| Products > Test Equipment |
| Keysight DSOS204A waveform update rate |
| << < (7/8) > >> |
| KrzysztofB:
Whole thread started with low waveforms/second and video is related to that. But yes, what worries me more than low w/s is that, it can acquire a lot of data, but I can't find any good way of searching defects in those other clicking Play on segmented view and staring at playback :-DD |
| Bud:
--- Quote ---Mask testing / Limit testing works in other modes not in segmented. --- End quote --- This is because in real time mode they are real time processed in hardware. But you are looking for post-processing in software. I dont think you can do it on the scope, but may be possible in GPIB/SCPI connected software. |
| Someone:
--- Quote from: Bud on June 12, 2022, 06:43:06 pm --- --- Quote from: KrzysztofB on June 12, 2022, 09:04:31 am ---Mask testing / Limit testing works in other modes not in segmented. --- End quote --- This is because in real time mode they are real time processed in hardware. But you are looking for post-processing in software. I dont think you can do it on the scope, but may be possible in GPIB/SCPI connected software. --- End quote --- On the Agilent/Keysight 9000/9000H/S platform? pretty sure mask testing is software based processing on those (otherwise they would have listed it in the hardware accelerated features). The OP purchased a deep memory offline analysis scope, without realising its drawbacks. Tek, Lercroy, also offered comparable models. They are fundamentally different in their capabilities and were never great at realtime captures. Its only recently that scopes started to blur that boundary with deep memory, GHz bandwidth, and fast waveform rates: Keysight EXR/MXR, R&S RTO/RTP, Tek 5/6 series, Siglent 6000, Rigol 8000/70000. |
| KrzysztofB:
--- Quote from: Someone on June 13, 2022, 01:03:34 am ---On the Agilent/Keysight 9000/9000H/S platform? pretty sure mask testing is software based processing on those --- End quote --- Agree. If it was hardware based, wouldn't be that slow. --- Quote ---The OP purchased a deep memory offline analysis scope, without realising its drawbacks. Tek, Lercroy, also offered comparable models. They are fundamentally different in their capabilities and were never great at realtime captures. --- End quote --- That is true, different way to do stuff. However if we agree that process is: First grab then analize, my question is, how to analize? Because as I mentioned I already found out how to capture the data, and to get a lot of them and not miss much it has to land in segmented memory. Question is how to Search through it? Noone using Infiniium here to give me a hint? |
| Someone:
--- Quote from: KrzysztofB on June 13, 2022, 05:06:44 am ---However if we agree that process is: First grab then analize, my question is, how to analize? Because as I mentioned I already found out how to capture the data, and to get a lot of them and not miss much it has to land in segmented memory. Question is how to Search through it? --- End quote --- Segmented data is the wrong way to start with. InfiniiScan (a name that is a catch-all for several features including software triggers, and ) includes the tools to hunt through long captures and find additions things, including more complex details than triggers. Its right there in the marketing copy: "Manually inspecting waveforms is impractical, as 1 M point of memory represents 10,000 screens of waveforms. [with InfiniiScan] Scope scans the waveform so you don’t have to, and no programming is required" Pull up the help/documentation loaded on the scope if you don't understand it. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |