Products > Test Equipment
LCR meter opinion
rsjsouza:
Indeed. Does it show in its manual a tremendously low accuracy specification for D at 100kHz? (The problem at hand in the other thread, as I understand it)
If so, then it is indeed operating as specified. Otherwise, look elsewhere if you need this frequency range.
indman:
--- Quote from: rsjsouza on January 18, 2022, 10:41:04 am ---Indeed. Does it show in its manual a tremendously low accuracy specification for D at 100kHz?
--- End quote ---
Where in the manual does it say that the D parameter and the ESR have a really low accuracy at 100kHz? Finally, can someone explain to me, why MS5308 shows adequate results at 100kHz and is built on the same component base as DE-5000? Does it have a different D and ESR parameter accuracy claimed at 100kHz in manual?
rsjsouza:
I don't know; I don't have this meter.
It was a question to Martin since he is so sure the device is operating under its specs...
Martin72:
Hi,
Sorry guys,
I was completely convinced that the entire µF range of the table in the specifications at 100Khz included a dash, which means out of specs.
Then looked at the manual... ;)
But.... there´s something strange in this table... :P
I think the few entries in the 100khz for µF range are faulty.
Will take my DE5000 to work and test the 100khz against our two calibrated LCRs.
Martin
rsjsouza:
Interesting to see some of the blanked regions of the spec sheet, thanks for sharing.
Despite the Reed R5001 uses the same chipset, it has a more complete spec sheet.
However it does not come without flaws as well. I just recalled an ancient thread that discuss these flaws and proposed solutions. It also links to other threads with rebrands of the same model.
https://www.eevblog.com/forum/reviews/reed-r5001-lcr-meter/
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version