| Products > Test Equipment |
| Nano VNA like sand on the sea- Who is the "good one" ? |
| << < (4/7) > >> |
| ch_scr:
--- Quote from: Aldo22 on July 10, 2024, 10:53:27 am ---Sure, that too, but doesn't the 50€ version go to 1.5GHz? --- End quote --- "The 50K-300MHz-Range has a dynamic range of more than 70 dB. The extended 300M-900MHz-range has more than 60 dB and 900M-1,5-GHz more than 40 dB" As usual "it depends" but above 900MHz you'll really want the "better" one. |
| Martin72:
Hello, Thank you for the numerous replies. :-+ What I was able to filter out for myself is that there is such a thing as "authorized" distributors. And it also sounds good that you can use the smaller, cheaper ones for LCR measurements, because that's what I'm interested in. However, I find the "larger" screen to be quite small, so the 2.8" models are a no-go. On the Nano VNA page, AURSINC is mentioned as an amazon dealer, which would be this device, for example: Nano VNA-F V2 That would be OK then? |
| ch_scr:
--- Quote from: Martin72 on July 10, 2024, 11:45:48 am ---Hello, Thank you for the numerous replies. :-+ What I was able to filter out for myself is that there is such a thing as "authorized" distributors. And it also sounds good that you can use the smaller, cheaper ones for LCR measurements, because that's what I'm interested in. However, I find the "larger" screen to be quite small, so the 2.8" models are a no-go. On the Nano VNA page, AURSINC is mentioned as an amazon dealer, which would be this device, for example: Nano VNA-F V2 That would be OK then? --- End quote --- I don't get the appeal? For like 5-10€ more you get the 6GHz LiteVNA already, and from a proper distributor. It comes with cables and cal standards as well. |
| Aldo22:
--- Quote from: Martin72 on July 10, 2024, 11:45:48 am ---However, I find the "larger" screen to be quite small, so the 2.8" models are a no-go. --- End quote --- That's a matter of taste. The 2.8" model fits easily in your pocket and if you need it more convenient, there is the PC software. |
| pdenisowski:
--- Quote from: tszaboo on July 09, 2024, 10:31:16 pm ---For the Nano, the H4 is recommended by a lot of people. --- End quote --- I have a "vintage" NanoVNA and an H4. The H4 is much nicer, and I can do a FW swap to turn it into a phase and frequency analyzer. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |