| Products > Test Equipment |
| Micsig Tablet Oscilloscope tBook mini TO1104 review (100Mhz 4 channel 'scope) |
| << < (14/37) > >> |
| fishandchips:
--- Quote from: TK on July 01, 2017, 03:59:36 pm --- --- Quote from: fishandchips on July 01, 2017, 02:59:36 pm --- --- Quote from: TK on July 01, 2017, 02:50:38 pm ---No, it did not include the BNC adapters. You cannot have the best of everything in one single product. --- End quote --- What suggestion do you have to avoid the issue mentioned in Dave's video cited in that thread? --- End quote --- What issue and what thread? Can you include a link? --- End quote --- Reply #11 in the thread: https://www.eevblog.com/forum/testgear/cable-to-connect-function-generator-to-oscilloscope/ Expert forum users mentioned that for the function generator I am using, I should not worry about that issue. |
| fishandchips:
Any of you bought the Micsig Oscilloscope Bag? How is it? |
| exe:
--- Quote from: fishandchips on July 02, 2017, 12:55:32 pm ---Any of you bought the Micsig Oscilloscope Bag? How is it? --- End quote --- I ordered with a bag. But it's yet to arrive... |
| lukier:
--- Quote from: fishandchips on July 02, 2017, 12:55:32 pm ---Any of you bought the Micsig Oscilloscope Bag? How is it? --- End quote --- Mine TO1074 just arrived today. I don't have time now to check all the functions to the fullest, but after first quick tests I must say I'm quite impressed. It is really compact, the UI is much more responsive than DS1054Z. It has all the necessities of a basic scope - deep memory, measurements, cursors, variety of triggers, serial decoders, simple math & FFT. Maybe others don't consider it so, because of a different form factor but I think that TO1074 is a serious competition for DS1054Z - for slightly higher price it has more features (500uV/div, WiFi & HDMI, portability) and better firmware (responsiveness). |
| alm:
--- Quote from: tautech on June 28, 2017, 05:44:11 am ---As it's not mains ground referenced some use it like an isolated channel scope; that is with the signal reference at elevated voltages. Would you trust a wallwart for this use case or prefer complete removal from any external power source ? --- End quote --- I do not understand your point. Either you trust the isolation of the channels, which means the scope should be safe to touch, and the power supply does not have to provide any isolation beyond mains, or you do not trust the isolation and you should not touch the scope at all during elevated measurements. In the latter case, you probably should not use it for floating measurements at all, even on battery power. The only advantage I see for battery power on the bench is to limit capacitance to ground, but that is not a safety issue but a signal integrity issue (common mode noise). The old hanging the scope by three silk threads ;). |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |