hi,
some people say, if I wanna observe 100MHz, I must use an oscilloscope that reaches at least 400MHz.
Is it true?
bdunham7:
The first step in understanding this question is to accurately explain what you mean by "100MHz".
coppice:
--- Quote from: oxy on September 12, 2022, 04:43:14 pm ---Hi,
some people say, if I wanna observe 100MHz, I must use an oscilloscope that reaches at least 400MHz.
Is it true?
--- End quote ---
Are you talking about bandwidth (100MHz) versus the sampling rate needed to achieve that in a digitising oscilloscope? By the Shannon/Nyquist/Whittaker/Kotelnikov sampling theorem you will need a sampling rate more than 2 times the bandwidth. So, by theory you need a sampling rate of 200Msps. In practice you need something a bit higher than that. Many scopes use something like 2.5x, while others use something considerably higher, like 4x or 5x.
Fungus:
--- Quote from: oxy on September 12, 2022, 04:43:14 pm ---some people say, if I wanna observe 100MHz, I must use an oscilloscope that reaches at least 400MHz.
Is it true?
--- End quote ---
No. The minimum needed would be 250Mhz to observe a 100Mhz sine wave.
That's why you see (eg.) 100Mhz, 4-channel 'scopes with 1GHz sample rate.
bdunham7:
--- Quote from: Fungus on September 12, 2022, 04:55:21 pm ---No. The minimum needed would be 250Mhz to observe a 100Mhz sine wave.
That's why you see (eg.) 100Mhz, 4-channel 'scopes with 1GHz sample rate.
--- End quote ---
MSa/s and MHz are two different things and the way you put it is very confusing at best. The OP didn't actually specify a DSO and from the nature of his question, I don't think he's referring to sample rates.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version