| Products > Test Equipment |
| Is the RiGOL DS1054Z still Dave's choice for under $500? |
| << < (11/16) > >> |
| Fungus:
--- Quote from: JenniferG on November 26, 2022, 06:34:48 am ---Thanks everyone for all the replies. Someone on another forum said they recently purchased the Rigol HDO1074. It's a 12 bit ADC and only $699? I imagine it can be hacked eventually as well. --- End quote --- It's already been hacked. |
| JeremyC:
--- Quote from: JenniferG on November 26, 2022, 06:34:48 am ---Thanks everyone for all the replies. Someone on another forum said they recently purchased the Rigol HDO1074. It's a 12 bit ADC and only $699? I imagine it can be hacked eventually as well. If I got the HD01074 instead of the Sigilents mentioned above, what would I be lacking ? How does the UI and display performance compare between the them? Seems like 12 bit ADC is a huge upgrade. SIXTEEN times the resolution! --- End quote --- I believe the HDO1074 is $999, the 1072 (2 channel) is $699. Yes, you will get 12bit, but you should ask yourself if you really need it. The Rigol 12bit series doesn’t have Bode plot as option (it maybe not important for some people, but it’s for me). |
| JeremyC:
--- Quote from: JenniferG on November 26, 2022, 06:34:48 am ---If I got the HD01074 instead of the Sigilents mentioned above, what would I be lacking ? How does the UI and display performance compare between the them? Seems like 12 bit ADC is a huge upgrade. SIXTEEN times the resolution! --- End quote --- If you want compare "apples to apples" then you should compare SDS2000X Plus series with SDS2000X HD. In Rigol line the closest would be the HDO4000 series and not the HDO1000... |
| 2N3055:
--- Quote from: JenniferG on November 26, 2022, 06:34:48 am ---Thanks everyone for all the replies. Someone on another forum said they recently purchased the Rigol HDO1074. It's a 12 bit ADC and only $699? I imagine it can be hacked eventually as well. If I got the HD01074 instead of the Sigilents mentioned above, what would I be lacking ? How does the UI and display performance compare between the them? Seems like 12 bit ADC is a huge upgrade. SIXTEEN times the resolution! --- End quote --- Hi, you should do more research than just wikipedia. Rigol and Siglent have web sites with detailed documentation. They both have USA/EU HQ and several well respected distributors that also give customer support. I would at least download datasheets and compare feature sets to see if scopes have functions you need. Comparison between SDS2000X+ and DHO1000 is not really one to one. DHO1000 has 12bit ADC, 4 analog ch. Also it also goes to only 200MHz. SDS2000X+ goes to 500 Mhz, has 4 analog and 16 digital channels (20 total signals). DHO1000 series is also really new (just released) and you have to be prepared to deal with early software releases and wait for Rigol to fix all the early release bugs. More resolution is nice. OTOH most people out there use 8bit scopes. It really depends what you plan to do with it. If nothing is know of application, then max number of channels and biggest BW is prefered, because there is nothing you can do if you don't have enough of those for the application. If you need to look at 432MHz signal, 200MHz scope wont do regardless of resolution. If you want to debug 12 digital signals, you need that many channels. If you need to measure very low level signals with absolute best resolution, you need low noise high resolution scope. |
| JenniferG:
--- Quote from: 2N3055 on November 26, 2022, 10:34:22 am --- --- Quote from: JenniferG on November 26, 2022, 06:34:48 am ---Thanks everyone for all the replies. Someone on another forum said they recently purchased the Rigol HDO1074. It's a 12 bit ADC and only $699? I imagine it can be hacked eventually as well. If I got the HD01074 instead of the Sigilents mentioned above, what would I be lacking ? How does the UI and display performance compare between the them? Seems like 12 bit ADC is a huge upgrade. SIXTEEN times the resolution! --- End quote --- Hi, you should do more research than just wikipedia. --- End quote --- I never said I was relying on Wikipedia. I just said I found it odd Siglent doesn't even have an entry nor does Rigol have more than 2 paragraphs. Thanks for all that great info though about the scopes. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |