Products > Test Equipment
Nano VNA like sand on the sea- Who is the "good one" ?
<< < (4/7) > >>
ch_scr:

--- Quote from: Aldo22 on July 10, 2024, 10:53:27 am ---Sure, that too, but doesn't the 50€ version go to 1.5GHz?

--- End quote ---
"The 50K-300MHz-Range has a dynamic range of more than 70 dB. The extended 300M-900MHz-range has more than 60 dB and 900M-1,5-GHz more than 40 dB"
As usual "it depends" but above 900MHz you'll really want the "better" one.
Martin72:
Hello,
Thank you for the numerous replies. :-+
What I was able to filter out for myself is that there is such a thing as "authorized" distributors.
And it also sounds good that you can use the smaller, cheaper ones for LCR measurements, because that's what I'm interested in.
However, I find the "larger" screen to be quite small, so the 2.8" models are a no-go.

On the Nano VNA page, AURSINC is mentioned as an amazon dealer, which would be this device, for example:

Nano VNA-F V2
That would be OK then?

ch_scr:

--- Quote from: Martin72 on July 10, 2024, 11:45:48 am ---Hello,
Thank you for the numerous replies. :-+
What I was able to filter out for myself is that there is such a thing as "authorized" distributors.
And it also sounds good that you can use the smaller, cheaper ones for LCR measurements, because that's what I'm interested in.
However, I find the "larger" screen to be quite small, so the 2.8" models are a no-go.

On the Nano VNA page, AURSINC is mentioned as an amazon dealer, which would be this device, for example:

Nano VNA-F V2
That would be OK then?

--- End quote ---
I don't get the appeal? For like 5-10€ more you get the 6GHz LiteVNA already, and from a proper distributor. It comes with cables and cal standards as well.
Aldo22:

--- Quote from: Martin72 on July 10, 2024, 11:45:48 am ---However, I find the "larger" screen to be quite small, so the 2.8" models are a no-go.

--- End quote ---

That's a matter of taste.
The 2.8" model fits easily in your pocket and if you need it more convenient, there is the PC software.

pdenisowski:

--- Quote from: tszaboo on July 09, 2024, 10:31:16 pm ---For the Nano, the H4 is recommended by a lot of people.
--- End quote ---

I have a "vintage" NanoVNA and an H4.  The H4 is much nicer, and I can do a FW swap to turn it into a phase and frequency analyzer.
Navigation
Message Index
Next page
Previous page
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...

Go to full version
Powered by SMFPacks Advanced Attachments Uploader Mod