Products > Test Equipment

LCR meter opinion

<< < (7/21) > >>

rsjsouza:
Indeed. Does it show in its manual a tremendously low accuracy specification for D at 100kHz? (The problem at hand in the other thread, as I understand it)

If so, then it is indeed operating as specified. Otherwise, look elsewhere if you need this frequency range.

indman:

--- Quote from: rsjsouza on January 18, 2022, 10:41:04 am ---Indeed. Does it show in its manual a tremendously low accuracy specification for D at 100kHz?

--- End quote ---
Where in the manual does it say that the D parameter and the ESR have a really low accuracy at 100kHz? Finally, can someone explain to me, why MS5308 shows adequate results at 100kHz and is built on the same component base as DE-5000? Does it have a different D and ESR parameter accuracy claimed at 100kHz in manual?

rsjsouza:
I don't know; I don't have this meter.

It was a question to Martin since he is so sure the device is operating under its specs...

Martin72:
Hi,
Sorry guys,
I was completely convinced that the entire µF range of the table in the specifications at 100Khz included a dash, which means out of specs.
Then looked at the manual... ;)
But.... there´s something strange in this table... :P
I think the few entries in the 100khz for µF range are faulty.
Will take my DE5000 to work and test the 100khz against our two calibrated LCRs.

Martin

rsjsouza:
Interesting to see some of the blanked regions of the spec sheet, thanks for sharing.

Despite the Reed R5001 uses the same chipset, it has a more complete spec sheet.



However it does not come without flaws as well. I just recalled an ancient thread that discuss these flaws and proposed solutions. It also links to other threads with rebrands of the same model. 
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/reviews/reed-r5001-lcr-meter/

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod