Author Topic: Keithley 2182A Digital Nanovoltmeter  (Read 5525 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Terabyte2007Topic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 527
  • Country: us
  • It is purpose that created us... That defines us..
Keithley 2182A Digital Nanovoltmeter
« on: October 21, 2013, 03:09:25 pm »
Does anyone have any experience with the Keithley 2182A Digital Nanovoltmeter? Is it worth the 3K price tag?

http://www.keithley.com/products/dcac/sensitive/lowvoltage/?mn=2182A

Eric Haney, MCSE, EE, DMC-D
Electronics Designer, Prototype Builder
 

Offline robrenz

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 3035
  • Country: us
  • Real Machinist, Wannabe EE
Re: Keithley 2182A Digital Nanovoltmeter
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2013, 04:02:58 pm »
The Agilent 34420A nanovoltmeter/micro ohmmeter has a built in current source so it can do resistance without a separate current source but it costs a little more.  I don't know which one has better specs for voltage.

Offline branadic

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2390
  • Country: de
  • Sounds like noise
Re: Keithley 2182A Digital Nanovoltmeter
« Reply #2 on: May 10, 2018, 09:40:59 pm »
Even though this thread is very old, yes it seems to be worth it's price. We have one at work and I have checked relative zero over 2h using the internal RS232 interface with a selfmade short. Both filters analog and digital are active, NPLC is 5. I have never seen Attovolt coming through an USB interface before.  ;D

-branadic-
« Last Edit: May 23, 2018, 07:44:23 am by branadic »
Computers exist to solve problems that we wouldn't have without them. AI exists to answer questions, we wouldn't ask without it.
 
The following users thanked this post: kj7e

Offline Alex Nikitin

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1177
  • Country: gb
  • Femtoampnut and Tapehead.
    • A.N.T. Audio
Re: Keithley 2182A Digital Nanovoltmeter
« Reply #3 on: May 11, 2018, 12:32:28 pm »
Even though this thread is very old, yes it seems to be worth it's price. We have one at work and I have checked relative zero over 2h using the internal RS232 interface with a selfmade short. Both filters analog and digital are active, NPLC is 5. I have never seen Attovolt coming through an USB interface before.  ;D

-branadic-

How does it compare with the K181?

Cheers

Alex
 

Offline Terabyte2007Topic starter

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 527
  • Country: us
  • It is purpose that created us... That defines us..
Re: Keithley 2182A Digital Nanovoltmeter
« Reply #4 on: May 11, 2018, 12:54:16 pm »
Even though this thread is very old, yes it seems to be worth it's price. We have one at work and I have checked relative zero over 2h using the internal RS232 interface with a selfmade short. Both filters analog and digital are active, NPLC is 5. I have never seen Attovolt coming through an USB interface before.  ;D

-branadic-

Nice, I am afraid my lab may have too much background interference to accurately measure that low. I would need to build a shielded enclosure. I have a high resistance meter that will measure well into the TerraOhms but I have to use it with my DUT in a grounded aluminum box. Thanks for the info!
« Last Edit: May 11, 2018, 12:56:13 pm by Terabyte2007 »
Eric Haney, MCSE, EE, DMC-D
Electronics Designer, Prototype Builder
 

Offline branadic

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2390
  • Country: de
  • Sounds like noise
Re: Keithley 2182A Digital Nanovoltmeter
« Reply #5 on: May 11, 2018, 02:42:13 pm »
Quote
How does it compare with the K181?

Can't tell you that, as I never recorded 2h data with Keithley 181, but you can get a raw idea of Keithley 181 performance in this video:

https://xdevs.com/cm/RandomPics/K181_Cable/20171009_194206.mp4

-branadic-
Computers exist to solve problems that we wouldn't have without them. AI exists to answer questions, we wouldn't ask without it.
 
The following users thanked this post: kj7e

Offline kj7e

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 911
  • Country: us
  • Damon Stewart
Re: Keithley 2182A Digital Nanovoltmeter
« Reply #6 on: May 11, 2018, 03:17:03 pm »
Quote
How does it compare with the K181?

Can't tell you that, as I never recorded 2h data with Keithley 181, but you can get a raw idea of Keithley 181 performance in this video:

https://xdevs.com/cm/RandomPics/K181_Cable/20171009_194206.mp4

-branadic-

Looks like a CalMachine video.  Damn, now I want one and I don't even have a use for it.
 

Offline branadic

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2390
  • Country: de
  • Sounds like noise
Re: Keithley 2182A Digital Nanovoltmeter
« Reply #7 on: May 12, 2018, 08:49:34 am »
It is a CalMachine video ;)
This piece of kit is really nice, but I'm lacking applications for it beside monitoring the difference between voltage references. Thus, I sold my Keithley 181 and if needed can use the 2182A we have at work.
The nice thing about 2182A is that it has 2 channels, even though the second channel has only 10nV resolution and a maximum input voltage of 12V. Good enough for ratiometric measurements like characterizing voltage dividers without necessarily rearranging probe tips.

-branadic-
Computers exist to solve problems that we wouldn't have without them. AI exists to answer questions, we wouldn't ask without it.
 

Offline TiN

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4543
  • Country: ua
    • xDevs.com
Re: Keithley 2182A Digital Nanovoltmeter
« Reply #8 on: May 13, 2018, 03:40:29 am »
I can part with 182M as I got 2182A as repair project already  :)
YouTube | Metrology IRC Chat room | Let's share T&M documentation? Upload! No upload limits for firmwares, photos, files.
 
The following users thanked this post: kj7e

Offline kj7e

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 911
  • Country: us
  • Damon Stewart
Re: Keithley 2182A Digital Nanovoltmeter
« Reply #9 on: May 13, 2018, 03:56:32 am »
I can part with 182M as I got 2182A as repair project already  :)

You have the fancy connector for it?  The 182 may be more than I'm willing to spend.
 

Offline TiN

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4543
  • Country: ua
    • xDevs.com
Re: Keithley 2182A Digital Nanovoltmeter
« Reply #10 on: May 13, 2018, 04:02:31 am »
Yup, complete kit. I even have Keithley 1488 short.
I recalibrated it a week ago, using 5700A/3458A.
YouTube | Metrology IRC Chat room | Let's share T&M documentation? Upload! No upload limits for firmwares, photos, files.
 

Offline kj7e

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 911
  • Country: us
  • Damon Stewart
Re: Keithley 2182A Digital Nanovoltmeter
« Reply #11 on: May 13, 2018, 04:30:17 am »
Send me a PM with the info.
 

Offline Alex Nikitin

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1177
  • Country: gb
  • Femtoampnut and Tapehead.
    • A.N.T. Audio
Re: Keithley 2182A Digital Nanovoltmeter
« Reply #12 on: May 14, 2018, 08:56:25 am »
Quote
How does it compare with the K181?

Can't tell you that, as I never recorded 2h data with Keithley 181, but you can get a raw idea of Keithley 181 performance in this video:

https://xdevs.com/cm/RandomPics/K181_Cable/20171009_194206.mp4

-branadic-

Here is the result from my Keithley 181 over 5.5 hours - offset compensated, with +/-95nV input voltage applied for some of the time. Recorded by the K34465A at 1sec intervals from the analogue output, vertical scale is in microvolts.

Cheers

Alex

 

Offline branadic

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 2390
  • Country: de
  • Sounds like noise
Re: Keithley 2182A Digital Nanovoltmeter
« Reply #13 on: May 16, 2018, 06:58:41 pm »
Quote
Here is the result from my Keithley 181 over 5.5 hours - offset compensated, with +/-95nV input voltage applied for some of the time. Recorded by the K34465A at 1sec intervals from the analogue output, vertical scale is in microvolts.

Cheers

Alex

Thanks for the plot. Is there any difference in noise using digital data via GPIB or analog output plus a voltmeter? How did you manage to generate those 95nV?

-branadic-
Computers exist to solve problems that we wouldn't have without them. AI exists to answer questions, we wouldn't ask without it.
 

Offline Alex Nikitin

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1177
  • Country: gb
  • Femtoampnut and Tapehead.
    • A.N.T. Audio
Re: Keithley 2182A Digital Nanovoltmeter
« Reply #14 on: May 16, 2018, 09:13:33 pm »

Thanks for the plot. Is there any difference in noise using digital data via GPIB or analog output plus a voltmeter? How did you manage to generate those 95nV?


1) No difference. The (isolated) analogue output is generated by a 12-bit DAC, either from the top or from the bottom 3.5 digits. Each step is 1mV and clearly visible on a good meter, like the 34465A on 100mV or 1V range, so 1mV on the output from the bottom end = 1LSB = 1nV input on 2mV range.

2) From a divider - 21M/10R (just an accidental value) mounted in the plug and connected to 200mV output from the Keithley 617.  10 ohm in the divider is probably adding to the noise/drift as it is a simple 1% metal film resistor. I will re-build it with better resistors - probably a metal foil 10R, and a good quality 10M for 1/1000000 divider.

Cheers

Alex
« Last Edit: May 16, 2018, 09:15:14 pm by Alex Nikitin »
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline maxwell3e10

  • Frequent Contributor
  • **
  • Posts: 869
  • Country: us
Re: Keithley 2182A Digital Nanovoltmeter
« Reply #15 on: May 17, 2018, 01:25:45 am »
Cool data. I happen to be playing with the HP 34420A and will record similar data. Let's have a shootout of nanovoltmeters.
 
The following users thanked this post: egonotto

Offline TiN

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 4543
  • Country: ua
    • xDevs.com
Nanovolts
« Reply #16 on: May 17, 2018, 04:55:07 am »
Mod then should rename the thread then :)
YouTube | Metrology IRC Chat room | Let's share T&M documentation? Upload! No upload limits for firmwares, photos, files.
 

Offline Alex Nikitin

  • Super Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 1177
  • Country: gb
  • Femtoampnut and Tapehead.
    • A.N.T. Audio
Re: Nanovolts
« Reply #17 on: May 17, 2018, 08:51:18 am »
Mod then should rename the thread then :)

Perhaps it would be better to start a separate thread.

Cheers

Alex
« Last Edit: May 17, 2018, 11:40:26 am by Alex Nikitin »
 


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf